An evaluation of three intensive supervision programs for serious DWI offenders

Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine - 54th Annual Scientific Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 375-387

  Wiliszowski, Connie H ^a   Fell, James C ^b   Scott McKnight, A ^b   Scott Tippetts, A ^b   DeCarlo Ciccel, J ^c  

^a Bedford Research   (United States)

^b PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^c NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARISON GROUP; COVARIATES; DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE; DWI OFFENDERS; ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS; LONG TERM; MINNESOTA; NEW YORK; PROGRAM COMPONENTS; SHORT TERM;

MEDICINE;

ALCOHOL INTOXICATION; CAR DRIVING; DRUNKEN DRIVING; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MINNESOTA; OFFENDER; OREGON;

ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CRIMINALS; DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE; HUMANS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MINNESOTA; OREGON;

EID: 78650859991     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Dang JN. Statistical Analysis of Alcohol-Related Driving Trends. 1982-2005 (DOT HS 810 942). Washington, DC: National Highway Safety Administration; 2008.
2. Decker MD, Graitcer PL, Schaffner W. Reduction in motor vehicle fatalities associated with an increase in the minimum drinking age. JAMA 260(24): 3604-3610; 1988.
3. Elder RW, Shults RA, Sleet DA, et al. Effectiveness of sobriety checkpoints for reducing alcoholinvolved crashes. Traffic Inj Prev 3: 266-274; 2002.
4. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform Crime Report: Crime in the United States. 2007. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation; 2007.
5. Fell JC, Fisher DA, Voas RB, et al. The relationship of underage drinking laws to reductions in drinking drivers in fatal crashes in the United States. Accid Anal Prev 40: 1430-1440; 2008.
6. Fell JC, Lacey JH, Voas RB. Sobriety checkpoints: Evidence of effectiveness is strong, but use is limited. Traffic Inj Prev 5(3): 220-227; 2004.
7. Fell JC, Voas RB. Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD): The first 25 years. Traffic Inj Prev 7(3): 195-212; 2006.
8. Harding WM. User's guide to new approaches and sanctions for multiple DWI offenders (DOT HS 807 571). Springfield, VA: National Highway Safety Administration/National Technical Information Service; 1989.
9. Hingson R, Heeren T, Winter M. Lower legal blood alcohol limits for young drivers. Public Health Rep 109(6): 739-744; 1994.
10. Hingson R, Heeren T, Winter M. Effects of recent 0.08% legal blood alcohol limits on fatal crash involvement. Inj Prev 6(2): 109-114; 2000.
11. Hingson R, Merrigan D, Heeren T. Effects of Massachusetts raising its legal drinking age from 18 to 20 on deaths from teenage homicide, suicide, and nontraffic accidents. Pediatr Clin North Am 32(1): 221-232; 1985.
12. Jones RK, Wiliszowski CH, Lacey JH. Evaluation of alternative programs for repeat DWI offenders (DOT HS 808 493). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Program Development and Evaluation; 1996.
13. Jones RL, Lacey JH. Evaluation of an individualized sanctioning program for DWI offenders (DOT HS 808 842). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; December, 1998.
14. Klein TM. Changes in alcohol-involved fatal crashes associated with tougher state alcohol legislation (DOT HS 807 511). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1989.
15. Lacey JH, Jones RK, Smith RG. An evaluation of Checkpoint Tennessee: Tennessee's statewide sobriety checkpoint program (Final Report DOT HS 808 841). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; January, 1999.
16. Loudenburg R. South Dakota 24/7 Sobriety Program: Comparison of 24/7 Rates. Salem, SD: Mountain Plains Evaluation, LLC; 2009, unpublished.
17. McCartt AT, Northrup VS. Enhanced sanctions for higher BACs: Evaluation of Minnesota's High BAC Law (DOT HS 809 677). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; May, 2004.
18. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Available online at (Last accessed on February, 2009); 2007.
19. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration/National Institute on Alcohol
20. Abuse and Alcoholism. A Guide to Sentencing DWI Offenders. 2nd Edition 2005 (DOT HS 810 555). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation; January, 2006.
21. Peek-Asa C. The effect of random alcohol screening in reducing motor vehicle crash injuries. Am J Prev Med 16(1S): 57-67; 1999.
22. Popkin CL, Kannenberg CH, Lacey JH, et al. Assessment of classification instruments designed to detect alcohol abuse DOT HS 807 475. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; December, 1988.
23. Ross HL. Confronting drunk driving: Social policy for saving lives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1992.
24. Royal D. National Survey of Drinking and Driving Attitudes and Behavior: 2001. Volume I: Summary Report (DOT HS 809 549). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; 2003.
25. Shults RA, Elder RW, Sleet DA, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcoholimpaired driving. Am J Prev Med 21 (4 Suppl): 6688; 2001.
26. Tauber J, Huddleston CW. DUI/drug courts: Defining a national strategy. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute; 1999.
27. Toomey TL, Rosenfeld C, Wagenaar AC. The minimum legal drinking age: History, effectiveness, and ongoing debate. Alcohol Health Res World 20(4) 213-218: 1996.
28. Transportation Research Board. Strategies for dealing with the persistent drinking driver. In: Transportation Research Circular 437. Washington, DC: National Research Council; 1995.
29. Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Fell JC. The relationship of alcohol safety laws to drinking drivers in fatal crashes. Accid Anal Prev 32(4): 483-492; 2000.
30. Wagenaar AC, Toomey TL. Effects of minimum drinking age laws: Review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000. J Stud Alcohol (Supplement No. 14): 206-225; 2002.
31. Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R, McMillen R, et al. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction 90(7): 907-926; 1995.
32. Wells-Parker E, Landrum JW, Topping JS. Matching the DWI offender to an effective intervention strategy: An emerging research agenda. In: Wilson RJ, Mann RE, editors. Drinking and driving: Advances in research and prevention. New York: The Guilford Press; 1990. p. 267-289.
33. Wiliszowski C, Murphy P, Jones R, et al. Determine reasons for repeat drinking and driving (DOT HS 808 401)Final Report. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); May, 1996.
34. Zador PK, Lund AK, Field M, et al. Alcoholimpaired driving laws and fatal crash involvement. Washington, DC: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 1988.