Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 279-292

  Kambe, Gretchen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RETINA FOVEA; TIME;

EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; READING; TIME FACTORS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 2442679483     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194879     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. ALTARRIBA, J., KAMBE, G., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 875-890.
2. ANDREWS, S. (1986). Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 726-740.
3. AYTO, J. (1990). Dictionary of word origins. New York: Arcade.
4. BALOTA, D. A., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
5. BERTRAM, R., HYÖNÄ, J., & LAINE, M. (2000). The role of context in morphological processing: Evidence from Finnish. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 329-366.
6. BINDER, K. S., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (1999). Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1142-1158.
7. BLANCHARD, H. E., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (1989). The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 85-94.
8. BOUMA, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767-782.
9. BRIIHL, D., & INHOFF, A. W. (1995). Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and exterior letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 55-67.
10. BUTTERWORTH, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (Vol. 2, pp. 257-294). San Diego: Academic Press.
11. CARAMAZZA, A., LAUDANNA, A., & ROMANI, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
12. COOLEN, R., VAN JAARSVELD, H. J., & SCHREUDER, R. (1993). Processing novel compounds: Evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns. Memory & Cognition, 21, 235-246.
13. DEUSTCH, A., FROST, R., & FORSTER, K. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1238-1255.
14. DEUTSCH, A., FROST, R., PELEG, S., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415-422.
15. DEUTSCH, A., FROST, R., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (2000). Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 487-506.
16. DREWS, E., & ZWISTERLOOD, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1098-1116.
17. FELDMAN, L. B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Difference between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 442-470.
18. FELDMAN, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1431-1444.
19. FRANCIS, N., & KUČERA, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. FROST, R., DEUTSCH, A., GILBOA, O., TANNENBAUM, M., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. (2000). Morphological priming: Disassociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1277-1288.
21. FROST, R., FORSTER, K. I., & DEUTSCH, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 829-856.
22. GIRAUDO, H., & GRAINGER, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444.
23. GRAINGER, J., COLE, P., & SEGUI, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 370-384.
24. HENDERSON, J. M., & FERREIRA, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 417-429.
25. HYÖNÄ, J., & POLLATSEK, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
26. INHOFF, A. W. (1989a). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 444-461.
27. INHOFF, A. W. (1989b). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 544-555.
28. INHOFF, A. W. (1990). Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role of letter and word units. Acta Psychologica, 73, 281-297.
29. INHOFF, A. W., BRIIHL, D., & SCHWARTZ, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks. Memory & Cognition, 24, 466-476.
30. INHOFF, A. W., POLLATSEK, A., POSNER, M. I., & RAYNER, K. (1989). Covert attention and eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 63-89.
31. INHOFF, A. W., & RAYNER, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431-439.
32. INHOFF, A. W., STARR, M., Liu, W., & WANG, J. (1998). Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 101-106.
33. INHOFF, A. W., & TOUSMAN, S. (1990). Lexical priming from partial-word previews. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 825-836.
34. LAUDANNA, A., BADECKER, W., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1989). Priming homographic stems. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 531-546.
35. LIMA, S. D. (1987). Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 84-99.
36. LIMA, S. D., & INHOFF, A. W. (1985). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 272-285.
37. LIMA. S. D., & POLLATSEK, A. (1983). Lexical access via an orthographic code? The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) reconsidered. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 310-322.
38. MARSLEN-WILSON, W., TYLER, L. K., WAKSLER, R., & OLDER, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
39. McCONKIE, G. W., & RAYNER, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
40. MCCONKIE, G. W., & ZOLA, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 221-224.
41. MORRIS, R. K., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: The role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 268-281.
42. NEUFELDT, V., & GURALNIK, D. B. (1988). Webster's new world dictionary of American English: 3rd college edition. New York: Webster's New World.
43. NISWANDER, E., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (2000). The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 389-420.
44. PLAUT, D. C., & GONNERMAN, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
45. POLLATSEK, A., HYÖNÄ, J., & BERTRAM, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 820-833.
46. POLLATSEK, A., LESCH, M., MORRIS, R. K., & RAYNER, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 148-162.
47. POLLATSEK, A., RAYNER, K., & BALOTA, D. A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 123-130.
48. PRINZMETAL, W. (1990). Neon colors illuminate reading units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 584-597.
49. RASTLE, K., DAVIS, M. H., MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & TYLER, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time course study. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-538.
50. RAYNER, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
51. RAYNER, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
52. RAYNER, K., BALOTA, D. A., & POLLATSEK, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473-483.
53. RAYNER, K., & BERTERA, J. H. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468-469.
54. RAYNER, K., INHOFF, A. W., MORRISON, R., SLOWIACZEK, M. L., & BERTERA, J. H. (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 167-179.
55. RAYNER, K., McCoNKIE, G. W., & ZOLA, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206-226.
56. RAYNER, K., & MORRIS, R. K. (1992). Eye movement control in reading: Evidence against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 163-172.
57. RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1981). Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 351-373.
58. RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
59. RAYNER, K., WELL, A. D., POLLATSEK, A., & BERTERA, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537-550.
60. SANDRA, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 529-567.
61. SHILLCOCK, R. (1990). Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 24-49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. STOLZ, J. A., & FELDMAN, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. TAFT, M. (1985). The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphographic approach. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol 5, pp. 83-124). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
64. TAFT, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
65. TAFT, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. In D. Sandra & M. Taft (Eds.), Morphological structure, lexical representation and lexical access (pp. 271-294). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
66. TAFT, M., & FORSTER, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 607-620.
67. TAFT, M., & ZHU, X. (1994). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 293-316). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. VAN JAARSVELD, H. J., & RATTINK, G. E. (1988). Frequency effects in the processing of lexicalized and novel nominal compounds. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 447-473.
69. ZWITSERLOOD, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 341-368.