Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos

Human Reproduction

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 256-264

  Mertzanidou, A ^a   Wilton, L ^b   Cheng, J ^c,d   Spits, C ^a   Vanneste, E ^e   Moreau, Y ^c,d   Vermeesch, J R ^e   Sermon, K ^a  

^a FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY   (Belgium)

^b MELBOURNE IVF   (Australia)

^c Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

aneuploidy; array CGH; chromosomal abnormalities; mosaicism; preimplantation embryo

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; BLASTOMA; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DIPLOIDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GAMETE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOSAICISM; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; QUALITY CONTROL; ROOM TEMPERATURE; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

EID: 84871195080     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des362     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D. First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1560-1574.
2. Baart EB, Martini E, van den Berg I, Macklon NS, Galjaard RJH, Fauser BCJM, Van Opstal D. Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod 2006;21:223-233.
3. Barbash-Hazan S, Frumkin T, Malcov M, Yaron Y, Cohen T, Azem F, Amit A, Ben-Yosef D. Preimplantation aneuploid embryos undergo self-correction in correlation with their developmental potential. Fertil Steril 2009;92:890-896.
4. Bielanska M, Tan SL, Ao A. Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome. Hum Reprod 2002;17:413-419.
5. Cheng J, Vanneste E, Konings P, Voet T, Vermeesch JR, Moreau Y. Single-cell copy number variation detection. Genome Biol 2011;12:R80.
6. Daphnis DD, Fragouli E, Economou K, Jerkovic S, Craft IL, Delhanty JD, Harper JC. Analysis of the evolution of chromosome abnormalities in human embryos from Day 3 to 5 using CGH and FISH. Mol Hum Reprod 2008;14:117-125.
7. Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iammarrone E, Gordon A, Pantos K. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1925-1935.
8. Fragouli E, Wells D, Doshi A, Gotts S, Harper JC, Delhanty JD. Complete cytogenetic investigation of oocytes from a young cancer patient with the use of comparative genomic hybridisation reveals meiotic errors. Prenat Diagn 2006;26:71-76.
9. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Daphnis DD, Goodall N-N, Mania A, Griffiths T, Gordon A, Wells D. Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. Hum Reprod 2011;26:480-490.
10. Gonzalez-Merino E, Emiliani S, Vassart G, Van den Bergh M, Vannin AS, Abramowicz M, Delneste D, Englert Y. Incidence of chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos at different developmental stages analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genet Test 2003;7:85-95.
11. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garca J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munne S. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 2011;95:953-958.
12. Jericho H. A modified cryopreservation method increases the survival of human biopsied cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:568-571.
13. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M, Ross R, Alper M, Barrett B, Frederick J et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1066-1075.
14. Kalousek DK. Pathogenesis of chromosomal mosaicism and its effect on early human development. Am J Med Genet 2000;91:39-45.
15. Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K, De Rycke M, Thienpont B, Debrock S, Staessen C, Moreau Y, Fryns JP, Van Steirteghem A et al. Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:e68.
16. Los FJ, Van Opstal D, van den Berg C. The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:79-94.
17. Munne S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 1995;64:382-391.
18. Olshen AB, Venkatraman ES, Lucito R, Wigler M. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 2004;5:557-572.
19. Robberecht C, Vanneste E, Pexsters A, D'Hooghe T, Voet T, Vermeesch JR. Somatic genomic variations in early human prenatal development. Curr Genomics 2010;11:397-401.
20. Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Mercader A, Mateu E, Buend P, Pehlivan T, Santos DL, Sim C, Viloria T, Jos M. Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on preimplantation embryo development. Prenat Diagn 2007;27:748-756.
21. Spits C, Le Caignec C, De Rycke M, Van Haute L, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I, Sermon K. Whole-genome multiple displacement amplification from single cells. Nat Protoc 2006;1:1965-1970.
22. Treff NR, Levy B, Su J, Northrop LE, Tao X, Scott RT. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH. Mol Hum Reprod 2010;16:583-589.
23. van de Wiel MA, Kim KI, Vosse SJ, van Wieringen WN, Wilting SM, Ylstra B. CGHcall: calling aberrations for array CGH tumor profiles. Bioinformatics 2007;23:892-894.
24. van Echten-Arends J, Mastenbroek S, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Heineman MJ, van der Veen F, Repping S. Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:620-627.
25. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, Debrock S, Amyere M, Vikkula M, Schuit F et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med 2009;15:577-583.
26. Vanneste E, Melotte C, Voet T, Robberecht C, Debrock S, Pexsters A, Staessen C, Tomassetti C, Legius E, D'Hooghe T et al. PGD for a complex chromosomal rearrangement by array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 2011;26:941-949.
27. Voet T, Vanneste E, Van der Aa N, Melotte C, Jackmaert S, Vandendael T, Declercq M, Debrock S, Fryns JP, Moreau Y et al. Breakage-fusionbridge cycles leading to inv dup del occur in human cleavage stage embryos. Hum Mutat 2011a;32:783-793.
28. Voet T, Vanneste E, Vermeesch JR. The human cleavage stage embryo is a cradle of chromosomal rearrangements. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011b; 133:160-168.
29. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R, Wilton L. Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Genet 2000;106:210-217.
30. Voullaire L, Wilton L, McBain J, Callaghan T, Williamson R. Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure. Mol Hum Reprod 2002;8:1035-1041.
31. Voullaire L, Collins V, Callaghan T, McBain J, Williamson R, Wilton L. High incidence of complex chromosome abnormality in cleavage embryos from patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2007; 87:1053-1058.
32. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, Delhanty JD. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:1214-1218.
33. Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6:1055-1062.