Chromothripsis: Potential origin in gametogenesis and preimplantation cell divisions. A review

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1785-1796

  Pellestor, Franck ^a,b   Gatinois, Vincent ^a,b   Puechberty, Jacques ^a   Geneviève, David ^a   Lefort, Geneviève ^a  

^a HÔPITAL ARNAUD DE VILLENEUVE   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE GÉNOMIQUE FONCTIONNELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Chromothripsis; Embryo; Fertilization; Gametogenesis; Massive chromosomal rearrangement

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN P53;

APOPTOSIS; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL KINETICS; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOTHRIPSIS; CONGENITAL DISORDER; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ENZYME INACTIVATION; FERTILIZATION; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GAMETE; GAMETOGENESIS; GENE SEQUENCE; GERM CELL; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MITOSIS; NEOPLASM; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SPERMATOGENESIS; TELOMERE; ZYGOTE; BLASTOCYST; CHEMICALLY INDUCED; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME DISORDER; DISORDERS OF DNA SYNTHESIS AND REPAIR; DRUG EFFECTS; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETICS; HUMAN GENOME;

BLASTOCYST; CELL DIVISION; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOME BREAKPOINTS; CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; DNA REPAIR-DEFICIENCY DISORDERS; GAMETOGENESIS; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOME, HUMAN; GERM CELLS; HUMANS;

EID: 84922011954     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Pellestor F, Anahory T, Lefort G, Puechberty J, Liehr T, Hédon B, et al. Complex chromosomal rearrangements: origin and meiotic behavior. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:476-94.
2. Madan K. Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements: reproductive aspects. A review. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158:947-63.
3. Loup V, Bernicot I, Janssens P, Hédon B, Hamamah S, Pellestor F, et al. Combined FISH and PRINS sperm analysis of complex chromosomes rearrangement t(1;19;13): an approach facilitating PGD. Mol Hum Reprod 2010;16:111-6.
4. Godo A, Blanco J, Vidal F, Parriego M, Boada M, Anton E. Sequential FISH allows the determination of the segregation outcome and the presence of numerical anomalies in spermatozoa from a t(1;8;2)(q42;p21;p15) carrier. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:1115-23.
5. Lim CK, Cho JW, Kim JY, Kang IS, Shim SH, Jun JH. A healthy live birth after successful preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carriers of complex chromosomes rearrangements. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1680-4.
6. Escudero T, Estop A, Fisher J, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for complex chromosome rearrangements. Am J Med Genet A 2008;146:1662-9.
7. Vanneste E, Melotte C, Voet T, Robberecht C, Debrock S, Pexsters A, et al. PGD for a complex chromosomal rearrangement by array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 2011;26:941-9.
8. Scriven PN, Bint SM, Davies AF, Mackie Ogilvie C. Meiotic outcomes of three-way translocations ascertained in cleavage-stage embryos: refinement of reproductive risks and implications for PGD. Eur J Hum Genet 2014;22:748-53.
9. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-74.
10. Yates LR, Campbell PJ. Evolution of the cancer genome. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13:795-806.
11. Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B, Yang F, Bignell GR, Mudie LJ, et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 2011;144:27-40.
12. Kloosterman WP, Gurvey V, van Roosmalen M, Duran KJ, de Bruijn E, Bakker SC, et al. Chromothripsis as a mechanism driving complex de novo structural rearrangements in the germline. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20:1916-24.
13. Magrangeas F, Avet-Loiseau H, Munshi NC, Minvielle S. Chromothripsis identifies a rare and aggressive entity among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2011;118:675-8.
14. Molenaar JJ, Koster J, Zwijnenburg DA, van Sluis P, Valentijn LJ, van der Ploeg I, et al. Sequencing of neuroblastoma identi fies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes. Nature 2012;483:589-93.
15. Nagel S, Meyer C, Quentmeier H, Kaufmann M, Drexier HG, MacLeod RA. Chromothripsis in Hodgkin lymphoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2013;52:741-7.
16. Teles Alves I, Hiltemann S, Hartjes T, van der Spek P, Stubbs A, Trapman J, et al. Gene fusions by chromothripsis of chromosome 5q in the VCaP prostate cancer cell line. Hum Genet 2013;132:709-13.
17. Hirsch D, Kemmerling R, Davis S, Camps J, Meltzer PS, Ried T, et al. Chromothripsis and focal copy number alterations determine poor outcome in malignant melanoma. Cancer Res 2013;73:1454-60.
18. Boeva V, Jouannet S, Daveau R, Combaret V, Pierre-Eugène C, Cazes A, et al. Breakpoint features of genomic rearrangements in neuroblastoma with unbalanced translocations and chromothripsis. PLoS One 2013;26:e72182.
19. Zack TI, Schumacher SE, Carter SL, Cherniack AD, Saksena G, Tabak B, et al. Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy-number alteration. Nat Genet 2013;45:1134-40.
20. Kim TM, Luquette LJ, Park RW, Johnson MD, Park PJ. Functional genomic analysis of chromosomal aberrations in a compendium of 8000 cancer genomes. Genome Res 2013;23:217-27.
21. Wyatt AW, Collins CC. In Brief: chromothripsis and cancer. J Pathol 2013;231:1-3.
22. Malhotra A, Lindgerg M, Faust GG, Leibowitz ML, Clark RA, Layer RM, et al. Breakpoint profiling of 64 cancer genomes reveals numerous complex rearrangements spawned by homology-independent mechanisms. Genome Res 2013;23:762-76.
23. Forment JV, Kaidi A, Jackson SP. Chromothripsis and cancer: causes and consequences of chromosome shattering. Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12:663-70.
24. Kloosterman WP, Koster J, Molenaar JJ. Prevalence and clinical implications of chromothrispsis in cancer genomes. Curr Opin Oncol 2014;26:64-72.
25. Mehine M, Kaasinen E, Mäkinen N, Katainen R, Kämpjärvi K, Pitkänen E, et al. Characterization of uterine leiomyomas by whole-genome sequencing. N Engl J Med 2013;369:43-53.
26. Liu P, Erez A, Sreenath Nagamani SC, Dhar SU, Kolodziejska KE, Dharmadhikari AV, et al. Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements. Cell 2011;146:889-903.
27. Chiang C, Jacobsen JC, Ernst C, Hanscom C, Heilbut A, Blumenthal I, et al. Complex reorganization and predominant non-homologous repair following chromosomal breakage in karyotypically balanced germline rearrangements and transgenic integration. Nat Genet 2012;44:390-7.
28. Kloosterman WP, Tavakoli-Yaraki M, van Roosmalen M, van Binsbergen E, Renkens I, Duran KJ, et al. Constitutional chromothripsis rearrangements involve clustered double-stranded DNA breaks and nonhomologous repair mechanisms. Cell Rep 2012;1:648-55.
29. Rausch T, Jones DT, Zapatka M, Stütz AM, Zichner T, Weischenfeldt J, et al. Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations. Cell 2012;148:59-71.
30. Korbel JO, Campbell PJ. Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes. Cell 2013;152:1226-36.
31. Kloosterman WP, Cuppen E. Chromothripsis in congenital disorders and cancer: similarities and differences. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013;25:341-8.
32. Govind SK, Zia A, Hennings-Yeomans PH, Watson JD, Fraser M, Anghel C, et al. ShatterProof: operational detection and quantification of chromothripsis. BMC Bioinformatics 2014;15:78.
33. Tsai AG, Lieber MR. Mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangement in the human genome. BMC Genomics 2010;11(Suppl):S1.
34. Stevens JB, Abdallah BY, Regan SM, Liu G, Bremer SW, Ye CJ, et al. Comparison of mitotic cell death by chromosome fragmentation to premature chromosome condensation. Mol Cytogenet 2010;3:20-30.
35. Kasparek TR, Humphrey TC. DNA double-strand break repair pathways, chromosomal rearrangements and cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011;22:886-97.
36. Lieber MR. NHEJ and its backup pathways in chromosomal translocations. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010;17:393-5.
37. Huertas P. DNA resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to fix the break. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010;17:11-6.
38. Lee JA, Carvalho CM, Lupski JR. A DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell 2007;131:1235-47.
39. Hastings PJ, Ira G, Lupski JR. A microhomology-mediated break-induced replication model for the origin of human copy number variation. PLoS Genet 2009;5:e1000327.
40. Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. Chromoanagenesis and cancer: mechanisms and consequences of localized, complex chromosomal rearrangements. Nat Med 2012;18:1630-8.
41. Liu P, Carvalho CM, Hastings PJ, Lupski JR. Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2012;22:211-20.
42. Huttley GA, Jakobsen IB, Wilson SR, Easteal S. How important is DNA replication for mutagenesis? Mol Biol Evol 2000;17:929-37.
43. Rubes J, Selevan SG, Sram RJ, Evenson DP, Perreault SD. GSTM1 genotype influences the susceptibility of men to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution. Mutat Res 2007;625:20-8.
44. Gallegos G, Ramos B, Santiso R, Goyanes V, Gosalvez J, Fernandez JL. Sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with genitourinary infection by Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma. Fertil Steril 2008;90:328-34.
45. Gosalvez J, Lopez-Fernandez C, Fernandez JL, Gouraud A, Holt WV. Relationships between the dynamics of iatrogenic DNA damage and genomic design in mammalian spermatozoa from eleven species. Mol Reprod Dev 2011;78:951-61.
46. Jackson RE, Bormann CL, Hassun PA, Rocha AM, Motta EL, Serafini PC, et al. Effects of semen storage and separation techniques on sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2626-30.
47. Sakkas D, Alvarez JG. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil Steril 2010;93:1027-36.
48. Rübe CE, Zhang S, Miebach N, Fricke A, Rübe C. Protecting the heritable genome: DNA damage response mechanisms in spermatogonial stem cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011;10:159-68.
49. Pandita TK, Richardson C. Chromatin remodeling finds its place in the DNA double-strand break response. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:1363-77.
50. Price BD, D'Andrea AD. Chromatin remodeling at DNA double-stand breaks. Cell 2013;152:1344-54.
51. Hurst LD, Ellegren H. Sex biases in the mutation rate. Trends Genet 1998;14:446-52.
52. Bartek J, Lukas C, Lukas J. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004;5:792-804.
53. Green BM, Finn KJ, Li JJ. Loss of DNA replication control is a potent inducer of gene amplification. Science 2010;329:943-6.
54. Jones MJ, Jallepalli PV. Chromothripsis: chromosomes in crisis. Dev Cell 2012;23:908-17.
55. Cimini D, Howell B, Maddox P, Khodjakov A, Derassi F, Salmon ED. Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J Cell Biol 2001;153:517-27.
56. Pihan GA. Centrosome dysfunction contributes to chromosome instability, chromoanagenesis, and genome reprogramming in cancer. Front Oncol 2013;3:277.
57. Gisselsson D, Jonson T, Petersen A, Strombeck B, Dal Cin P, Hoglund M, et al. Telomere dysfunction triggers extensive DNA fragmentation and evolution of complex chromosome abnormalities in human malignant tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:12683-8.
58. Tubio JM, Estivill X. When catastrophe strikes a cell. Nature 2011;470:476-7.
59. Taylor RC, Cullen SP, Martin SJ. Apoptosis: controlled demolition at the cellular level. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008;9:231-41.
60. Ciavarra G, Zacksenhaus E. Multiple pathways counteract cell death induced by RB1 loss: implications for cancer. Cell Cycle 2011;15:1533-9.
61. Tang HL, Tang HM, Mak KH, Hu S, Wang SS, Wong KM, et al. Cell survival, DNA damage, and oncogenic transformation after a transient and reversible apoptotic response. Mol Biol Cell 2012;23:2240-52.
62. Sakkas D, Seli E, Bizzaro D, Tarozzi N, Manicardi GC. Abnormal spermatozoa in the ejaculate: abortive apoptosis and faulty nuclear remodeling during spermatogenesis. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:428-32.
63. Crasta K, Ganem NJ, Dagher R, Lanterman AB, Ivanova EV, Pan Y, et al. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 2012;482:53-8.
64. Terradas M, Martin M, Tusell L, Genesca A. Genetic activities in micronuclei: is the DNA entrapped in micronuclei lost for the cell? Mutat Res 2010;705:60-7.
65. Huang Y, Jiang L, Yi Q, Lv L, Wang Z, Zhao X, et al. Lagging chromosomes entrapped in micronuclei are not ''lost'' by cell. Cell Res 2012;22:932-5.
66. Decordier I, Cundari E, Kirsch-Volders M. Survival of aneuploidy, micronucleated and/or polyploidy cells: crosstalk between ploidy control and apoptosis. Mutat Res 2008;651:30-9.
67. Fenech M, Kirsch-Volders M, Natarajan AT, Surralles J, Crott JW, Parry J, et al. Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cell. Mutagenesis 2011;26:125-32.
68. Delhanty JD, Pellestor F. Aneuploidy. Preface. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011;133:89-90.
69. Baarends WM, van der Laan R, Grootegoed A. DNA repair mechanisms and gametogenesis. Reproduction 2001;121:31-9.
70. Ahmed EA, van der Vaart A, Barten A, Kal HB, Chen J, Lou Z, et al. Differences in DNA double strand breaks repair in male germ cell types: lessons learned from a differential expression of Mdc1 and 53BP1. DNA Repair 2007;6:1243-54.
71. Nussenzweig A, Nussenzweig MC. A backup DNA repair pathway loves to the forefront. Cell 2007;131:223-5.
72. Oliver-Bonnet M, Ko E, Martin RH. Male infertility in reciprocal translocation carriers: the sexbody affair. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005;111:434-46.
73. Martin RH. Cytogenetic determinants of male fertility. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:379-90.
74. Ioannou D, Griffin DK. Male fertility, chromosome abnormalities, and nuclear organization. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011;133:269-79.
75. Laberge RM, Boissonneault G. On the nature and origin of DNA strand breaks in elongating spermatids. Biol Reprod 2005;73:289-96.
76. Aoki VW, Liu L, Carrell DT. Identification and evaluation of a novel sperm protamine abnormality in a population of infertile males. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1298-306.
77. Oliva R. Protamines and male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:417-35.
78. Ahmed EA, de Boer P, Philippens ME, Kal HB, de Rooij DG. Parp1-XRCC1 and the repair of DNA double strand breaks in mouse round spermatids. Mutat Res 2010;683:84-90.
79. Rodrigues P, Limback D, McGinnis LK, Plancha CE, Albertini DF. Oogenesis: prospects and challenges for the future. J Cell Physiol 2008;216:355-65.
80. Carroll J, Marangos P. The DNA damage response in mammalian oocytes. Front Genet 2013;4:1-9.
81. Pellestor F, Anahory T, Hamamah S. The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11:15-32.
82. Hunt PA, Hassold TJ. Human female meiosis: what makes a good egg go bad? Trends Genet 2008;24:86-93.
83. Miao YL, Kikuchi K, Sun QY, Schatten H. Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Hum Reprod Update 2009;1:1-13.
84. Homer H. New insights into the genetic regulation of homologue disjunction in mammalian oocytes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011;133:209-22.
85. Yuen WS, Merriman JA, O'Bryan MK, Jones KT. DNA double strand breaks but not interstrand crosslinks prevent progress through meiosis in fully grown mouse oocytes. PLoS One 2012;7:e43875.
86. Marchetti F, Essers J, Kanaar R, Wyrobek AJ. Disruption of maternal DNA repair increases sperm-derived chromosomal aberrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:17725-9.
87. Ménézo Y, Russo G, Tosti E, El Mouatassim S, Benkhalifa M. Expression profile of genes coding for DNA repair in human oocytes using pangenomic microarrays, with a special focus on ROS linked decays. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;24:513-20.
88. Jaroudi S, Kakourou G, Cawood S, Doshi A, Ranieri DM, Serhal P, et al. Expression profiling of DNA repair genes in human oocytes and blastocysts using microarrays. Hum Reprod 2009;24:2649-55.
89. Grondahl ML, Ydinq Andersen C, Boqstad J, Nielsen FC, Meinertz H, Borup R. Gene expression profiles of single human mature oocytes in relation to age. Hum Reprod 2010;25:957-68.
90. Santonocito M, Guglielmino MR, Vento M, Raqusa M, Barbagallo D, Borzi P, et al. The apoptotic transcriptome of the human MII oocyte: characterization and age-related changes. Apoptosis 2013;18:201-11.
91. LeMaire-Adkins R, Radke K, Hunt PA. Lack of checkpoint control at the metaphase/anaphase transition: a mechanism of meiotic nondisjunction in mammalian females. J Cell Biol 1997;139:1611-9.
92. Steuerwald N. Meiotic spindle checkpoints for assessment of aneuploid oocytes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005;111:256-9.
93. Marangos P, Carroll J. Oocytes progress beyond prophase in the presence of DNA damage. Curr Biol 2012;22:989-94.
94. Kastan MB, Lim DS. The many substrates and functions of ATM. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2000;1:179-86.
95. Robles P, Roig I, Garcia R, Brieño-Enríquez M, Martin M, Cabero L, et al. Presence of an extra chromosome alters meiotic double-stranded break repair dynamics and MLH1 foci distribution in human oocytes. Chromosoma 2013;122:93-102.
96. Howe K, Fitzharris G. Recent insights into spindle function in mammalian oocytes and early embryos. Biol Reprod 2013;105:1-9.
97. McLay DW, Clarke HJ. Remodeling the paternal chromatin at fertilization in mammals. Reproduction 2003;125:625-33.
98. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Developmental capacity of damaged spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2279-85.
99. Harrison RH, Kuo HC, Scriven PN, Handyside AH, Ogilvie CM. Lack of cell cycle checkpoints in human cleavage stage embryos revealed by a clonal pattern of chromosomal mosaicism analysed by sequential multicolour FISH. Zygote 2000;8:217-24.
100. Johnson RT, Rao PN. Mammalian cell fusion: induction of premature chromosome condensation in interphase nuclei. Nature 1970;226:717-22.
101. Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Schmiady H, Kentenich H, Soewarto D. Recurrent failure in polar body formation and premature chromosome condensation in oocytes from a human patient: indicators of asynchrony in nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2343-9.
102. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Naghshizadian N, Imani H, Razavi S, Mardani M, Kazemi S, et al. Can sperm protamine deficiency induce sperm premature chromosomal condensation? Andrologia 2006;38:92-8.
103. Meyerson M, Pellman D. Cancer genomes evolve by pulverizing single chromosome. Cell 2011;144:9-10.
104. Mertzanidou A, Wilton L, Cheng J, Spits C, Vanneste E, Moreau Y, et al. Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. Hum Reprod 2013;28:256-64.
105. Van Echten-Arends J, Mastenbroek S, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Heineman MJ, van der Veen F, et al. Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:620-7.
106. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caigec C, Debrock S, Sermon K, Staessen C, et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med 2009;15:577-83.
107. Voet T, Vanneste E, Vermeesch JR. The human cleavage sage embryo is a cradle of chromosomal rearrangements. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011;133:160-8.
108. Delimitreva SM, Zhivkova RS, Vatev IT, Toncheva D. Chromosomal disorders and nuclear and cell destruction in cleaving human embryos. Int J Dev Biol 2005;49:409-16.
109. Wong CC, Loewke KE, Bossert NL, Behr B, De Jonge CJ, Baer TM, et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol 2010;10:1115-21.
110. Chavez SL, Loewke KE, Han J, Moussavi F, Colls P, Munne S, et al. Dynamic blastomere behaviours reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage. Nat Commun 2012;3:1251.
111. Ambartsumyan G, Clark AT. Aneuploidy and early human embryo development. Hum Mol Genet 2008;17:R10-5.
112. Lebedev I. Mosaic aneuploidy in early fetal losses. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011;133:169-83.
113. Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ. Surfing the p53 network. Nature 2000;408:307-10.
114. Fridman JS, Lowe SW. Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 2003;22:9030-40.
115. Odorisio T, Rodriguez TA, Evans EP, Clarke AR, Burgoyne PS. The meiotic checkpoint monitoring synapsis eliminates spermatocytes via p53-independent apoptosis. Nat Genet 1998;18:257-61.
116. Wells D, Bermudez MG, Steuerwald N, Thornhill AR, Walker DL, Malter H, et al. Expression of genes regulating chromosome segregation, the cell cycle and apoptosis during human preimplantation development. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1339-48.
117. Corbo RM, Gambina G, Scacchi R. How contemporary human reproductive behaviors influence the role of fertility-related genes: the example of the P53 gene. PLoS One 2012;7:e35431.
118. Suh AK, Yang A, Kettenbach A, Bamberger C, Michaelis AH, Zhu Z, et al. p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest. Nature 2006;444:624-8.
119. Levine A, Tomasini R, McKeon FD, Mak TW, Melino G. The p53 family: guardians of maternal reproduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011;12:259-65.
120. Hu W, Zheng T, Wang J. Regulation of fertility by the p53 family members. Genes Cancer 2011;2:420-30.
121. Paulasova P, Diblik J, Trkova M, Macek M Sr, Sedlacek Z. Increased sperm aneuploidy in two male carriers of germline TP53 mutations. Cancer Genet 2011;204:278-81.
122. Pellestor F. Chromothripsis: how does such a catastrophic event impact human reproduction? Hum Reprod 2014;29:388-93.
123. Righolt C, Mai S. Shattered and stitched chromosomes - chromthripsis and chromoana synthesis - manifestations of a new chromosome crisis? Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2012;51:975-81.
124. Kinsella M, Patel A, Bafna V. The elusive evidence for chromothripsis. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:8231-42.
125. Liu G, Stevens JB, Horne SD, Abdallah BY, Ye KJ, Bremer SW, et al. Genome chaos: survival strategy during crisis. Cell Cycle 2014;13:1-10.