Meiotic spindle checkpoints for assessment of aneuploid oocytes

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Volumn 111, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 256-259

  Steuerwald, N ^a,b  

^a ART Institute of New York and New Jersey   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME PROTEIN;

ANEUPLOIDY; CELL CYCLE; CENTROMERE; FEMALE; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MATERNAL AGE; METAPHASE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW;

ANEUPLOIDY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEIOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MODELS, GENETIC; OOCYTES; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 26244464073     PISSN: 14248581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000086897     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Basto R, Gomes R, Karess RE: Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol 2:939-943 (2000).
2. Bauld R, Sutherland GR, Bain AD: Chromosome studies in investigation of stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Arch Dis Child 49:782-788 (1974).
3. Brady DM, Hardwick KG: Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function. Curr Biol 10:675-678 (2000).
4. Brunet S, Pahlavan G, Taylor S, Maro B: Functionality of the spindle checkpoint during the first meiotic division of mammalian oocytes. Reproduction 126:443-450 (2003).
5. Chan GK, Jablonski SA, Sudakin V, Hittle JC, Yen TJ: Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosomes/APC. J Cell Biol 146:941-954 (1999).
6. Chen RH, Murray A: Characterization of spindle assembly checkpoint in Xenopus egg extracts. Methods Enzymol 283:572-584 (1997).
7. Cleveland DW, Mao Y, Sullivan KF: Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112:407-421 (2003).
8. Dailey T, Dale B, Cohen J, Munne S: Association between nondisjunction and maternal age in meiosis-II human oocytes. Am J Hum Genet 59:176-184 (1996).
9. Dobles M, Liberal V, Scott ML, Benezra R, Sorger PK: Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell 101:635-645 (2000).
10. Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Betzendahl I: Chloral hydrate induced spindle aberrations, metaphase I arrest and aneuploidy in mouse oocytes. Mutagenesis 10:477-486 (1995).
11. Fulka J Jr, Moor RM, Fulka J: Sister chromatid separation and the metaphase-anaphase transition in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 165:410-417 (1994).
12. Fulka J Jr, Moor RM, Fulka J: Mouse oocyte maturation: meiotic checkpoints. Exp Cell Res 219:414-419 (1995a).
13. Fulka J Jr, Moor RM, Fulka J: Replicating DNA does not block germinal vesicle breakdown in mouse oocytes. J Exp Zool 272:245-248 (1995b).
14. Fulka J Jr, Kalab P, First NL, Moor RM: Damaged chromatin does not prevent the exit from metaphase I in fused mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod 12:2473-2476 (1997).
15. Ghabrial A, Schupbach T: Activation of meiotic checkpoint regulates translation of gurken during Drosophila oogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 1:354-357 (1999).
16. Gorbsky GJ: Cell cycle checkpoint: arresting progress in mitosis. Bioessays 19:193-197 (1997).
17. Hagting A, den Elzen N, Vodermaier HC, Waizenegger IC, Peters J-M, Pines J: Human securing proteolysis is controlled by the spindle checkpoint and reveals when the APC/C switches from activation by Cdc20 to Cdh1. J Cell Biol 157:1125-1137 (2002).
18. Hardwick KG: The spindle checkpoint. Trends Genet 14:1-4 (1998).
19. Hartwell L: Defects in a cell cycle checkpoint may be responsible for the genomic instability of cancer cells. Cell 71:543-546 (1992).
20. Hartwell LH, Weinert TA: Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 246:629-634 (1989).
21. Hassold T, Sherman S: Down syndrome: genetic recombination and the origin of the extra chromosome 21. Clin Genet 57:95-100 (2000).
22. Jablonski SA, Chan GKT, Cooke CA, Earnshaw WC, Yen TJ: The hBUB1 and hBUBR1 kinases sequentially assemble onto kinetochores during prophase with hBUBR1 concentrating at the kinetochore plates in mitosis. Chromosoma 107:386-396 (1998).
23. LeMaire-Adkins R, Radke K, Hunt PA: Lack of checkpoint control at the metaphase/anaphase transition: a mechanism of meiotic nondisjunction in mammalian females. J Cell Biol 139:1611-1619 (1997).
24. Li R, Murray AW: Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66:519-531 (1991).
25. Li Y, Benezra R: Identification of human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science 274:246-248 (1996).
26. Li Y, Gorbea C, Mahaffey D, Rechsteiner M, Benezra R: MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12431-12436 (1997).
27. Liu L, Keefe DL: Ageing-associated aberration I meiosis of oocytes from senescence-accelerated mice. Hum Reprod 17:2678-2685 (2002).
28. Liu L, Keefe DL: Nuclear origin of aging-associated meiotic defects in senescence-accelerated mice. Biol Reprod 71:1724-1729 (2004).
29. Luo X, Fang G, Coldiron M, Lin Y, Yu H, Kirschner MW, Wagner G: Structure of the Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint protein and its interaction with Cdc20. Nat Struct Biol 7:224-229 (2000).
30. Michel L, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Narayan G, Hernando E, Vundavalli V, Murty VS: Complete loss of the tumor suppressor MAD2 causes premature cyclin B degradation and mitotic failure in human somatic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:4459-4464 (2004).
31. Nicklas RB, Campbell MS, Ward SC, Gorbsky GJ: Tension-sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation in vitro. J Cell Sci 111:3189-3196 (1998).
32. Ouyang B, Lan Z, Meadows J, Pan H, Fukasawa K, Li W, Dai W: Human Bub1: a putative spindle checkpoint kinase closely linked to cell proliferation. Cell Growth Differ 9:877-885 (1998).
33. Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G: The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol 130:941-948 (1995).
34. Rieder CL, Khodjakov A, Paliulis LV, Fortier TM, Cole RW, Sluder G: Mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells with two spindles: Implications for the metaphase/anaphase transition checkpoint and cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5107-5112 (1997).
35. Shonn MA, McCarroll R, Murray AW: Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 289:300-303 (2000).
36. Shonn MA, Murray AL, Murray AW: Spindle checkpoint component Mad2 contributes to biorientation of homologous chromosomes. Curr Biol 13:1979-1984 (2003).
37. Skoufias DA, Andreassen PR, Lacroix FB, Wilson L, Margolis RL: Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochores-tension checkpoints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4492-4497 (2001).
38. Sluder G, McCollum D: The mad ways of meiosis. Science 289:254-256 (2000).
39. Steuerwald N, Cohen J, Herrera RJ, Brenner CA: Analysis of gene expression in single oocytes and embryos by real-time rapid cycle fluorescence monitored RT-PCR. Mol Hum Reprod 5:1034-1039 (1999).
40. Steuerwald N, Cohen J, Herrera R, Brenner CA: Quantification of mRNA in single oocytes and embryos by real-time rapid cycle fluorescence monitored RT-PCR. Mol Hum Reprod 6:448-453 (2000).
41. Steuerwald N, Cohen J, Herrera R, Sandalinas M, Brenner CA: Association between spindle assembly checkpoint expression and maternal age in human oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 7:49-55 (2001).
42. Straight AF: Cell cycle: checkpoint proteins and kinetochores. Curr Biol 7:R613-R616 (1997).
43. Taylor SS, McKeon F: Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 89:727-735 (1997).
44. Taylor SS, Hussein D, Wang Y, Elderkin S, Morrow CJ: Kinetochore localization and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J Cell Sci 114:4385-4395 (2001).
45. Wassmann K, Niault T, Maro B: Metaphase I arrest upon activation of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Curr Biol 13:1596-1608 (2003).
46. Waters JC, Chen R-H, Murray AW, Salmon ED: Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J Cell Biol 141:1181-1191 (1998).
47. Weiss E, Winey M: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J Cell Biol 132:111-123 (1996).
48. Woods LM, Hodges CA, Baart E, Baker SM, Liskay M, Hunt PA: Chromosomal influence on meiotic spindle assembly: abnormal meiosis I in female Mlh1 mutant mice. J Cell Biol 145:1395-1406 (1999).
49. Yin H, Cukurcam S, Betzendahl I, Adler ID, Eichenlaub-Ritter U: Trichlorfon exposure, spindle aberrations and nondisjunction in mammalian oocytes. Chromosoma 107:514-522 (1998).
50. Zhang D, Ma W, Li Y-H, Hou Y, Li SW, Meng XQ, et al: Intra-oocyte localization of MAD2 and its relationship with kinetochores, microtubules, and chromosomes in rat oocytes during meiosis. Biol Reprod 71:740-748 (2004).