A transcriptomic approach to ribbon worm systematics (nemertea): Resolving the pilidiophora problem

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 3206-3215

  Andrade, Sónia C S ^a,b   Montenegro, Horácio ^b   Strand, Malin ^c   Schwartz, Megan L ^d   Kajihara, Hiroshi ^e   Norenburg, Jon L ^f   Turbeville, James M ^g   Sundberg, Per ^h   Giribet, Gonzalo ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^g VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Concatenation; Illumina; Neonemertea; Palaeonemertea; Phylogeny; Pilidiophora; Supermatrix

Indexed keywords

FEASIBILITY STUDY; MONOPHYLY; NEMERTEA; NONHUMAN; TAXONOMY; ANIMAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE; GENETICS; INVERTEBRATE; METABOLISM; PHYLOGENY;

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENES; INVERTEBRATES; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84919809422     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu253     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Andrade SCS, Strand M, Schwartz M, Chen H-X, Kajihara H, vonDöhren J, Sun S-C, Junoy J, Thiel M, Norenburg JL, et al. 2012. Disentangling ribbon worm relationships: multi-locus analysis supports traditional classification of the phylum Nemertea. Cladistics 28: 141-159.
2. Betancur-R. R, Naylor G, Ortí G. 2014. Conserved genes, sampling error, and phylogenomic inference. Syst Biol. 63:257-262.
3. Bleidorn C, Podsiadlowski L, Zhong M, Eeckhaut I, Hartmann S, Halanych KM, Tiedemann R. 2009. On the phylogenetic position of Myzostomida: can 77 genes get it wrong? BMC Evol Biol. 9:150.
4. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972-1973.
5. Chen H-X, Sun S-C, Sundberg P, Ren W-C, Norenburg JL. 2012. A comparative study of nemertean complete mitochondrial genomes, including two new ones for Nectonemertes cf. mirabilis and Zygeupolia rubens, may elucidate the fundamental pattern for the phylum Nemertea. BMC Genomics 13:139.
6. Chernyshev AV, Magarlamov TY, Turbeville JM. 2013. Morphology of the proboscis of Hubrechtella juliae (Nemertea, Pilidiophora): implications for pilidiophoran monophyly. J Morphol. 274: 1397-1414.
7. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2011. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 27: 1164-1165.
8. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2:e68.
9. Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2005. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat Rev Genet. 6:361-375.
10. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, Seaver E, Rouse GW, Obst M, Edgecombe GD, et al. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745-749.
11. Edwards SV, Liu L, Pearl DK. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:5936-5941.
12. Fernández R, Hormiga G, Giribet G. 2014. Phylogenomic analysis of spiders reveals nonmonophyly of orb-weavers Curr Biol. 24 1772-1777.
13. Fernández R, Laumer CE, Vahtera V, Libro S, Kaluziak S, Sharma PP, Pérez-Porro AR, Edgecombe GD, Giribet G. 2014. Evaluating topological conflict in centipede phylogeny using transcriptomic data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 31:1500-1513.
14. Gibson R. 1995. Nemertean genera and species of the world: an annotated checklist of original names and description citations, synonyms, current taxonomic status, habitats and recorded zoogeographic distribution. J Nat Hist. 29:271-562.
15. Grünewald S, Spillner A, Bastkowski S, Bogershausen A, Moulton V. 2013. SuperQ: computing supernetworks from quartets. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 10:151-160.
16. Hartmann S, Helm C, Nickel B, Meyer M, Struck TH, Tiedemann R, Selbig J, Bleidorn C. 2012. Exploiting gene families for phylogenomic analysis of myzostomid transcriptome data. PLoS One 7:e29843.
17. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, Martinez P, Baguñá J, Bailly X, Jondelius U, et al. 2009. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomicmethods. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 276:4261-4270.
18. Heled J, Drummond AJ. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol. 27:570-580.
19. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 23:254-267.
20. Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Philippe H. 2006. Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence? Trends Genet. 22:225-231.
21. Kajihara H, Chernyshev AV, Sun S-C, Sundberg P, Crandall FB. 2008. Checklist of nemertean genera and species published between 1995-2007. Species Div. 13:245-274.
22. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:511-518.
23. Katoh K, Toh H. 2008. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform. 9:286-298.
24. Kocot KM, Cannon JT, Todt C, Citarella MR, Kohn AB, Meyer A, Santos SR, Schander C, Moroz LM, Lieb B, et al. 2011. Phylogenomics reveals deep molluscan relationships. Nature 477:452-456.
25. Kvist S, Laumer CE, Junoy J, Giribet G. 2014. New insights into the phylogeny, systematics and DNA barcoding of Nemertea. Invertebr Syst. 28:287-308.
26. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2008. Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363:1463-1472.
27. Le SQ, Dang CC, Gascuel O. 2012. Modeling protein evolution with several amino acid replacement matrices depending on site rates. Mol Biol Evol. 29:2921-2936.
28. Leigh JW, Schliep K, Lopez P, Bapteste E. 2011. Let them fall where they may: congruence analysis in massive phylogenetically messy data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 28:2773-2785.
29. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. 2003. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13:2178-2189.
30. Liu L, Pearl DK, Brumfield RT, Edwards SV. 2008. Estimating species trees using multiple-allele DNA sequence data. Evolution 62:2080-2091.
31. Liu L, Yu LL, Pearl DK, Edwards SV. 2009. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst Biol. 58:468-477.
32. Maslakova SA. 2010a. Development to metamorphosis of the nemertean pilidium larva. Front Zool. 7:30.
33. Maslakova SA. 2010b. The invention of the pilidium larva in an otherwise perfectly good spiralian phylum Nemertea. Int Comp Biol. 50: 734-743.
34. McCormack JE, Heled J, Delaney KS, Peterson AT, Knowles LL. 2011. Calibrating divergence times on species trees versus gene trees: implications for speciation history of Aphelocoma jays. Evolution 65: 184-202.
35. McIntosh WC. 1873-1874. A monograph of the British annelids. Part 1 The nemerteans. London: Ray Society.
36. Meusemann K, von Reumont BM, Simon S, Roeding F, Strauss S, Kück P, Ebersberger I,Walzl M, Pass G, Breuers S, et al. 2010. A phylogenomic approach to resolve the arthropod tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 27: 2451-2464.
37. Nosenko T, Schreiber F, Adamska M, Adamski M, Eitel M, Hammel J, Maldonado M, Müller WEG, Nickel M, Schierwater B, et al. 2013. Deep metazoan phylogeny: when different genes tell different stories. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 67:223-233.
38. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, Littlewood DTJ, Manuel M, Wörheide G, Baurain D. 2011. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 9: e1000602.
39. Pick KS, Philippe H, Schreiber F, Erpenbeck D, Jackson DJ, Wrede P, Wiens M, Alie A, Morgenstern B, Manuel M, et al. 2010. Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships. Mol Biol Evol. 27:1983-1987.
40. Rehm P, Borner J, Meusemann K, von Reumont BM, Simon S, Hadrys H, Misof B, Burmester T. 2011. Dating the arthropod tree based on large-scale transcriptome data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 61:880-887.
41. Riesgo A, Andrade SC, Sharma PP, Novo M, Pérez-Porro AR, Vahtera V, González VL, Kawauchi GY, Giribet G. 2012. Comparative description of ten transcriptomes of newly sequenced invertebrates and efficiency estimation of genomic sampling in non-model taxa. Front Zool. 9:33.
42. Riesgo A, Pérez-Porro AR, Carmona S, Leys SP, Giribet G. 2012. Optimization of preservation and storage time of sponge tissues to obtain quality mRNA for next-generation sequencing. Mol Ecol Resour. 12:312-322.
43. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61:539-542.
44. Roure B, Baurain D, Philippe H. 2013. Impact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 30:197-214.
45. Salichos L, Rokas A. 2011. Evaluating ortholog prediction algorithms in a yeast model clade. PLoS One 6:e18755.
46. Salichos L, Rokas A. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497:327-331.
47. Salichos L, Stamatakis A, Rokas A. 2014. Novel information theory-based measures for quantifying incongruence among phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 31:1261-1271.
48. Satler JD, Starrett J, Hayashi CY, Hedin M. 2011. Inferring species trees from gene trees in a radiation of California trapdoor spiders (Araneae, Antrodiaetidae, Aliatypus). PLoS One 6:e25355.
49. Schultze MS. 1851. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte den Turbellarien. Greifswald (Germany): C.A. Koch.
50. Schulz MH, Zerbino DR, Vingron M, Birney E. 2012. Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics 28:1086-1092.
51. Sharma PP, Kaluziak S, Pérez-Porro AR, González VL, Hormiga G, Wheeler WC, Giribet G. 2014. Phylogenomic interrogation of Chelicerata reveals systemic conflicts in phylogenetic signal. Mol Biol Evol. 31:2963-2984.
52. Smith S, Wilson NG, Goetz F, Feehery C, Andrade SCS, Rouse GW, Giribet G, Dunn CW. 2011. Resolving the evolutionary relationships of molluscs with phylogenomic tools. Nature 480:364-367.
53. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690.
54. Stiasny-Wijnhoff G. 1936. Die Polystilifera der Siboga-Expedition. Siboga Exped. 22:1-214.
55. Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hösel C, Kube M, Lieb B, Meyer A, Tiedemann R, Purschke G, et al. 2011. Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471:95-98.
56. Struck TH, Wey-Fabrizius AR, Golombek A, Hering L, Weigert A, Bleidorn C, Klebow S, Iakovenko N, Hausdorf B, Petersen M, et al. 2014. Platyzoan paraphyly based on phylogenomic data supports a non-coelomate ancestry of Spiralia. Mol Biol Evol. 31:1833-1849.
57. Sundberg P, Strand M. 2007. Annulonemertes (phylum Nemertea): when segments do not count. Biol Lett. 3:570-573.
58. Sundberg P, Turbeville JM, Lindh S. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships among higher nemertean (Nemertea) taxa inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 20:327-334.
59. Thollesson M, Norenburg JL. 2003. Ribbon worm relationships: a phylogeny of the phylum Nemertea. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 270: 407-415.
60. Turbeville JM. 2002. Progress in nemertean biology: development and phylogeny. Integr Comp Biol. 42:692-703.
61. von Reumont BM, Jenner RA, Wills MA, Dell'Ampio E, Pass G, Ebersberger I, Meyer B, Koenemann S, Iliffe TM, Stamatakis A, et al. 2012. Pancrustacean phylogeny in the light of new phylogenomic data: support for Remipedia as the possible sister group of Hexapoda. Mol Biol Evol. 29:1031-1045.
62. Wasmuth JD, Blaxter ML. 2004. prot4EST: translating expressed sequence tags from neglected genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 5:187.
63. Wenzel JW, Siddall ME. 1999. Noise. Cladistics 15:51-64.
64. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821-829.