Corrigendum to: Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature (The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, (2015), 41, 1, (16-29), 10.3109/00952990.2014.966199);Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 16-29

  Miller, Peter G ^a   Curtis, Ashlee ^a   Sonderlund, Anders ^b   Day, Andrew ^a   Droste, Nic ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drink driving; DUI; Intervention; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL BLOOD LEVEL; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DATA BASE; DEATH; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; DRIVING ABILITY; DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OFFENDER; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EFFECT SIZE; EMBASE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INJURY; MEDLINE; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; OFFENDER; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RECIDIVISM; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; CAR DRIVING; CRIME; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; PEER REVIEW; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL CONTROL;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CRIME; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RISK-TAKING; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;

EID: 84917692994     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: 10979891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2018.1495015     Document Type: Erratum

References (58)

1. World Health Organisation (WHO). Alcohol and injuries: Emergency department studies in an international perspective. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health 2009:41-51.
2. Impinen A, Rahkonen O, Karjalainen K, Lintonen T, Lillsunde P, Ostamo A. Substance use as a predictor of driving under the influence (DUI) rearrests. A 15-year retrospective study. Traffic Inj Prevent 2009;10:220-226.
3. Marowitz LA. Predicting DUI recidivism: Blood alcohol concentration and driver record factors. Accident Analysis Prevent 1998; 30:545-554.
4. Yu J, Williford WR. Drunk-driving recidivism: Predicting factors from arrest context and case disposition. J Stud Alcohol 1995;56: 60-66.
5. DeYoung DJ. An evaluation of the implementation of ignition interlock in California. J Safety Res 2002;33:473-482.
6. Nochajski TH, Stasiewicz PR. Relapse to driving under the influence (DUI): A review. Clin Psychol Rev 2006;26:179-195.
7. Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R, McMillen R, Williams M. Final results from a meta-Analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction 1995;90:907-926.
8. Shults RA, Elder RW, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Alao MO, Carande-Kulis VG, Zaza S, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. Am J Prevent Med 2001; 21:66-88.
9. Shults RA, Elder RW, Nichols JL, Sleet DA, Comptom R, Chattopadhyay SK. Effectiveness of multicomponent programs with community mobilization for reducing alcohol-impaired driving. Am J Prevent Med 2009;37:360-371.
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting for systematic reviews and meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264-269.
11. Sherman LW, Gottfredson DC, MacKenzie DL, Eck J, Reuter P, Bushway SD. Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 1998.
12. Reeves B, Deeks J, Higgins J, Wells G. Chapter 13: Including nonrandomized studies. In: Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2008:390-432.
13. Finney JW, Moyer A. Meta-Analysis: Summarising findings on addiction intervention effects. In: Miller PG, Strang J, Miller PM, editors. Addiction research methods. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:319-336.
14. Moore KA, Harrison M, Young MS, Ochshorn E. A cognitive therapy treatment program for repeat DUI offenders. J Criminal Just 2008;36:539-545.
15. Wiliszowski CH, Fell JC, McKnight AS, Tippetts AS, Ciccel JD. An evaluation of Three intensive supervision programs for serious DWI offenders. Ann Adv Automot Med 2010;54:375-387.
16. Beirness DJ, Marques PR. Alcohol ignition interlock programs. Traffic Inj Prevent 2004;5:299-308.
17. Rauch W, Ahlin E, Zador P, Howard J, Duncan G. Effects of administrative ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses. J Experim Criminol 2011;7: 127-148.
18. Bjerre B, Thorsson U. Is an alcohol ignition interlock programme a useful tool for changing the alcohol and driving habits of drink-drivers? Accident Analysis Prevent 2008;40:267-273.
19. Roth R, Voas R, Marques P. Interlocks for first offenders: Effective? Traffic Inj Prevent 2007;8:346-352.
20. Bjerre B. Primary and secondary prevention of drink driving by the use of alcolock device and program: Swedish experiences. Accident Analysis Prevent 2005;37:1145-1152.
21. Raub RA, Lucke RE, Wark RI. Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices: Controlling the recidivist. Traffic Inj Prevent 2003;4: 28-34.
22. Voas RB, Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Beirness DJ. The Alberta Interlock Program: The evaluation of a province-wide program on DUI recidivism. Addiction 1999;94:1849-1859.
23. Weinrath M. The Ignition interlock program for drunk drivers: A multivariate test. Crime Delinquency 1997;43:42-59.
24. Beck KH, Rauch WJ, Baker EA, Williams AF. Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: A randomized trial in Maryland. Am J Public Health 1999; 89:1696-1700.
25. Beirness DJ, Marques PR, Voas RB, Tippetts AS. The impact of mandatory versus voluntary participation in the alberta ignition interlock program. Traffic Inj Prevent 2003;4:195-198.
26. Roth R, Voas R, Marques P. Mandating interlocks for fully revoked offenders: The New Mexico experience. Traffic Inj Prevent 2007;8: 20-25.
27. Bjerre B. An evaluation of the Swedish ignition interlock program. Traffic Inj Prevent 2003;4:17-23.
28. Wells-Parker E, Williams M. Enhancing the effectiveness of traditional interventions with drinking drivers by adding brief individual intervention components. J Stud Alcohol 2002;63: 655-664.
29. Robertson AA, Gardner S, Xu X, Costello H. The impact of remedial intervention on 3-year recidivism among first-Time DUI offenders in Mississippi. Accident Analysis Prevent 2009;41: 1080-1086.
30. Ekeh AP, Hamilton SB, D'Souza C, Everrett E, McCarthy MC. Long-Term evaluation of a trauma center-based juvenile driving intervention program. J Trauma 2011;71:223-226; discussion 226-227.
31. Mills KL, Hodge W, Johansson K, Conigrave KM. An outcome evaluation of the New South Wales Sober Driver Programme: A remedial programme for recidivist drink drivers. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008;27:65-74.
32. Rider R, Voas RB, Kelley-Baker T, Grosz M, Murphy B. Preventing alcohol-related convictions: The effect of a novel curriculum for first-Time offenders on DUI recidivism. Traffic Inj Prevent 2007;8:147-152.
33. Williams DJ, Simmons P, Thomas A. Predicting DUI recidivism following an alcohol safety action program. J Offender Rehabil 2000;32:129-145.
34. Deyoung DJ. An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment, driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California. Addiction 1997;92:989-997.
35. C'De Baca J, Lapham SC, Paine S, Skipper BJ. Victim impact panels: Who is sentenced to attend? Does attendance affect recidivism of first-Time DWI offenders? Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000;24:1420-1426.
36. Crew BK, Johnson SE. Do victim impact programs reduce recidivism for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated? Findings from an outcomes evaluation. Crim Just Stud 2011;24: 153-163.
37. Wheeler DR, Rogers EM, Tonigan JS, Woodall WG. Effectiveness of customized Victim Impact Panels on first-Time DWI offender inmates. Accident Analysis Prevent 2004;36:29-35.
38. Rojek DG, Coverdill JE, Fors SW. The effect of victim impact panels on DUI rearrest rates: A five-year follow-up. Criminology 2003;41:1319-1340.
39. Shinar D, Comptom RP. Victim Impact Panels: Their impact on DWI recidivism. Alcohol, Drugs Driving 1995;11:73-87.
40. Sprang G. Victim impact panels. J Soc Serv Res 1997;22:73-84.
41. Fors SW, Rojek DG. The effect of victim impact panels on DUI/DWI rearrest rates: A twelve-month follow-up. J Stud Alcohol 1999;60:514-520.
42. C'De Baca J, Lapham SC, Liang HC, Skipper BJ. Victim impact panels: Do they impact drunk drivers? A follow-up of female and male, first-Time and repeat offenders. J Stud Alcohol 2001;62: 615-620.
43. Warchol GL. Intensive supervision probation: An impact evaluation. Justice Professional 2000;13:219-232.
44. Lapham SC, Kapitula LR, C'de Baca J, McMillan GP. Impaireddriving recidivism among repeat offenders following an intensive court-based intervention. Accident Analysis Prevent 2006;38: 162-169.
45. Lapham SC, C'De Baca J, Lapidus J, McMillan GP. Randomized sanctions to reduce re-offense among repeat impaired-driving offenders. Addiction 2007;102:1618-1625.
46. MacDonald JM, Morral AR, Raymond B, Eibner C. The efficacy of the Rio Hondo DUI court: A 2-year field experiment. Evaluat Rev 2007;31:4-23.
47. Bouffard JA, Richardson KA, Franklin T. Drug courts for DWI offenders? The effectiveness of two hybrid drug courts on DWI offenders. J Crim Justice 2010;38:25-33.
48. Fell JC, Tippetts AS, Ciccel JD. An evaluation of three drivingunder-The-influence courts in Georgia. Ann Adv Automot Med 2011;55:301-312.
49. Ronan SM, Collins PA, Rosky JW. The effectiveness of Idaho DUI and misdemeanor/DUI courts: Outcome evaluation. J Offender Rehabil 2009;48:154-165.
50. Courtright KE, Berg BL, Mutchnick RJ. Effects of house arrest with electronic monitoring on DUI offenders. J Offender Rehabil 1997;24:35-51.
51. Yu J. Punishment celerity and severity: Testing a specific deterrence model on drunk driving recidivism. J Crim Justice 1994;22: 355-366.
52. Ouimet MC, Dongier M, Di Leo I, Legault L, Tremblay J, Chanut F, Brown TG. A randomized controlled trial of brief motivational interviewing in impaired driving recidivists: A 5-year follow-up of traffic offenses and crashes. Alcoholism 2013;37:1979-1985.
53. Utter GH, Young JB, Theard LA, Cropp DM, Mhoar CJ, Eisenberg D, Schermer CR, Owens LJ. The effect of problematic drinking behaviour of a brief motivational interview shortly after a first arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol: A randomized trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;76:661-671.
54. Schermer CR, Moyers TB, Miller WR, Bloomfield LA. Trauma center brief interventions for alcohol disorders decrease subsequent driving under the influence arrests. J Trauma 2006;60: 29-34.
55. Lucker GW, Osti JR. Reduced recidivism among first-Time DWI offenders as a correlate of pre-Trial intervention. J Offender Rehabil 1997;24:1-17.
56. Weinrath M, Gartrell J. Specific deterrence and sentence length: The case of drunk drivers. J Contemp Crim Just 2001;17:105-122.
57. Kilmer B, Nicosia N, Heaton P, Midgette G. Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: Insights from South Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Project. Am J Public Health 2013;103:e37-e43.
58. Delaney HD, Kunitz SJ, Hongwei Z, Woodall WG, Westerberg V, Rogers E, Wheeler DR. Variations in jail sentences and the probability of re-Arrest for driving while intoxicated. Traffic Inj Prevent 2005;6:105-109.