Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 12-20

  Nam, Taewoo ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Citizen sourcing; Crowd sourcing; Government 2.0; Open government; Wisdom of crowds

Indexed keywords

EID: 83055176288     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Benkler Y. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom 2006, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
2. Bertot J.C., Jaeger P.T., Grimes J.M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(3):264-271.
3. Bertot J.C., Jaeger P.T., Grimes J.M. Crowd-sourcing transparency: ICTs, social media, and government transparency initiatives. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research 2010, 51-58. Pueblo, Mexico, May 17-20.
4. Bertot J.C., Jaeger P.T., Munson S., Glaisyer T. Social media technology and government transparency. Computer 2010, 43(11):53-59.
5. Bittle S., Haller C., Kadlec A. Promising Practices in Online Engagement. New York: Center for Advances in Public Engagement, Public Agenda 2009, Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://publicagenda.org/files/pdf/PA%5FCAPE%5FPaper3%5FPromising%5FMech2.pdf.
6. Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. Altruistic individuals, selfish firms? The structure of motivation in Open Source software. First Monday 2004, 9. Retrieved July 1, 2011, from, 1. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1113.
7. Boutin P. Crowdsourcing: Consumers as creators 2006, July 13, Bloomberg Businessweek, Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/jul2006/id20060713%5F755844.htm.
8. Bovaird T. Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review 2007, 67(5):846-860.
9. Brabham D.C. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 2008, 14(1):75-90.
10. Brabham D.C. Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. First Monday 2008, 13(6). Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2159/1969.
11. Brabham D.C. Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory 2009, 8(3):242-262.
12. Brabham D.C. Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), Boston, August 5-8 2009.
13. Breul J.D. Practitioner's perspective-Improving sourcing decisions. Public Administration Review 2010, 70(S1):S193-S200.
14. Brito J. Hack, mash & peer: Crowdsourcing government transparency. The Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 2008, 9:119-157.
15. Bronk C., Smith T. Diplopedia imagined: Building state's diplomacy wiki. Proceedings of the 2010 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems 2010, Chicago, May 17-21.
16. Burke M., Marlow C., Lento T. Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social networking sites. Paper presented at the CHI 2009, Boston, April 7 2009.
17. Cassia F., Magno F. Public services co-production: Exploring the role of citizen orientation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 2009, 1(3):334-343.
18. Center for Technology in Government Exploratory social media project - Phase I: Identifying benefits and concerns surrounding use of social media in government 2009, Retrieved July 1, 2011, from, The Research Foundation of State University of New York, Albany, NY. http://ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/social%5Fmedia/social%5Fmedia.pdf.
19. Chun S.A., Shulman S., Sandoval R., Hovy E. Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity 2010, 15(1/2):1-9.
20. Cole R. Social media: What does it mean for public managers?. Public Management 2009, 91(9). Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://webapps.icma.org/pm/9109/public/cover.cfm?author=rick%20cole&title=social%20media:%20not%20your%20grandfather's%20democracy.
21. Cordella A., Iannacci F. Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2010, 19(1):52-66.
22. DiMaio A. Government 2.0: A Gartner definition 2009, Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea%5Fdimaio/2009/11/13/government-2-0-a-gartner-definition/.
23. Dutil P.A., Howard C., Langford J., Roy J. Rethinking government-public relationships in a digital world: Customers, clients, or citizens?. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 2007, 4(1):77-90.
24. Dutton W.H. Networking distributed public expertise: Strategies for citizen sourcing advice to government. One of a Series of Occasional Papers in Science and Technology Policy 2011, Retrieved July 1, 2011 from, Science and Technology Policy Institute. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1767870.
25. Earle P., Guy M., Buckmaster R., Ostrum C., Horvath S., Vaughan A. OMG earthquake! Can Twitter improve earthquake response?. Seismological Research Letters 2010, 81(2):246-251.
26. Executive Office of the President Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Open Government Directive 2009, December 8, Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive.
27. Farina C.R. The consent of the governed: Against simple rules for a complex world. Chicago-Kent Law Review 1997, 72:987-1037.
28. Fountain J.E. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change 2001, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
29. Fung A., Graham M., Weil D. Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency 2007, Cambridge University Press, New York.
30. Ghosh R.A. FM interview with Linus Torvalds: What motivates free software developers?. First Monday 1998, 3(3). Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/583/04.
31. Gil-Garcia J.R. Enacting state websites: A mixed method study exploring e-government success in multi-organizational settings. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kauai, Hawaii 2006, January 4-7.
32. Gil-Garcia J.R., Hassan S. Structuration theory and government IT. Handbook of research on public information technology 2008, 361-375. IGI Global, Hershey, PA. D.G. Garson, M. Khosrow-Pour (Eds.).
33. Hars A., Ou S. Working for free?: Motivations for participating in open source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2002, 6(3):25-39.
34. Hertel G., Niedner S., Hermann S. Motivation of software developers in the open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy 2003, 32(7):1159-1177.
35. Hilgers D., Ihl C. Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. The International Journal of Public Participation 2010, 4(1):67-88.
36. Hindman M. "Open-source politics" reconsidered: Emerging patterns in online political participation. Governance and Information Technology: From Electronic Government to Information Government 2007, 183-207. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. V. Mayer-Schönberger, D. Lazer (Eds.).
37. Howe J. The rise of crowd sourcing. Wired 2006, 14(6):176-183.
38. Howe J. Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business 2009, Random House, New York.
39. Hrdinová J., Helbig N., Peters C.S. Designing social media policy for government: Eight essential elements. Center for Technology in Government 2010, The Research Foundation of State University of New York, Albany, NY, Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://ctg.albany.edu/publications/guides/social%5Fmedia%5Fpolicy/social%5Fmedia%5Fpolicy.pdf.
40. Jaeger P.T., Bertot J.C. Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(4):371-376.
41. Johannessen M.R. Different theory, different result: Examining how different theories lead to different insights in government 2.0 research. Proceedings of the 1st Scandinavian Conference of Information Systems and the 33rd Information Systems Research in Scandinavia (IRIS) Seminar, Skørping, Denmark 2010, August 20-24.
42. Lancashire D. Code, culture and cash: The fading altruism of open source development. First Monday 2001, 6(12). Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/904/813.
43. Lévy P. Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace 1997, Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA.
44. Lind E.A., Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice 1988, Plenum, New York.
45. Lukensmeyer C.J., Torres L.H. Citizensourcing: Citizen participation in a networked nation. Civic engagement in a network society 2008, 207-233. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC. K. Yang, E. Bergrud (Eds.).
46. Luna-Reyes L.F., Gil-Garcia J.R. Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena. Government Information Quarterly 2011, 28(3):329-345.
47. Madison J. The federalist No. 10. The federalist papers 1961, 77-84. New American Library, New York. C. Rossiter (Ed.).
48. Margetts H. Smartening up to risk in electronic government. Information Polity 2005, 10(1/2):81-94.
49. McDermott P. Building open government. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(4):401-413.
50. Millard J. Government 1.5: Is the bottle half full or half empty?. European Journal of ePractice 2009, 9(1):35-50. Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://www.epractice.eu/files/European%20Journal%20epractice%20Volume%209%5F1.pdf.
51. Mintz D. Government 2.0: Fact or fiction?. Public Manager 2008, 36(4):21-24.
52. Misuraca G.C. e-Government 2015: Exploring m-government scenarios, between ICT-driven experiments and citizen-centric implications. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2009, 21(3):407-424.
53. Moore T.D., Serva M.A. Understanding member motivation for contributing to different types of virtual communities: A proposed framework. Paper presented at the SICMIS-CPR, St. Louis, MO, April 19-21 2007.
54. Mossberger K., Tolbert C.J., McNeal R.S. Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation 2008, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
55. Mossberger K., Tolbert C.J., Stansbury M. Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide 2003, George Washington University Press, Washington, DC.
56. Norris P. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide 2001, Cambridge University Press, New York.
57. Nov O. What motivates Wikipedians?. Communications of the ACM 2007, 50(11):60-64.
58. Noveck B.S. Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful 2009, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
59. Nye J.S. Introduction: The decline of confidence in government. Why people don't trust government 1997, 1-18. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. J.S. Nye, P.D. Selikow, D.C. King (Eds.).
60. O'Reilly T. Government as a platform. Innovations 2010, 6(1):13-40.
61. Obama B. Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Transparency and open government 2009, January 21, Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the%5Fpress%5Foffice/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/.
62. Orlikowski W. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 2000, 11(4):404-428.
63. Orlikowski W.J., Iacono C.S. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research-A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 2001, 12(2):121-134.
64. Orlikowski W.J., Scott S.V. Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals 2008, 2:433-474.
65. Parent M., Vandebeek C.A., Gemino A.C. Building citizen trust through e-government. Government Information Quarterly 2005, 22(4):720-736.
66. Pateman C. Participation and Democratic Theory 1970, Cambridge University Press, London.
67. Peddibhotla N.B., Subramani M.R. Contributing to public document repositories: A critical mass theory perspective. Organization Studies 2007, 28(3):327-346.
68. Peristeras V., Mentzas G., Tarabanis K.A., Abecker A. Transforming e-government and e-participation through IT. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2009, 24(5):14-19.
69. Peters M.A., Araya D. Networks, information politics and the new paradigm of social production. Educational research: Networks and technologies 2008, 33-42. Springer, New York. P. Smeyers, M. Depaepe (Eds.).
70. Rafaeli S., Ariel Y. Online motivational factors: Incentives for participation and contribution in Wikipedia. Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications 2008, 243-267. Cambridge University Press, New York. A. Barak (Ed.).
71. Ramos M., Piper P.S. Letting the grass grow: Grassroots information on blogs and wikis. Reference Services Review 2006, 34(4):570-574.
72. Rheingold H. Smart mobs: The next social revolution 2002, Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA.
73. Sæbø Ø., Rose J., Flak L.S. The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly 2008, 25(3):400-428.
74. Sæbø Ø., Rose J., Nyvang T. The role of social networking services in eParticipation. ePart 2009: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Electronic Participation 2009, 46-55. Linz, Austria, September 1-3. A. Macintosh, E. Tambouris (Eds.).
75. Sanders L.M. Against deliberation. Political Theory 1997, 25(3):347-376.
76. Sartori G. Compare why and how: Comparing, miscomparing and the comparative methods. Comparing nations: Concepts, strategies and substance 1994, 14-34. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. M. Dogan, A. Kazancigil (Eds.).
77. Schellong A. EU eGovernment benchmarking 2010+: General remarks on the future of benchmarking digital government in the EU 2009, Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://www.iq.harvard.edu/blog/netgov/papers/schellong%5F2009%5Fwp%5Feu%5Fegovernment%5Fbenchmarking%5Ffuture%5Fmethodology.pdf.
78. Shkabatur J. Cities crossroads: Digital technology and local democracy in America. Brooklyn Law Review 2011, 76(4). Retrieved July 1, 2011, from. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1781484.
79. Smith R.M. Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The multiple traditions of America. American Political Science Review 1993, 87(3):549-566.
80. Steele-Vivas R.D. Creating a smart nation: Strategy, policy, intelligence, and information. Government Information Quarterly 1996, 13(2):159-173.
81. Sunstein C.R. Deliberative trouble? Why groups go to extremes. Yale Law Journal 2000, 110:71-119.
82. Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations 2004, Doubleday, New York.
83. Tapscott D. The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence 1995, Mc-Graw Hill, New York.
84. Tapscott D., Williams A.D. Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything 2008, Penguin Group, New York.
85. Toffler A. The third wave: The classic study of tomorrow 1980, Bantam, New York.
86. Torres L.H. Citizen sourcing in the public interest. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 2007, 3(1):134-145.
87. Tyler T.R. Why people obey the law 2006, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
88. Verba S., Schlozman K.L., Brady H.E. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics 1995, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
89. Wilson S.C., Linders D. The Open Government Directive: A preliminary assessment. Proceedings of the iConference 2011, 387-394. Seattle, February 8-11.
90. Wimmer M.A. Ontology for an e-participation virtual resource centre. Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance 2007, Macao, China, December 10-13.