An evaluation of three driving-under-the-influence courts in Georgia

Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine

Volumn 55, Issue , 2011, Pages 301-312

  Fell, James C ^a   Tippetts, A Scott ^a   Ciccel, J DeCarlo ^b  

^a PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^b NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG TESTING; GEORGIA; IMPACT EVALUATION;

MEDICINE;

CAR DRIVING; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; GEORGIA; HUMAN; OFFENDER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CRIMINALS; GEORGIA; HUMANS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84055190620     PISSN: 19432461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Administrative Office of the Courts of Georgia. (2006). Effective DUI Court Adjudication: DUI Court Pilot Program Best Practices Manual. NHTSA Grant Project No. 403B-00-03-201.
2. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J Royal Stat Soc Series 34: 187-220; 1972.
3. Cox DR, Oakes DO. Analysis of survival data. London: Chapman and Hall; 1984.
4. Fuller B, Carey SM, Kissick K. Michigan DUI Courts Outcome Evaluation (Final Report). Portland, OR: NPC Research; October, 2007.
5. Guerin P, Pitts WJ. Evaluation of the Bernalillo County Metropolitan DWI/Drug Court: Final report. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico, Center for Applied Research and Analysis; 2002.
6. Huddleston CW, Marlowe DB, Casebolt R. Painting the Current Picture: A National Report Card on Drug Courts and Other Problem-Solving Court Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Drug Court Institute, Bureau of Justice Assistance; 2008.
7. Jones RK, Lacey JH. State of knowledge of alcohol impaired driving: Research on repeat DWI offenders (DOT HS 809 027). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2000.
8. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assn 53: 457-481; 1958.
9. MacDonald JM, Morral AR, Raymond B, et al. The efficacy of the Rio Hondo DUI court. Eval Rev 31(1): 4-23; 2007.
10. Michigan Office of Public Safety. 1998 Drunk Driving Audit. Lansing, MI: Michigan Office of Public Safety; 1998.
11. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. A Guide to Sentencing DWI Offenders. 2nd Edition 2005 (DOT HS 810 555). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation; January, 2006.
12. Reilly DA, Pierre-Lawson A. Ensuring Sustainability for Drug Courts: An Overview of Funding Strategies (Monograph Series 8). Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Instittue; April, 2008.
13. Rempel M, Fox-Kralstein D, Cissner A, et al. The New York State adult drug court evaluation: Policies, participants and impacts. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation; 2003.
14. Voas RB, Fisher DA. Court procedures for handling intoxicated drivers. Alcohol Research and Health World 25(1): 32-42; 2001.