Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1983-1987

  Pick, K S ^a   Philippe, H ^c   Schreiber, F ^b   Erpenbeck, D ^a   Jackson, D J ^b   Wrede, P ^d   Wiens, M ^d   Alie A ^e   Morgenstern, B ^b   Manuel, M ^e   Worheide G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c Universite de Montreal   (Canada)

^d Department of Applied Molecular Biology   (Germany)

^e SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Ctenophora; EST; long branch attraction; Metazoa; multigene analysis; Porifera; saturation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COELENTERATE; LONG BRANCH ATTRACTION; METAZOON; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MONOPHYLY; NONHUMAN; SISTER GROUP; SPONGE (PORIFERA); STEM TAXON; TAXON;

ANIMALS; CTENOPHORA; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PORIFERA;

ANIMALIA; CNIDARIA; CTENOPHORA (COELENTERATES); MATUS; METAZOA; PORIFERA;

EID: 77955497041     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq089     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ax P. 1996. Das System Der Metazoa. ein Lehrbuch Der Phylogenetischen Systematik. Stuttgart (Germany): Gustav Fischer Verlag.
2. Baurain D, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2007. Lack of resolution in the animal phylogeny: closely spaced cladogeneses or undetected systematic errors? Mol Biol Evol. 24:6-9
3. Carr M, Leadbeater BS, Hassan R, Nelson M, Baldauf SL. 2008. Molecular phylogeny of choanoflagellates, the sister group to Metazoa. Proc Natl Acad Sci\USA. 105:16641-16646
4. Dellaporta SL, Xu A, Sagasser S, Jakob W, Moreno MA, Buss LW, Schierwater B. 2006. Mitochondrial genome of Trichoplax adhaerens supports placozoa as the basal lower metazoan phylum. Proc Natl Acad Sci\USA. 103:8751-8756
5. Dohrmann M, Janussen D, Reitner J, Collins A, Wörheide G. 2008. Phylogeny and evolution of glass sponges (Porifera: Hexactinel-lida). Syst Biol. 57:388-405
6. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, et al. (18 co-authors). 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745-749
7. Erpenbeck D, Wörheide G. 2007. On the molecular phylogeny of sponges (Porifera). In: Zhang Z-Q, Shear WA, editors. Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa 1668. Auckland (New Zealand): Magnolia Press. p. 107-126
8. Grothe F. 1989. On the phylogeny of homoscleromorphs. Berl Geowiss Abh A. 106:155-164
9. Haeckel EH. 1866. Generelle Morphologie Der Organismen. Berlin (Germany): G. Reimer.
10. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, et al. (17 co-authors). 2009. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phy-logenomic methods. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 276:4261-4270
11. Hooper JNA, Van Soest RWM. 2002. Systema Porifera. Guide to the Supraspecific Classification of Sponges and Spongiomorphs (Porifera). New York: Plenum.
12. Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Philippe H. 2006. Phylogeno-mics: the beginning of incongruencë Trends Genet. 22:225-231
13. Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S. 2009. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25:2286.
14. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1095-1109
15. Lecointre G, Philippe H, Van Le HL, Le Guyader H. 1993. Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2:205-224
16. Philippe H, Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Lartillot N. 2005. Phylogenomics. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 36:541-562
17. Philippe H, Derelle R, Lopez P, et al. (20 co-authors). 2009. Phylogenomics restores traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol. 19:706-712
18. Philippe H, Laurent J. 1998. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Curr Opin Genet Dev. 8:616-623
19. Rokas A, Carroll SB. 2005. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phyloge-netic accuracy. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1337-1344
20. Rota-Stabelli O, Telford MJ. 2008. A multi criterion approach for the selection of optimal outgroups in phylogeny: recovering some support for Mandibulata over Myriochelata using mitogenom-ics. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 48:103-111
21. Schierwater B. 2005. My favorite animal, Trichoplax adhaerens. BioEssays 27:1294-1302
22. Schierwater B, Eitel M, Jakob W, Osigus H, Hadrys H, Dellaporta S, Kolokotronis S, Desalle R, Penny D. 2009. Concatenated analysis sheds light on early metazoan evolution and fuels a modern "urmetazoon" hypothesis. PLoS Biol. 7:e20.
23. Srivastava M, Begovic E, Chapman J, et al. (21 co-authors). 2008. The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans. Nature 454:955.
24. Van Soest RWM. 1984. Deficient Merlia normani from the Curaxcao reefs, with a discussion on the phylogenetic interpretation of sclerosponges. Bijdr Dierkd. 54:211-219