Effects of house arrest with electronic monitoring on DUI offenders

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

Volumn 24, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 35-51

  Courtright, Kevin E ^a   Berg, Bruce L ^b   Mutchnick, Robert J ^c  

^a Hubert College   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008814991     PISSN: 10509674     EISSN: 15408558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J076v24n03_03     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ball, R.A., & Lilly, J.R. (1986). The potential use of home incarceration for drunken drivers. Crime & Delinquency, 32, (2), 224-247.
2. Baumer, T.L., Maxfield, M.G., & Mendelsohn, R.I. (1993). A comparative analysis of three electronically monitored home detention programs. Justice Quarterly, ¡0,(1), 121-142.
3. Baumer, T.L., & Mendelsohn, R.I. (1990). Final report-The electronic monitoring of non-violent convicted felons: An experiment in home detention (86-IJ-CX-0041). School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
4. Beck, A.J., & Shipley, B.E. (1989). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ-116261.
5. Byme, J.M., Lurigio, A.J., & Baird, S.C. (1989). The effectiveness of the new intensive supervision programs. Research in Corrections, 2, (2), Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Corrections.
6. Byme, J.M., Lurigio, A.J., & Petersilia, J. (eds.) (1992). Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions. California: Sage.
7. Cole, G.F. (1992). The American system of criminal justice (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8. Cohen, R.L. (1992). Drunk driving: 1989 survey of inmates of local jails. Bureau of Justice Statistics, United States Department of Justice, NCJ-134728.
9. County Intermediate Punishment Act (1990). Act No. 1990-1993. S.B. No. 718. General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
10. Jacobs, J.B. (1989). Drunk driving: An American dilemma. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Kuhar, M.J. (1991). Western county intermediate punishment plan. Western County Probation Department, Western, PA.
12. Lilly, J.R., Ball, R.A., Curry, G.D., & McMullen, J. (1993). Electronic monitoring of the drunk driver; A seven-year study of the home confinement alternative. Crime dc Delinquency, 39, (4), 462-484.
13. Lilly, J.R., Ball, R.A., Curry, G.D., & Smith, R.C. (1992). The Pride, Inc., program: An evaluation of $ years of electronic monitoring. Federal Probation (December), 42-47.
14. Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Norusis, M.J. (1993). SPSS for windows: Base system user's guide-Release 6.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
16. Renzema, M. (1992). Home confinement programs: Development, implementation, and impact. In J.M. Byme, A.J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 41-53). California: Sage.
17. Rockwell, D. (1993). Intermediate punishment report-1992. Erie, PA: Erie County Adult Probation/Parole Department.
18. Smith, L.G. (1990). Recidivism, community control, and imprisonment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida.
19. Vehicles Law of Pennsylvania (1994). Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes and Related Statutes. Gould Publications, Inc.