The Alberta interlock program: The evaluation of a province-wide program on DUI recidivism

Addiction

Volumn 94, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 1849-1859

  Voas, Robert B ^a   Marques, Paul R ^a   Tippetts, A Scott ^a   Beirness, Douglas J ^b  

^a PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^b Traffic Injury Research Foundation   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BREATH ANALYSIS; CANADA; CAR; DRUNKEN DRIVING; OFFENDER; RECIDIVISM;

EID: 0032734229     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9412184910.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BECK, K. H., RAUCH, W. J. & BAKER, E. A. (1997) The effects of alcohol ignition interlock license restrictions on multiple alcohol offenders: a randomized trial in Maryland, in: MERCIER-GUYON, C. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, vol. 1, pp. 177-192 (Annecy, France, CERMT, Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches on Mèdecine du Trafic).
2. COBEN, J. H. & LARKIN, G. L. (1999) Effectiveness of ignition interlock devices in reducing drunk driving recidivism, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16, 81-87.
3. JOHNSON, W, W. & CINTRON, M. (1998) Implementing breath alcohol ignition interlock device legislation: a survey of Texas probation officers, Journal of Offender Monitoring, 11, 5-7.
4. JONES, B. (1993) The effectiveness of Oregon's ignition interlock program, in: UTZELMANN, H.-D., BERGHAUS, G. & KROJ, J. (Eds) Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety - T-92: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, Cologne, 28 September-2 October 1992, vol. 3, pp. 1460-1465 (Köln, Germany, Verlage TÜV Rheinland GmbH).
5. KAPLAN, E. L. & MEIER, P. (1958) Nonparametric estímation from incomplete observations, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457-481.
6. LEE, E. T. (1992) Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis (New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons).
7. MARQUES, P. R., VOAS, R. B., TIPPETTS, A, S. & BEIRNESS, D. J. (1999) Behavioral monitoring of DUI offenders with the Alcohol Ignition Interlock Recorder, Addiction, 94, 1861-1870.
8. POPKIN, C. L., STEWART, J. R., BECKMEYER, J. & MARTELL, C. (1993) An evaluation of the effectiveness of interlock systems in preventing DWI recidivism among second-time DWI offenders, in: UTZELMANN, H.-D., BERGHAUS, G. & KROJ, J. (Eds) Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety - T-92: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, Cologne, 28 September-2 October 1992, vol. 3, pp, 1466-1470 (Köln, Germany, Verlage TÜV Rheinland GmbH).
9. ROSS, H. & GONZALES, P. (1988) The effect of license revocation on drunk-driving offenders, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 20, 379-391.
10. SIMPSON, H. M., MAYHEW, D. R. & BEIRNESS, D. J. (1996) Dealing With Hard Core Drinking Drivers (Ottawa, Canada) Traffic Injury Research Foundation).
11. TASHIMA, H. N. & HELANDER, C. J. (1999) 1999 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System (CAL-DMV-RSS-99-179) (Sacramento, CA, California Department of Motor Vehicles, Research and Development Section).
12. TIPPETTS, A. S. & VOAS, R. B. (1998) The effectiveness of the West Virginia interlock program, Journal of Traffic Medicine, 26, 19-24.
13. VOAS, R. B., TIPPETTS, A. S. & TAYLOR, E. P. (1999) Impact of Ohio administrative license suspension, Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control, in press.
14. WEINRATH, M. (1997) The ignition interlock program for drunk drivers: a multivariate test. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 42-59.