Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of Amborella as sister to water lilies

Systematic Biology

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 919-932

  Xi, Zhenxiang ^a   Liu, Liang ^b   Rest, Joshua S ^c   Davis, Charles C ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amborella trichopoda; Coalescent methods; Concatenation methods; Elevated substitution rates; Long branch attraction; Nymphaeales

Indexed keywords

AMBORELLA; AMBORELLA TRICHOPODA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NYMPHAEACEAE; NYMPHAEALES; SPERMATOPHYTA;

ANGIOSPERM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; NYMPHAEA; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENE; PLASTID; PROCEDURES;

ANGIOSPERMS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENES, PLANT; NYMPHAEA; PHYLOGENY; PLASTIDS;

EID: 84919947905     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syu055     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Albert V.A., Barbazuk W.B., dePamphilis C.W., Der J.P., Leebens-Mack J., Ma H., Palmer J.D., Rounsley S., Sankoff D., Schuster S.C., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Wessler S.R., Wing R.A., Ammiraju J.S.S., Chamala S., Chanderbali A.S., Determann R., Ralph P., Talag J., Tomsho L., Walts B., Wanke S., Chang T.H., Lan T.Y., Arikit S., Axtell M.J., Ayyampalayam S., Burnette J.M., De Paoli E., Estill J.C., Farrell N.P., Harkess A., Jiao Y., Liu K., Mei W.B., Meyers B.C., Shahid S., Wafula E., Zhai J.X., Zhang X.B., Carretero-Paulet L., Lyons E., Tang H.B., Zheng C.F., Altman N.S., Chen F., Chen J.Q., Chiang V., Fogliani B., Guo C.C., Harholt J., Job C., Job D., Kim S., Kong H.Z., Li G.L., Li L., Liu J., Park J., Qi X.S., Rajjou L., Burtet-Sarramegna V., Sederoff R., Sun Y.H., Ulvskov P., Villegente M., Xue J.Y., Yeh T.F., Yu X.X., Acosta J.J., Bruenn R.A., de Kochko A., Herrera-Estrella L.R., Ibarra-Laclette E., Kirst M., Pissis S.P., Poncet V. 2013. The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 342:1241089.
2. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410.
3. Barkman T.J., Chenery G., McNeal J.R., Lyons-Weiler J., Ellisens W.J., Moore G., Wolfe A.D., dePamphilis C.W. 2000. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:13166-13171.
4. Bell C.D., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S. 2010. The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited. Am. J. Bot. 97:1296-1303.
5. Bertioli D., Moretzsohn M., Madsen L., Sandal N., Leal-Bertioli S., Guimaraes P., Hougaard B., Fredslund J., Schauser L., Nielsen A., Sato S., Tabata S., Cannon S., Stougaard J. 2009. An analysis of synteny of Arachis with Lotus and Medicago sheds new light on the structure, stability and evolution of legume genomes. BMC Genomics 10:45.
6. Betancur R., Li C., Munroe T.A., Ballesteros J.A., Orti G. 2013. Addressing gene-tree discordance and non-stationarity to resolve a multi-locus phylogeny of the flatfishes (Teleostei: Pleuronectiformes). Syst. Biol. 62:763-785.
7. Boussau B., Gouy M. 2006. Efficient likelihood computations with nonreversible models of evolution. Syst. Biol. 55:756-768.
8. Bowers J.E., Chapman B.A., Rong J.K., Paterson A.H. 2003. Unravelling angiospermgenome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422:433-438.
9. Bremer B., Bremer K., Chase M.W., Fay M.F., Reveal J.L., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Stevens P.F., Anderberg A.A., Moore M.J., Olmstead R.G., Rudall P.J., Sytsma K.J., Tank D.C., Wurdack K., Xiang J.Q.Y., Zmarzty S. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161:105-121.
10. Brinkmann H., Philippe H. 1999. Archaea sister group of bacteria? Indications fromtree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:817-825.
11. Brinkmann H., Van der Giezen M., Zhou Y., De Raucourt G.P., Philippe H. 2005. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 54:743-757.
12. Burleigh J.G., Mathews S. 2004. Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life. Am. J. Bot. 91:1599-1613.
13. Capella-Gutiérrez S., Silla-Martínez J.M., Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972-1973.
14. Conant G.C., Lewis P.O. 2001. Effects of nucleotide composition bias on the success of the parsimony criterion in phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1024-1033.
15. Cummins C.A., McInerney J.O. 2011. A method for inferring the rate of evolution of homologous characters that can potentially improve phylogenetic inference, resolve deep divergence and correct systematic biases. Syst. Biol. 60:833-844.
16. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2:e68.
17. Doyle J.A. 2012. Molecular and fossil evidence on the origin of angiosperms. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 40:301-326.
18. Doyle J.A., Endress P.K. 2014. Integrating Early Cretaceous fossils into the phylogeny of living angiosperms: ANITA lines and relatives of Chloranthaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 175:555-600.
19. Drew B.T., Ruhfel B.R., Smith S.A., Moore M.J., Briggs B.G., Gitzendanner M.A., Soltis P.S., Soltis D.E. 2014. Another look at the root of the angiosperms reveals a familiar tale. Syst. Biol. 63:368-382.
20. Dunn C.W., Hejnol A., Matus D.Q., Pang K., Browne W.E., Smith S.A., Seaver E., Rouse G.W., Obst M., Edgecombe G.D., Sorensen M.V., Haddock S.H.D., Schmidt-Rhaesa A., Okusu A., Kristensen R.M., Wheeler W.C., Martindale M.Q., Giribet G. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745-749.
21. Duvick J., Fu A., Muppirala U., Sabharwal M., Wilkerson M.D., Lawrence C.J., Lushbough C., Brendel V. 2008. PlantGDB: a resource for comparative plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:D959-D965.
22. Edgar R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
23. Enright A.J., vanDongen S., Ouzounis C.A. 2002. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1575-1584.
24. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
25. Finet C., Timme R.E., Delwiche C.F., Marlétaz F. 2010. Multigene phylogeny of the green lineage reveals the origin and diversification of land plants. Curr. Biol. 20:2217-2222.
26. Foster P.G. 2004. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol. 53:485-495.
27. Friedman W.E. 2006. Embryological evidence for developmental lability during early angiosperm evolution. Nature 441:337-340.
28. Friedman W.E., Ryerson K.C. 2009. Reconstructing the ancestral female gametophyte of angiosperms: insights from Amborella and other ancient lineages of flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 96:129-143.
29. Galtier N., Gouy M. 1998. Inferring pattern and process: maximum-likelihood implementation of a nonhomogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:871-879.
30. Goremykin V., Nikiforova S., Bininda-Emonds O. 2010. Automated removal of noisy data in phylogenomic analyses. J. Mol. Evol. 71:319-331.
31. Goremykin V.V., Nikiforova S.V., Biggs P.J., Zhong B.J., Delange P., Martin W., Woetzel S., Atherton R.A., McLenachan P.A., Lockhart P.J. 2013. The evolutionary root of flowering plants. Syst. Biol. 62:50-61.
32. Goremykin V.V., Viola R., Hellwig F.H. 2009. Removal of noisy characters from chloroplast genome-scale data suggests revision of phylogenetic placements of Amborella and Ceratophyllum. J. Mol. Evol. 68:197-204.
33. Gribaldo S., Philippe H. 2002. Ancient phylogenetic relationships. Theor. Popul. Biol. 61:391-408.
34. Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59:307-321.
35. Hejnol A., Obst M., Stamatakis A., Ott M., Rouse G.W., Edgecombe G.D., Martinez P., Baguñà J., Bailly X., Jondelius U., Wiens M., Müller W.E.G., Seaver E., Wheeler W.C., Martindale M.Q., Giribet G., Dunn C.W. 2009. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc. R. Soc. B 276:4261-4270.
36. Heled J., Drummond A.J. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:570-580.
37. Hirt R.P., Logsdon J.M., Healy B., Dorey M.W., Doolittle W.F., Embley T.M. 1999. Microsporidia are related to Fungi: evidence from the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II and other proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:580-585.
38. Huang H., Knowles L.L. 2009. What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics? Syst. Biol. 58:527-536.
39. Huelsenbeck J.P., Bull J.J., Cunningham C.W. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:152-158.
40. Jansen R.K., Cai Z., Raubeson L.A., Daniell H., dePamphilis C.W., Leebens-Mack J., Muller K.F., Guisinger-Bellian M., Haberle R.C., Hansen A.K., Chumley T.W., Lee S.-B., Peery R., McNeal J.R., Kuehl J.V., Boore J.L. 2007. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S.A. 104:19369-19374.
41. Jermiin L.S., Ho S.Y.W., Ababneh F., Robinson J., Larkum A.W.D. 2004. The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst. Biol. 53:638-643.
42. Jiao Y., Leebens-Mack J., Ayyampalayam S., Bowers J., McKain M., McNeal J., Rolf M., Ruzicka D., Wafula E., Wickett N., Wu X., Zhang Y., Wang J., Zhang Y., Carpenter E., Deyholos M., Kutchan T., Chanderbali A., Soltis P., Stevenson D., McCombie R., Pires J., Wong G., Soltis D., dePamphilis C. 2012. A genome triplication associated with early diversification of the core eudicots. Genome Biol. 13:R3.
43. Jiao Y., Wickett N.J., Ayyampalayam S., Chanderbali A.S., Landherr L., Ralph P.E., Tomsho L.P., Hu Y., Liang H., Soltis P.S., Soltis D.E., Clifton S.W., Schlarbaum S.E., Schuster S.C., Ma H., Leebens-Mack J., dePamphilis C.W. 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473:97-100.
44. Jukes T.H., Cantor C.R. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro H.N., editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York (NY): Academic Press. p. 21-132.
45. Kubatko L.S., Degnan J.H. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56:17-24.
46. Kubatko L.S., Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. 2009. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 25:971-973.
47. Lartillot N., Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixturemodel for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1095-1109.
48. Lartillot N., Rodrigue N., Stubbs D., Richer J. 2013. PhyloBayes MPI: phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment. Syst. Biol. 62:611-615.
49. Lee E.K., Cibrian-Jaramillo A., Kolokotronis S.O., Katari M.S., Stamatakis A., Ott M., Chiu J.C., Little D.P., Stevenson D.W., McCombie W.R., Martienssen R.A., Coruzzi G., DeSalle R. 2011. A functional phylogenomic view of the seed plants. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002411.
50. Leebens-Mack J., Raubeson L.A., Cui L.Y., Kuehl J.V., Fourcade M.H., Chumley T.W., Boore J.L., Jansen R.K., dePamphilis C.W. 2005. Identifying the basal angiosperm node in chloroplast genome phylogenies: sampling one's way out of the Felsenstein zone. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1948-1963.
51. Liu L., Edwards S.V. 2009. Phylogenetic analysis in the anomaly zone. Syst. Biol. 58:452-460.
52. Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 56:504-514.
53. Liu L., Yu L. 2010. Phybase: an R package for species tree analysis. Bioinformatics 26:962-963.
54. Liu L., Yu L., Edwards S.V. 2010. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Evol. Biol. 10:302.
55. Liu L., Yu L., Kubatko L., Pearl D.K., Edwards S.V. 2009a. Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 53:320-328.
56. Liu L., Yu L., Pearl D.K., Edwards S.V. 2009b. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst. Biol. 58:468-477.
57. Liu Q.P., Xue Q.Z. 2005. Comparative studies on codon usage pattern of chloroplasts and their host nuclear genes in four plant species. J. Genet. 84:55-62.
58. Magallón S., Castillo A. 2009. Angiosperm diversification through time. Am. J. Bot. 96:349-365.
59. Mathews S., Donoghue M.J. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286:947-950.
60. Moore M.J., Bell C.D., Soltis P.S., Soltis D.E. 2007. Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:19363-19368.
61. Moore M.J., Hassan N., Gitzendanner M.A., Bruenn R.A., Croley M., Vandeventer A., Horn J.W., Dhingra A., Brockington S.F., Latvis M., Ramdial J., Alexandre R., Piedrahita A., Xi Z., Davis C.C., Soltis P.S., Soltis D.E. 2011. Phylogenetic analysis of the plastid inverted repeat for 244 species: insights into deeper-level angiosperm relationships from a long, slowly evolving sequence region. Int. J. Plant Sci. 172:541-558.
62. Moore M.J., Soltis P.S., Bell C.D., Burleigh J.G., Soltis D.E. 2010. Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:4623-4628.
63. Nesnidal M.P., Helmkampf M., Bruchhaus I., Hausdorf B. 2010. Compositional heterogeneity and phylogenomic inference of metazoan relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:2095-2104.
64. Olsen G.J. 1987. Earliest phylogenetic branchings: comparing rRNA-based evolutionary trees inferred with various techniques. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 52:825-837.
65. Parkinson C.L., Adams K.L., Palmer J.D. 1999. Multigene analyses identify the three earliest lineages of extant flowering plants. Curr. Biol. 9:1485-1488.
66. Pfeil B.E., Schlueter J.A., Shoemaker R.C., Doyle J.J. 2005. Placing paleopolyploidy in relation to taxon divergence: a phylogenetic analysis in legumes using 39 gene families. Syst. Biol. 54:441-454.
67. Philippe H., Roure B. 2011. Difficult phylogenetic questions: more data, maybe; better methods, certainly. BMC Biol. 9:91.
68. Philippe H., Brinkmann H., Lavrov D.V., Littlewood D.T.J., Manuel M., Worheide G., Baurain D. 2011. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 9:e1000602.
69. Philippe H., Lopez P., Brinkmann H., Budin K., Germot A., Laurent J., Moreira D., Müller M., Le Guyader H. 2000. Early-branching or fast-evolving eukaryotes? An answer based on slowly evolving positions. Proc. R. Soc. B 267:1213-1221.
70. Pisani D. 2004. Identifying and removing fast-evolving sites using compatibility analysis: an example from the arthropoda. Syst. Biol. 53:978-989.
71. Qiu Y.L., Dombrovska O., Lee J., Li L.B., Whitlock B.A., Bernasconi-Quadroni F., Rest J.S., Davis C.C., Borsch T., Hilu K.W., Renner S.S., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Zanis M.J., Cannone J.J., Gutell R.R., Powell M., Savolainen V., Chatrou L.W., Chase M.W. 2005. Phylogenetic analyses of basal angiosperms based on nine plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear genes. Int. J. Plant Sci. 166:815-842.
72. Qiu Y.L., Lee J., Bernasconi-Quadroni F., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Zanis M., Zimmer E.A., Chen Z., Savolainen V., Chase M.W. 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analyses of five genes from three genomes. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161:S3-S27.
73. Qiu Y.L., Lee J., Bernasconi-Quadroni F., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Zanis M., Zimmer E.A., Chen Z.D., Savolainen V., Chase M.W. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402:404-407.
74. Qiu Y.L., Li L., Wang B., Xue J.-Y., Hendry T.A., Li R.-Q., Brown J.W., Liu Y., Hudson G.T., Chen Z.-D. 2010. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes. J. Syst. Evol. 48:391-425.
75. Rambaut A., Grassly N.C. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
76. Rannala B., Yang Z. 2003. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164:1645-1656.
77. Rosenberg N.A., Tao R. 2008. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees: the case of five taxa. Syst. Biol. 57:131-140.
78. Salemi M., Vandamme A.-M. 2003. The phylogenetic handbook: a practical approach to DNA and protein phylogeny. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79. Seo T.K. 2008. Calculating bootstrap probabilities of phylogeny using multilocus sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:960-971.
80. Sheffield N.C., Song H.J., Cameron S.L., Whiting M.F. 2009. Nonstationary evolution and compositional heterogeneity in beetle mitochondrial phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 58:381-394.
81. Shimodaira H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51:492-508.
82. Shimodaira H. 2008. Testing regions with nonsmooth boundaries via multiscale bootstrap. J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 138:1227-1241.
83. Shulaev V., Sargent D.J., Crowhurst R.N., Mockler T.C., Folkerts O., Delcher A.L., Jaiswal P., Mockaitis K., Liston A., Mane S.P., Burns P., Davis T.M., Slovin J.P., Bassil N., Hellens R.P., Evans C., Harkins T., Kodira C., Desany B., Crasta O.R., Jensen R.V., Allan A.C., Michael T.P., Setubal J.C., Celton J.-M., Rees D.J.G., Williams K.P., Holt S.H., Rojas J.J.R., Chatterjee M., Liu B., Silva H., Meisel L., Adato A., Filichkin S.A., Troggio M., Viola R., Ashman T.-L., Wang H., Dharmawardhana P., Elser J., Raja R., Priest H.D., Bryant D.W., Fox S.E., Givan S.A., Wilhelm L.J., Naithani S., Christoffels A., Salama D.Y., Carter J., Girona E.L., Zdepski A., Wang W., Kerstetter R.A., Schwab W., Korban S.S., Davik J., Monfort A., Denoyes-Rothan B., Arus P., Mittler R., Flinn B., Aharoni A., Bennetzen J.L., Salzberg S.L., Dickerman A.W., Velasco R., Borodovsky M., Veilleux R.E., Folta K.M. 2011. The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat. Genet. 43:109-116.
84. Smith S.A., Dunn C.W. 2008. Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments and molecular data. Bioinformatics 24:715-716.
85. Smith S.A., Beaulieu J.M., Donoghue M.J. 2010. An uncorrelated relaxed-clock analysis suggests an earlier origin for flowering plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:5897-5902.
86. Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S. 2004. Amborella not a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast. Am. J. Bot. 91:997-1001.
87. Soltis D.E., Bell C.D., Kim S., Soltis P.S. 2008. Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1133:3-25.
88. Soltis D.E., Gitzendanner M.A., Soltis P.S. 2007. A 567-taxon data set for angiosperms: the challenges posed by Bayesian analyses of large data sets. Int. J. Plant Sci. 168:137-157.
89. Soltis D.E., Smith S.A., Cellinese N., Wurdack K.J., Tank D.C., Brockington S.F., Refulio-Rodriguez N.F., Walker J.B., Moore M.J., Carlsward B.S., Bell C.D., Latvis M., Crawley S., Black C., Diouf D., Xi Z., Rushworth C.A., Gitzendanner M.A., Sytsma K.J., Qiu Y.L., Hilu K.W., Davis C.C., Sanderson M.J., Beaman R.S., Olmstead R.G., Judd W.S., Donoghue M.J., Soltis P.S. 2011. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. Am. J. Bot. 98:704-730.
90. Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Chase M.W., Mort M.E., Albach D.C., Zanis M., Savolainen V., Hahn W.H., Hoot S.B., Fay M.F., Axtell M., Swensen S.M., Prince L.M., Kress W.J., Nixon K.C., Farris J.S. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133:381-461.
91. Soltis P.S., Soltis D.E., Chase M.W. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402:402-404.
92. Song S., Liu L., Edwards S.V., Wu S. 2012. Resolving conflict in eutherian mammal phylogeny using phylogenomics and the multispecies coalescent model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:14942-14947.
93. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690.
94. Stefanović S., Rice D.W., Palmer J.D. 2004. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots?BMC Evol. Biol. 4:35.
95. Suyama M., Torrents D., Bork P. 2006. PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:W609-W612.
96. Tang H., Bowers J.E., Wang X., Paterson A.H. 2010. Angiosperm genome comparisons reveal early polyploidy in the monocot lineage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:472-477.
97. Wang H., Moore M.J., Soltis P.S., Bell C.D., Brockington S.F., Alexandre R., Davis C.C., Latvis M., Manchester S.R., Soltis D.E. 2009. Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:3853-3858.
98. Wasmuth J.D., Blaxter M.L. 2004. prot4EST: translating expressed sequence tags from neglected genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 5:187.
99. Whitfield J.B., Lockhart P.J. 2007. Deciphering ancient rapid radiations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:258-265.
100. Wikström N., Savolainen V., Chase M.W. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. B 268:2211-2220.
101. Wodniok S., Brinkmann H., Glockner G., Heidel A., Philippe H., Melkonian M., Becker B. 2011. Origin of land plants: do conjugating green algae hold the key? BMC Evol. Biol. 11:104.
102. Wu Y. 2012. Coalescent-based species tree inference from gene tree topologies under incomplete lineage sorting by maximum likelihood. Evolution 66:763-775.
103. Xi Z., Rest J.S., Davis C.C. 2013. Phylogenomics and coalescent analyses resolve extant seed plant relationships. PLoS One 8:e80870.
104. Xia X., Xie Z. 2001. DAMBE: software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. J. Hered. 92:371-373.
105. Xia X., Xie Z., Salemi M., Chen L., Wang Y. 2003. An index of substitution saturation and its application. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26:1-7.
106. Zanis M.J., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Mathews S., Donoghue M.J. 2002. The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:6848-6853.
107. Zhang N., Zeng L., Shan H., Ma H. 2012. Highly conserved low-copy nuclear genes as effective markers for phylogenetic analyses in angiosperms. New Phytol. 195:923-937.
108. Zhong B., Deusch O., Goremykin V.V., Penny D., Biggs P.J., Atherton R.A., Nikiforova S.V., Lockhart P.J. 2011. Systematic error in seed plant phylogenomics. Genome Biol. Evol. 3:1340-1348.
109. Zhong B., Liu L., Yan Z., Penny D. 2013. Origin of land plants using the multispecies coalescent model. Trends Plant Sci. 18:492-495.