Evaluating topological conflict in centipede phylogeny using transcriptomic data sets

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1500-1513

  Fernández, Rosa ^a   Laumer, Christopher E ^a   Vahtera, Varpu ^a,b   Libro, Silvia ^c   Kaluziak, Stefan ^c   Sharma, Prashant P ^d   Pérez Porro, Alicia R ^a,e   Edgecombe, Gregory D ^f   Giribet, Gonzalo ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^c NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^e CENTRE D ESTUDIS AVANÇATS DE BLANES CEAB CSIC   (Spain)

^f DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chilopoda; Illumina; incongruence; molecular dating; Myriapoda; next generation sequencing; phylogenomics

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CENTIPEDE; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; CRATEROSTIGMOMORPHA; FOSSIL; GENE FREQUENCY; HYPOTHESIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; MYRIAPODA; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PLEUROSTIGMOPHORAN; SISTER GROUP; TAXON; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BAYES THEOREM; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84901423154     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu108     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Altenhoff AM, Gil M, Gonnet GH, Dessimoz C. 2013. Inferring hierarchical orthologous groups from orthologous gene pairs. PLoS One 8: e53786.
2. Altenhoff AM, Schneider A, Gonnet GH, Dessimoz C. 2011. OMA 2011: orthology inference among 1000 complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D289-D294.
3. Anderson LI, Trewin NH. 2003. An Early Devonian arthropod fauna from the Windyfield Cherts, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Palaeontology 46: 457-509.
4. Ax P. 2000. Multicellular animals, Volume II. The phylogenetic system of the Metazoa. Berlin (Germany): Springer.
5. Berger SA, Krompass D, Stamatakis A. 2011. Performance, accuracy, and Web server for evolutionary placement of short sequence reads under maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 60:291-302.
6. Betancur R R, Naylor G, Ortí G. 2014. Conserved genes, sampling error, and phylogenomic inference. Syst Biol. 63:257-262.
7. Bleidorn C, Podsiadlowski L, Zhong M, Eeckhaut I, Hartmann S, Halanych KM, Tiedemann R. 2009. On the phylogenetic position of Myzostomida: can 77 genes get it wrong? BMC Evol Biol. 9:150.
8. Borucki H. 1996. Evolution und phylogenetisches system der Chilopoda (Mandibulata, Tracheata). Vehr naturwiss Ver Hamburg. 35:95-226.
9. Dell'Ampio E, Meusemann K, Szucsich NU, Peters RS, Meyer B, Borner J, Petersen M, Aberer AJ, Stamatakis A,Walzl MG, et al. 2014. Decisive data sets in phylogenomics: lessons from studies on the phylogenetic relationships of primarily wingless insects. Mol Biol Evol. 31: 239-249.
10. Dohle W. 1985. Phylogenetic pathways in the Chilopoda. Bijdr Dierkunde. 55:55-66.
11. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, Seaver E, Rouse GW, Obst M, Edgecombe GD, et al. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745-749.
12. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
13. Edgecombe GD. 2011a. Chilopoda-phylogeny. In: Minelli A, editor. Treatise on zoology-anatomy, taxonomy, biology. The Myriapoda, Vol. 1. Leiden and Boston: Brill. p. 339-354.
14. Edgecombe GD. 2011b. Chilopoda-the fossil history. In: Minelli A, editor. Treatise on zoology-anatomy, taxonomy, biology. The Myriapoda, Vol. 1. Leiden and Boston: Brill. p. 355-361.
15. Edgecombe GD, Giribet G. 2004. Adding mitochondrial sequence data (16S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) to the phylogeny of centipedes (Myriapoda, Chilopoda): an analysis of morphology and four molecular loci. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 42:89-134.
16. Edgecombe GD, Giribet G. 2007. Evolutionary biology of centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda). Annu Rev Entomol. 52:151-170.
17. Edgecombe GD, Giribet G. 2008. A New Zealand species of the trans-Tasman centipede order Craterostigmomorpha (Arthropoda:Chilopoda) corroborated by molecular evidence. Invert Syst. 22:1-15.
18. Edgecombe GD, Giribet G, Wheeler WC. 1999. Phylogeny of Chilopoda: combining 18S and 28S rRNA sequences and morphology. Boletín Sociedad Entomol Aragonesa 26:293-331.
19. Edwards SV. 2009. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution 63:1-19.
20. Foster P. 2004. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst Biol. 53: 485-495.
21. Fu LM, Niu BF, Zhu ZW, Wu ST, Li WZ. 2012. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28: 3150-3152.
22. Giribet G, Carranza S, Riutort M, Baguñà J, Ribera C. 1999. Internal phylogeny of the Chilopoda (Myriapoda, Arthropoda) using complete 18S rDNA and partial 28S rDNA sequences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 354:215-222.
23. Giribet G, Edgecombe GD. 2006. Conflict between data sets and phylogeny of centipedes: an analysis based on seven genes and morphology. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 273:531-538.
24. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q, et al. 2011. Fulllength transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 29:644-652.
25. Grbic M, Van Leeuwen T, Clark RM, Rombauts S, Rouzé P, Grbić V, Osborne EJ, Dermauw W, Ngoc PC, Ortego F, et al. 2011. The genome of Tetranychus urticae reveals herbivorous pest adaptations. Nature 479:487-492.
26. Grünewald S, Spillner A, Bastkowski S, Bogershausen A, Moulton V. 2013. SuperQ: computing supernetworks from quartets. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 10:151-160.
27. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M, et al. 2013. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 8: 1494-1512.
28. Hartmann S, Helm C, Nickel B, Meyer M, Struck TH, Tiedemann R, Selbig J, Bleidorn C. 2012. Exploiting gene families for phylogenomic analysis of myzostomid transcriptome data. PLoS One 7:e29843.
29. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, Martinez P, Baguñà J, Bailly X, Jondelius U, et al. 2009. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomicmethods. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 276:4261-4270.
30. Hilken G. 1997. Tracheal systems in Chilopoda: a comparison under phylogenetic aspects. Entomol Scand Suppl. 51:49-60.
31. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 23:254-267.
32. Inoue J, Donoghue PCJ, Yang ZH. 2010. The impact of the representation of fossil calibrations on Bayesian estimation of species divergence times. Syst Biol. 59:74-89.
33. Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Philippe H. 2006. Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence? Trends Genet. 22:225-231.
34. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, et al. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647-1649.
35. Kennedy D. 2005. 125 [Editorial]. Science 309:19.
36. Koch M, Edgecombe GD. 2012. The preoral chamber in geophilomorph centipedes: comparative morphology, phylogeny, and the evolution of centipede feeding structures. Zool J Linn Soc. 165:1-62.
37. Kocot KM, Cannon JT, Todt C, Citarella MR, Kohn AB, Meyer A, Santos SR, Schander C, Moroz LL, Lieb B, et al. 2011. Phylogenomics reveals deep molluscan relationships. Nature 477:452-456.
38. Kubatko LS, Degnan JH. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst Biol. 56:17-24.
39. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10:R25.
40. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1095-1109.
41. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2008. Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363:1463-1472.
42. Lartillot N, Rodrigue N, Stubbs D, Richer J. 2013. PhyloBayes MPI: phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment. Syst Biol. 62:611-615.
43. Le SQ, Dang CC, Gascuel O. 2012. Modeling protein evolution with several amino acid replacement matrices depending on site rates. Mol Biol Evol. 29:2921-2936.
44. Lee MSY, Soubrier J, Edgecombe GD. 2013. Rates of phenotypic and genomic evolution during the Cambrian Explosion. Curr Biol. 23:1-7.
45. Leigh JW, Schliep K, Lopez P, Bapteste E. 2011. Let them fall where they may: congruence analysis in massive phylogenetically messy data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 28:2773-2785.
46. Lemmon AR, Brown JM, Stanger-Hall K, Lemmon EM. 2009. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst Biol. 58: 130-145.
47. Mallatt J, Giribet G. 2006. Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 40:772-794.
48. Meusemann K, von Reumont BM, Simon S, Roeding F, Strauss S, Kück P, Ebersberger I,Walzl M, Pass G, Breuers S, et al. 2010. A phylogenomic approach to resolve the arthropod tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 27: 2451-2464.
49. Müller CHG, Meyer-Rochow VB. 2006. Fine structural organization of the lateral ocelli in two species of Scolopendra (Chilopoda: Pleurostigmophora): an evolutionary evaluation. Zoomorphology 125:13-26.
50. Murienne J, Edgecombe GD, Giribet G. 2010. Including secondary structure, fossils and molecular dating in the centipede tree of life. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 57:301-313.
51. Nosenko T, Schreiber F, Adamska M, Adamski M, Eitel M, Hammel J, MaldonadoM,MüllerWE, Nickel M, Schierwater B, et al. 2013. Deep metazoan phylogeny: when different genes tell different stories. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 67:223-233.
52. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, Littlewood DTJ, Manuel M, Wörheide G, Baurain D. 2011. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 9: e1000602.
53. Philippe H, TelfordMJ. 2006. Large-scale sequencing and the new animal phylogeny. Trends Ecol Evol. 21:614-620.
54. Pick KS, Philippe H, Schreiber F, Erpenbeck D, Jackson DJ, Wrede P, Wiens M, Alié A, Morgenstern B, Manuel M, et al. 2010. Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships. Mol Biol Evol. 27: 1983-1987.
55. Pocock RI. 1902. A new and annectant type of chilopod. Quart J Microsc Sci. 45:417-448.
56. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490.
57. Prunescu C-C, Prunescu P. 1996. Supernumerary Malpighian tubules in chilopods. Acta Myriapodol. 169:437-440.
58. Prunescu C-C, Prunescu P. 2006. Rudimentary supernumerary Malpighian tubules in the order Craterostigmomorpha Pocock 1902. Norwegian J Entomol. 53:113-118.
59. Regier JC, Shultz JW, Zwick A, Hussey A, Ball B, Wetzer R, Martin JW, Cunningham CW. 2010. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 463: 1079-1083.
60. Regier JC, Wilson HM, Shultz JW. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of Myriapoda using three nuclear protein-coding genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 34:147-158.
61. Rehm P, Borner J, Meusemann K, von Reumont BM, Simon S, Hadrys H, Misof B, Burmester T. 2011. Dating the arthropod tree based on large-scale transcriptome data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 61:880-887.
62. Rota-Stabelli O, Daley AC, Pisani D. 2013. Molecular timetrees reveal a Cambrian colonization of land and a new scenario for ecdysozoan evolution. Curr Biol. 23:392-398.
63. Roure B, Baurain D, Philippe H. 2013. Impact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 30:197-214.
64. Salichos L, Rokas A. 2011. Evaluating ortholog prediction algorithms in a yeast model clade. PLoS One 6:e18755.
65. Salichos L, Rokas A. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497:327-331.
66. Salichos L, Stamatakis A, Rokas A. 2014. Novel information theory-based measures for quantifying incongruence among phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 31(5):1261-1271.
67. Shear WA, Bonamo PM. 1988. Devonobiomorpha, a new order of centipeds (Chilopoda) from the middle Devonian of Gilboa, New York State, USA, and the phylogeny of centiped orders. Am Mus Novitates. 2927:1-30.
68. Shear WA, Edgecombe GD. 2010. The geological record and phylogeny of Myriapoda. Arthropod Struct Dev. 39:174-190.
69. Shear WA, Jeram AJ, Selden PA. 1998. Centiped legs (Arthropoda, Chilopoda, Scutigeromorpha) from the Silurian and Devonian of Britain and the Devonian of North America. Am Mus Novitates. 3231:1-16.
70. Shultz JW, Regier JC. 1997. Progress toward a molecular phylogeny of the centipede orders (Chilopoda). Entomol Scand Suppl. 51:25-32.
71. Smith S, Wilson NG, Goetz F, Feehery C, Andrade SCS, Rouse GW, Giribet G, Dunn CW. 2011. Resolving the evolutionary relationships of molluscs with phylogenomic tools. Nature 480:364-367.
72. Smith SA, Dunn CW. 2008. Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments and molecular data. Bioinformatics 24:715-716.
73. Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hösel C, Kube M, Lieb B, Meyer A, Tiedemann R, Purschke G, et al. 2011. Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471:95-98.
74. Sukumaran J, Holder MT. 2010. DendroPy: a Python library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics 26:1569-1571.
75. Verhoeff KW. 1902-1925. Gliederfüssler: Arthropoda: Klasse Chilopoda. In: Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs 5, abt. 2, Buch 1. Leipzig (Germany): Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft. 725.
76. von Reumont BM, Jenner RA, Wills MA, Dell'ampio E, Pass G, Ebersberger I, Meyer B, Koenemann S, Iliffe TM, Stamatakis A, et al. 2012. Pancrustacean phylogeny in the light of new phylogenomic data: support for Remipedia as the possible sister group of Hexapoda. Mol Biol Evol. 29:1031-1045.
77. Wilson HM, Anderson LI. 2004. Morphology and taxonomy of Paleozoic millipedes (Diplopoda: Chilognatha: Archipolypoda) from Scotland. J Paleontol. 78:169-184.
78. Wirkner CS, Pass G. 2002. The circulatory system in Chilopoda: functional morphology and phylogenetic aspects. Acta Zool. 83: 193-202.
79. Wu M, Chatterji S, Eisen JA. 2012. Accounting for alignment uncertainty in phylogenomics. PLoS One 7:e30288.
80. Yang Z, Rannala B. 2006. Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Mol Biol Evol. 23:212-226.
81. Zoller S, Schneider A. 2013. Improving phylogenetic inference with a semiempirical amino acid substitution model. Mol Biol Evol. 30: 469-479.