Platyzoan paraphyly based on phylogenomic data supports a noncoelomate ancestry of spiralia

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1833-1849

  Struck, Torsten H ^a,b   Wey Fabrizius, Alexandra R ^c   Golombek, Anja ^a   Hering, Lars ^d   Weigert, Anne ^d   Bleidorn, Christoph ^d   Klebow, Sabrina ^c   Iakovenko, Nataliia ^e,f   Hausdorf, Bernhard ^g   Petersen, Malte ^a   Kück, Patrick ^a   Herlyn, Holger ^c   Hankeln, Thomas ^c  

^a ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSMUSEUM ALEXANDER KOENIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^c JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

^f SCHMALHAUSEN INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (Ukraine)

^g UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANNELID; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BILATERIA; BRACHIOPODA; BRYOZOA; CYCLIOPHORA; ECDYSOZOA; ENTOPROCTA; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; GASTROTRICHA; GNATHIFERA; GNATHOSTOMULIDA; LAST COMMON ANCESTOR; LONG BRANCH ATTRACTION; MOLLUSC; MONOPHYLY; NEMERTEA; NONHUMAN; PARAPHYLY; PHYLOGENOMICS; PLATYHELMINTH; PLATYZOA; ROUPHOZOA; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPIRALIA; TAXON; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; HELMINTH; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, HELMINTH; GENOMICS; HELMINTHS; PHYLOGENY; PLATYHELMINTHS;

EID: 84903701024     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu143     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Ahlrichs WH. 1997. Epidermal ultrastructure of Seison nebaliae and Seison annulatus, and a comparison of epidermal structures within Gnathifera. Zoomorphology 117:41-48.
2. Alexe G, Vijaya Satya R, Seiler M, Platt D, Bhanot T, Hui S, Tanaka M, Levine AJ, Bhanot G. 2008. PCA and clustering reveal alternate mtDNA phylogeny of N and M clades. J Mol Evol. 67:465-487.
3. Bapteste E, Susko E, Leigh J, MacLeod D, Charlebois RL, Doolittle WF 2005. Do orthologous gene phylogenies really support tree-Thinking? BMC Evol Biol. 5:33.
4. Bergsten J. 2005. A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics 21: 163-193. (Pubitemid 40817232)
5. Bernt M, Bleidorn C, Braband A, Dambach J, Donath A, Fritzsch G, Golombek A, Hadrys H, Juhling F, Meusemann K, et al. 2013. A comprehensive analysis of bilaterian mitochondrial genomes and phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:352-364.
6. Birney E, ClampM, Durbin R. 2004. Genewise and genomewise. Genome Res. 14:988-995. (Pubitemid 38660520)
7. Bleidorn C. 2007. The role of character loss in phylogenetic reconstruction as exemplified for the Annelida. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 45:299-307. (Pubitemid 47620472)
8. Brinkman H, Philippe H. 2008. Animal phylogeny and large-scale sequencing: Progress and pitfalls. J Syst Evol. 46:274-286.
9. Cavalier-Smith T. 1998. A revised six-kingdom system of life. Biol Rev. 73: 203-266. (Pubitemid 28474673)
10. Chesebro JE, Pueyo JI, Couso JP. 2013. Interplay between a Wntdependent organiser and the Notch segmentation clock regulates posterior development in Periplaneta americana. Biol Open. 2: 227-237.
11. Chipman AD. 2010. Parallel evolution of segmentation by co-option of ancestral gene regulatory networks. Bioessays 32:60-70.
12. Couso JP. 2009. Segmentation, metamerism and the Cambrian explosion. Int J Dev Biol. 53:1305-1316.
13. Davidson EH, Erwin DH. 2006. Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans. Science 311:796-800.
14. De Robertis EM. 2008. The molecular ancestry of segmentation mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105:16411-16412.
15. Doe D. 1981. Comparative ultrastructure of the pharynx simplex in turbellaria. Zoomorphology 97:133-193.
16. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, Seaver E, Rouse GW, Obst M, Edgecombe GD, et al. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745-750.
17. Ebersberger I, Strauss S, von Haeseler A. 2009. HaMStR: Profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs. BMC Evol Biol. 9: 157.
18. Edgecombe G, Giribet G, Dunn C, Hejnol A, Kristensen R, Neves R, Rouse G, Worsaae K, Sørensen M. 2011. Higher-level metazoan relationships: Recent progress and remaining questions. Org Divers Evol. 11:151-172.
19. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool. 27:401-410.
20. Giribet G. 2008. Assembling the lophotrochozoan (=spiralian) tree of life. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363:1513-1522. (Pubitemid 351363984)
21. Halanych KM. 2004. The new view of animal phylogeny. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35:229-256. (Pubitemid 40059720)
22. Hannibal R, Patel N 2013. What is a segment? Evo Devo 4:35.
23. Haszprunar G. 1996. Plathelminthes and Plathelminthomorpha-paraphyletic taxa. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 34:41-48.
24. Hausdorf B, Helmkampf M, Meyer A, Witek A, Herlyn H, Bruchhaus I, Hankeln T, Struck TH, Lieb B. 2007. Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of Bryozoa comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta. Mol Biol Evol. 24:2723-2729.
25. Hausdorf B, Helmkampf M, Nesnidal MP, Bruchhaus I. 2010. Phylogenetic relationships within the lophophorate lineages (Ectoprocta, Brachiopoda, and Phoronida). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 55: 1121-1127.
26. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, Martinez P, Baguña J, Bailly X, Jondelius U, et al. 2009. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomicmethods. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 276:4261-4270.
27. Hering L, HenzeMJ, Kohler M, Kelber A, Bleidorn C, Leschke M, Nickel B, Meyer M, Kircher M, Sunnucks P, et al. 2012. Opsins in Onychophora (velvet worms) suggest a single origin and subsequent diversification of visual pigments in arthropods. Mol Biol Evol. 29: 3451-3458.
28. Herlyn H, Ehlers U. 1997. Ultrastructure and function of the pharynx of Gnathostomula paradoxa (Gnathostomulida). Zoomorphology 117:135.
29. Herlyn H, Rohrig H. 2003. Ultrastructure and overall organization of ligament sac, uterine bell, uterus and vagina in Paratenuisentis ambiguus (Acanthocephala, Eoacanthocephala)-The character evolution within the Acanthocephala. Acta Zool. 84:239-247. (Pubitemid 36933214)
30. Heuer C, Muller C, Todt C, Loesel R. 2010. Comparative neuroanatomy suggests repeated reduction of neuroarchitectural complexity in Annelida. Front Zool. 7:13.
31. Huelsenbeck JP. 1997. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? Syst Biol. 46: 69-74.
32. Hyman LH. 1951. The invertebrates. Vol. 2. Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela: The Acoelomate bilateria. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Jenner RA. 2004. Towards a phylogeny of the Metazoa: Evaluating alternative phylogenetic positions of Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and Gnathostomulida, with a critical reappraisal of cladistic characters. Cont Zool. 73:3-163. (Pubitemid 38157844)
34. Jenner RA. 2004. When molecules and morphology clash: Reconciling conflicting phylogenies of the Metazoa by considering secondary character loss. Evol Dev. 6:372-8. (Pubitemid 39283053)
35. Kapp H. 2000. The unique embryology of Chaetognatha. Zool Anz. 239: 263-266. (Pubitemid 32145549)
36. Katoh K, Kuma K-I, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: Improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:511-518. (Pubitemid 40360980)
37. Kieneke A, Riemann O, Ahlrichs WH. 2008. Novel implications for the basal internal relationships of Gastrotricha revealed by an analysis of morphological characters. Zool Scr. 37:429-460. (Pubitemid 351871590)
38. Kircher M, Sawyer S, Meyer M. 2011. Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011:1-8.
39. Kircher M, Stenzel U, Kelso J. 2009. Improved base calling for the Illumina Genome Analyzer using machine learning strategies. Genome Biol. 10:R83.
40. Koch M, Quast B, Bartolomaeus T. 2014. Coeloms and nephridia in annelids and arthropods. In: Wagele JW, Bartolomaeus T, editors. Deep metazoan phylogeny: The backbone of the tree of life-new insights from analyses of molecules, morphology, and theory of data analysis. Berlin (Germany): De Gruyter. p. 173-284.
41. Kuck P, Mayer C,Wagele J-W, Misof B. 2012. Long branch effects distort Maximum Likelihood phylogenies in simulations despite selection of the correct model. PLoS One 7:e36593.
42. Kuck P, Meusemann K. 2010. FASconCAT: Convenient handling of data matrices. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 56:1115-1118.
43. Kuck P, Meusemann K, Dambach J, Thormann B, von Reumont BM, Wagele JW, Misof B. 2010. Parametric and non-parametric masking of randomness in sequence alignments can be improved and leads to better resolved trees. Front Zool. 7:10.
44. Kuck P, Struck TH. 2014. BaCoCa-A heuristic software tool for the parallel assessment of sequence biases in hundreds of gene and taxon partitions. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 70:94-98.
45. Kvist S, Siddall ME. 2013. Phylogenomics of Annelida revisited: A cladistic approach using genome-wide expressed sequence tag data mining and examining the effects of missing data. Cladistics 29:435-448.
46. Lartillot N, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2007. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a siteheterogeneous model. BMC Evol Biol. 7:S4.
47. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-Acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1095-1109. (Pubitemid 38658218)
48. Lartillot N, Rodrigue N, Stubbs D, Richer J. 2013. PhyloBayes MPI: Phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment. Syst Biol. 62:611-615.
49. Lemmon AR, Brown JM, Stanger-Hall K, Lemmon EM. 2009. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference. Syst Biol. 58:130-145.
50. Loesel R. 2014. Brain complexity in protostomes. In: Wagele JW, Bartolomaeus T, editors. Deep metazoan phylogeny: The backbone of the tree of life-new insights from analyses of molecules, morphology, and theory of data analysis. Berlin (Germany): De Gruyter. p. 79-91.
51. Marletaz F, Martin E, Perez Y, Papillon D, Caubit X, Lowe CJ, Freeman B, Fasano L, Dossat C,Wincker P. 2006. Chaetognath phylogenomics: A protostome with deuterostome-like development. Curr Biol. 16: R577-R578.
52. Matus DQ, Copley RR, Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Eccleston H, Halanych KM, Martindale MQ, Telford MJ. 2006. Broad taxon and gene sampling indicate that chaetognaths are protostomes. Curr Biol. 16: R575-R576. (Pubitemid 44160767)
53. Meusemann K, von Reumont BM, Simon S, Roeding F, Strauss S, Kuck P, Ebersberger I,Walzl M, Pass G, Breuers S, et al. 2010. A phylogenomic approach to resolve the arthropod tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 27: 2451-2464.
54. Meyer M, Kircher M. 2010. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010:pdb.prot5448.
55. MilinkovitchMC, LeDuc RG, Adachi J, Farnir F, Georges M, Hasegawa M. 1996. Effects of character weighting and species sampling on phylogeny reconstruction: A case study based on DNA sequence data in cetaceans. Genetics 144:1817-1833. (Pubitemid 26427928)
56. Nesnidal M, Helmkampf M, Meyer A,Witek A, Bruchhaus I, Ebersberger I, Hankeln T, Lieb B, Struck TH, Hausdorf B. 2013. New phylogenomic data support the monophyly of Lophophorata and an Ectoproct-Phoronid clade and indicate that Polyzoa and Kryptrochozoa are caused by systematic bias. BMC Evol Biol. 13:253.
57. Nielsen C. 2012. Animal evolution-interrelationships of the living phyla. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
58. Northcutt RG. 2012. Evolution of centralized nervous systems: Two schools of evolutionary thought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109: 10626-10633.
59. Nosenko T, Schreiber F, Adamska M, Adamski M, Eitel M, Hammel J, Maldonado M, Muller WEG, Nickel M, Schierwater B, et al. 2013. Deep metazoan phylogeny: When different genes tell different stories. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 67:223-233.
60. Paps J, Baguna J, Riutort M 2009. Bilaterian phylogeny: A broad sampling of 13 nuclear genes provides a new Lophotrochozoa phylogeny and supports a paraphyletic basal Acoelomorpha.Mol Biol Evol. 26: 2397-2406.
61. Paps J, Baguña J, Riutort M. 2009. Lophotrochozoa internal phylogeny: New insights from an up-To-date analysis of nuclear ribosomal genes. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 276:1245-1254.
62. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. 2009. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? In: Batzoglou S, editor. RECOMB 2009, LNCS 5541. Berlin (Germany): Springer-Verlag. p. 184-200.
63. Perez Y, Muller CHG, Harzsch S. 2014. The Chaetognatha: An anarchistic taxon between Protostomia and Deuterostomia. In: Wagele JW, Bartolomaeus T, editors. Deep metazoan phylogeny: The backbone of the tree of life-new insights from analyses of molecules, morphology, and theory of data analysis. Berlin (Germany): De Gruyter. p. 49-77.
64. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, Littlewood DTJ, Manuel M, Worheide G, Baurain D. 2011. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: Why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 9:3.
65. Philippe H, Derelle R, Lopez P, Pick K, Borchiellini C, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J, Renard E, Houliston E, Queinnec E, et al. 2009. Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol. 19:706-712.
66. Rieger RM, Tyler S. 1995. Sister-group relationship of Gnathostomulida and Rotifera-Acanthocephala. Invertebr Biol. 114:186-188.
67. Riesgo A, Andrade SC, Sharma P, Novo M, Perez-Porro A, Vahtera V, Gonzalez V, Kawauchi G, Giribet G. 2012. Comparative description of ten transcriptomes of newly sequenced invertebrates and efficiency estimation of genomic sampling in non-model taxa. Front Zool. 9:33.
68. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Brinkmann H, Burger G, Roger AJ, Gray MW, Philippe H, Lang BF. 2007. Toward resolving the eukaryotic tree: The phylogenetic positions of jakobids and cercozoans. Curr Biol. 17:1420-1425. (Pubitemid 47259385)
69. Rota-Stabelli O, Telford MJ. 2008. A multi criterion approach for the selection of optimal outgroups in phylogeny: Recovering some support for Mandibulata over Myriochelata using mitogenomics. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 48:103-111.
70. Rothe B, Schmidt-Rhaesa A 2009. Architecture of the nervous system in two Dactylopodola species (Gastrotricha, Macrodasyida). Zoomorphology 128:227-246.
71. Roure B, Baurain D, Philippe H. 2013. Impact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 30:197-214.
72. Salichos L, Rokas A. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497:327-331.
73. Simmons MP. 2012.Misleading results of likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses in the presence of missing data. Cladistics 28:208-222.
74. Simmons MP. 2012. Radical instability and spurious branch support by likelihood when applied to matrices with non-random distributions of missing data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 62:472-484.
75. Simmons MP, Freudenstein JV. 2011. Spurious 99% bootstrap and jackknife support for unsupported clades. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 61: 177-191.
76. Slater G, Birney E. 2005. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics 6:31.
77. Smith SA, Dunn CW. 2008. Phyutility: A phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments and molecular data. Bioinformatics 24:715-716. (Pubitemid 351321218)
78. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690. (Pubitemid 44642609)
79. Struck TH. 2013. The impact of paralogy on phylogenomic studies-A case study on annelid relationships. PLoS One 8:e62892.
80. Struck TH. 2012. Phylogeny of Annelida. Handbook of Zoology Online [Internet]. Berlin (Germany): DeGruyter; [cited 20144 Apr 24]. Available from: Http://www.degruyter.com/view/Zoology//bp-029147-6-1.
81. Struck TH, Fisse F. 2008. Phylogenetic position of Nemertea derived from phylogenomic data. Mol Biol Evol. 25:728-736. (Pubitemid 351398328)
82. Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hosel C, Kube M, Lieb B, Meyer A, Tiedemann R, Purschke G, et al. 2011. Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471:95-98.
83. Susko E, Leigh J, DoolittleWF, Bapteste E. 2006. Visualizing and assessing phylogenetic congruence of core gene sets: A case study of the gamma-proteobacteria. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1019-1030. (Pubitemid 43726067)
84. Tomer R, Denes AS, Tessmar-Raible K, Arendt D. 2010. Profiling by image registration reveals common origin of annelid mushroom bodies and vertebrate pallium. Cell 142:800-809.
85. Turbeville JM. 1986. An ultrastructural analysis of coelomogenesis in the hoplonemertine Prosorhochmus americanus and the polychaete Magelona sp. J Morphol. 187:51-60.
86. Wey-Fabrizius AR, Herlyn H, Rieger B, Rosenkranz D, Witek A, Welch DBM, Ebersberger I, Hankeln T. 2014. Transcriptome data reveal syndermatan relationships and suggest the evolution of endoparasitism in Acanthocephala via an epizoic stage. PLoS One 9:e88618.
87. Witek A, Herlyn H, Ebersberger I, Mark Welch DB, Hankeln T. 2009. Support for the monophyletic origin of Gnathifera from phylogenomics. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 53:1037-1041.
88. Zhong M, Hansen B, Nesnidal MP, Golombek A, Halanych KM, Struck TH. 2011. Detecting the symplesiomorphy trap: A multigene phylogenetic analysis for terebelliform annelids. BMC Evol Biol. 11: 369..