The evolutionary root of flowering plants

Systematic Biology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 50-61

  Goremykin, Vadim V ^a   Nikiforova, Svetlana V ^a   Biggs, Patrick J ^b   Zhong, Bojian ^b   Delange, Peter ^c   Martin, William ^d   Woetzel, Stefan ^e   Atherton, Robin A ^b   McLenachan, Patricia A ^b   Lockhart, Peter J ^b  

^a RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^c DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION   (New Zealand)

^d Institut für Botanik III Heinrich   (Germany)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PLANT BREEDING RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

angiosperm origins; base compositional heterogeneity; chloroplast genome; data model fit; heterotachy; Trithuria inconspicua

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; CONIFER; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ANGIOSPERMS; CONIFEROPHYTA; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

AMBORELLA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NYMPHAEACEAE; SPERMATOPHYTA; TRITHURIA;

EID: 84871839724     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys070     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ababneh F., Jermiin L. S., Ma C., Robinson J. 2006. Matched-pairs tests of homogeneity with applications to homologous nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1225-1231.
2. Ane C., Burleigh J. G., McMahon M. M., Sanderson M. J. 2005. Covarion structure in plastid genome evolution: a new statistical test. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:914-924.
3. Atherton R. A., McComish B. J., Shepherd L. D., Berry L. A., Albert N. W., Lockhart P. J. 2010. Whole genome sequencing of enriched chloroplast DNA using the Illumina GAII platform. Plant Methods. 6:22.
4. Barkman T. J., Chenery G., McNeal J. R., Lyons-Weiler J., Ellisens W. J., Moore G., Wolfe A. D., dePamphilis C. W. 2000. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:13166-13171.
5. Braukmann T. W., Kuzmina M., Stefanovié S. 2009. Loss of all plastid ndh genes in Gnetales and conifers: extent and evolutionary significance for the seed plant phylogeny. Curr. Genet. 55:323-337.
6. Brinkmann H., Philippe H. 1999. Archaea sister group of Bacteria Indications fromtree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:817-825.
7. Bruno W. J., Halpern A. L. 1999. Topological bias and inconsistency of maximum likelihood using wrong models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:564-566.
8. Bryant D., Moulton V. (2004). Neighbor-Net: an agglomerativemethod for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:255-265.
9. Burleigh J. G., Mathews S. 2004. Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life. Am. J. Bot. 91:1599-1613.
10. Chaw S.-M., Chang C.-C., Chen H.-L., Li W.-H. 2004. Dating the monocot-dicot divergence and the origin of core eudicots using whole chloroplast genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 58:424-441.
11. Degnan J. H., Rosenberg N. A. 2009. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:332-340.
12. Drummond A. J., Ashton B., Buxton S., Cheung M., Cooper A., Heled J., Kearse M., Moir R., Stones-Havas S., Sturrock S., Thierer T., Wilson A. 2010. Geneious v5. 1, Available from: URL http://www. geneious. com.
13. Edgar R. C. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMCBioinformatics 5:113.
14. Felsenstein J. 2004. PHYLIP(Phylogeny InferencePackage). Version 3. 6. Distributed by the author. Seattle: Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington.
15. Finet C., Timme R. E., Delwiche C. F., Marletaz F. 2010. Multigene phylogeny of the green lineage reveals the origin and diversification of land plants. Curr. Biol. 20:2217-2222.
16. Goremykin V., Holland B., Hirsch-Ernst K., Hellwig F. 2005. Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1813-1822.
17. Goremykin V. V., Hirsch-Ernst K. I., Woelfl S., Hellwig F. H. 2003. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal Angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1499-1505.
18. Goremykin V. V., Hirsch-Ernst K. I., Woelfl S., Hellwig F. 2004. The chloroplast genome of Nymphaea alba: whole-genome analyses and the problem of identifying the most basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1445-1454.
19. Goremykin V. V., Nikiforova S. V., Bininda-Emonds O. R. P. 2010. Automated removal of noisy data in phylogenomic analyses. J. Mol. Evol. 71:319-331.
20. Graham S. W., Iles W. J. D. 2009. Different gymnospermoutgroups have (mostly) congruent signal regarding the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 96:216-227.
21. Gruenheit N., Lockhart P. J., Steel M. A., Martin W. 2008. Difficulties in testing for covarion-like properties of sequences under the confounding influence of changing proportions of variable sites Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1512-1520.
22. Guindon S., Dufayard J. F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximumlikelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3. 0. Syst. Biol. 59:307-321.
23. Hansmann S., Martin W. T. 2000. Phylogeny of 33 ribosomal and six other proteins encoded in an ancient gene cluster that is conserved across prokaryotic genomes: influence of excluding poorly alignable sites from analysis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50: 1655-1663.
24. Hirt R. P., Logsdon J. M., Healy B., Dorey M. W., Doolittle W. F., Embley T. M. 1999. Microsporidia are related to Fungi: evidence from the largest subunit ofRNApolymerase II and other proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:580-585.
25. Ho J. W. K., Adams C. E., Lew J. B., Matthews T. J., Ng C. C., Shahabi-Sirjani A., Tan L. H., Zhao Y., Easteal S., Wilson S. R., Jermiin L. S. 2006. SeqVis: visualization of compositional heterogeneity in large alignments of nucleotides. Bioinformatics 22:2162-2163.
26. Huson D. H., Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:254-267.
27. Jansen R. K., Cai Z., Raubeson L. A., Daniell H., dePamphilis C. W., Leebens-Mack J., Mueller K. F., Guisinger-Bellian M., Haberle R. C., Hansen A. K., Chumley T. W., Lee S.-B., Peery R., McNeal J. R., Kuehl J. V., Boore J. L. 2007. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:19369-19374.
28. Jermiin L., Ho S. Y. W., Ababneh F., Robinson J., Larkum A. W. D. 2004. The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst. Biol. 53:638-643.
29. Jiao Y., Wickett N. J., Ayyampalayam S., Chanderbali S., Landherr L., Ralph P. E., Tomsho L. P., Hu Y., Liang H., Soltis P. S., Soltis D. E., Clifton S. W., Schlarbaum S. E., Schuster S. C., Ma H., Leebens-Mack J., dePamphilis C. W. 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473:97-100.
30. Lartillot N., Philippe H. 2004. Abayesian mixturemodel for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1095-1109.
31. Leebens-Mack J., Raubeson L. A., Cui L., Kuehl J. V., Fourcade M. H., Chumley T. W., Boore J. L., Jansen R. K., dePamphilis C. W. 2005. Identifying the basal angiosperm node in chloroplast genome phylogenies: sampling one's way out of the Felsenstein zone. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1948-1963.
32. Lockhart P. J., Beanland T. J., Howe C. J., Larkum A. W. D. 1992. Sequence of Prochloron didemni atpBE and the inference of chloroplast origin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:2742-2746.
33. Lockhart P. J., Larkum A. W. D Steel M. A., Waddell P. J., Penny D. 1996. Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: the problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:1930-1934.
34. Lockhart P. J., Novis P., Milligan B. G., Riden J., Rambaut A., Larkum A. W. D. 2006. Heterotachy and tree building: a case study with plastids and Eubacteria Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:40-45.
35. Lockhart P. J., Penny D. 2005. The place of Amborella within the radiation of angiosperms. Trends Plant Sci. 10:201-202.
36. Lopez P., Forterre P., Philippe H. 1999. The root of the tree of life in the light of the covarion model. J. Mol. Evol. 49:496-508.
37. Martin W. T., Deusch O., Stawski N., Gruenheit N., Goremykin V. 2005. Chloroplast genome phylogenetics:whywe need independent approaches to plant molecular evolution. Trends Plant Sci. 10: 203-205.
38. Mathews S., Donoghue M. J. 1999. The root of Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286:947-950.
39. Nguyen M. A. T., Klaere S., von Haeseler A. 2011. MISFITS: evaluating the goodness of fit between a phylogenetic model and an alignment. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:143-152.
40. Philippe H., Brinkmann H., Lavrov D. V., Littlewood D. T. J., Manuel M., Woerheide G., Baurain D. 2011. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 9:e1000602.
41. Pisani D. 2004. Identifying and removing fast-evolving sites using compatibility analysis: an example from the Arthropoda. Syst. Biol. 53:978-989.
42. Posada D., Crandall K. A. 1998. MODELTEST: testing themodel ofDNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
43. Qiu Y.-L., Lee J., Bernasconi-Quadroni F., Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S., Zanis M., Zimmer E. A., Chen Z., Savolainen V., Chase M. W. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402:404-407.
44. Qiu Y.-L., Wang B., Xue J.-Y., Hendry T. A., Li R.-Q., Brown J. W., Liu Y., Hudson G. T., Chen Z.-D. 2010. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes. J. Syst. Evol. 48: 391-425.
45. Rambaut A. 2002. Se-Al. Sequence Alignment Editor v2. 0a11. Available from: URL http://evolve. zoo. ox. ac. uk.
46. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N., Brinkmann H., Roure B., Lartillot N., Lang B. F., Philippe H. 2007. Detecting and overcoming systematic errors in genome-scale phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 56:389-399.
47. Ruiz-Trillo I., Riutort M., Littlewood D. T., Herniou E. A., Baguna J. 1999. Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian metazoans, notmembers of Platyhelminthes. Science 283:1919-1923.
48. Saarela J. M., Rai H. S., Doyle J. A., Endress P. K., Mathews S., Marchant A. D., Briggs B. G., Graham S. W. 2007. Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree. Nature 446:5-8.
49. Schmidt H. A., Strimmer K., Vingron M., von Haeseler A. 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18: 502-504.
50. Shavit L., Penny D., Hendy M. D., Holland B. R. 2007. The problem of rooting rapid radiations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:2400-2411.
51. Soltis D. E., Smith S. A., Cellinese N., Wurdack K. J., Tank D. C., Brockington S. F., Refulio-Rodriguez N. F., Walker J. B., Moore M. J., Carlsward B. S., Bell C. D., Latvis M., Crawley S., Black C., Diouf D., Xi Z., Rushworth C. A., Gitzendanner M. A., Sytsma K. J., Qiu Y. L., Hilu K. W., Davis C. C., Sanderson M. J., Beaman R. S., Olmstead R. G., Judd W. S., Donoghue M. J., Soltis P. S. 2011. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. Am. J. Bot. 98:704-730.
52. Soltis D. E., Soltis P. E. 2004. Amborella not a basal angiosperm Not so fast. Am. J. Bot. 91:997-1001.
53. Sperling E. A., Peterson K. J., Pisani D. 2009. Phylogenetic-signal dissection of nuclear housekeeping genes supports the paraphyly of sponges and the monophyly of eumetazoa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:2261-2274.
54. Stamatakis A., Ludwig T., Meier H. 2005. RAxML-III: a fast program formaximumlikelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 21:456-463.
55. Stefanovié S., Rice D. W., Palmer J. D. 2004. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots BMC Evol. Biol. 4:35.
56. Sullivan J., Holsinger K. E., Simon C. 1995. Among-site variation and phylogenetic analysis of 12S rRNA in Sigmodontine rodents. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:988-1001.
57. Sun G., Dilcher D. L., Wang H., Chen Z. 2011. A eudicot from the Early Cretaceous of China. Nature 471:625-628.
58. Swofford D. L. 2002. PAUP*;. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*;and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
59. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731-2739.
60. Tuffley C., Steel M. A. 1998. Modelling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution. Math. BioSci. 147:63-91.
61. Wakasugi T., Tsudzukit J., Itot S., Nakashimat K., Tsudzuki T. 1994. Loss of all ndh genes as determined by sequencing the entire chloroplast genome of the black pine Pinus thunbergii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:9794-9798.
62. Whitfield J. B., Lockhart P. J. 2007. Deciphering ancient rapid radiations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:258-265.
63. Wu C.-S., Wang Y.-N., Liu S.-M., Chaw S.-M. 2007. Chloroplast genome (cpDNA) of Cycas taitungensis and 56 cp protein-coding genes of Gnetum parvifolium: insights into cpDNA evolution and phylogeny of extant seed plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1366-1379.
64. Yang Z. 2006. Computational Molecular Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
65. Zanis M. J., Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S., Mathews S., Donoghue M. J. 2002. The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:6848-6853.
66. Zerbino D. R., Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18: 821-829.
67. Zhong B., Deusch O., Goremykin V. V., Penny D., Biggs P. J., Atherton R. A., Nikiforova S. V., Lockhart P. J. 2011. Systematic error in seed plant phylogenomics. Genome Biol. Evol. 3: 1340-1348.