The effect of victim impact panels on DUI/DWI rearrest rates: A twelve- month follow-up

Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 514-520

  Fors, Stuart W ^a   Rojek, Dean G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ALCOHOL INTOXICATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CRIME; DATA ANALYSIS; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; DRIVING ABILITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; OFFENDER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032992614     PISSN: 0096882X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1999.60.514     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BACHTEL, D. AND BOATRIGHT, S. (Eds.). Georgia County Guide, 15th Edition, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service, 1996, p. 18.
2. BADOVINAC, K. The effects of victim impact panels on attitudes and intentions regarding impaired driving. J. Alcohol Drug Educ. 39 (3): 113-118, 1994.
3. BRAITHWAITE, J. Crime, Shame and Reintegration, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989.
4. BRAITHWAITE, J. Shame and modernity. Brit. J. Criminol. 33: 1-18, 1993.
5. FORS, S. AND ROJEK, D. DUI offenders' reactions to a required victim impact panel intervention, Athens, GA: University of Georgia, 1997, unpublished report.
6. GORDIS, E. Drinking and Driving: A Commentary. Alcohol Alert No. 31, PH 362, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, January 1996.
7. LUND, A.K. AND WOLFE, A.C. Changes in the incidence of alcohol-impaired driving in the United States, 1973-1986. J. Stud. Alcohol 52: 293-301, 1991.
8. NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION. Traffic Safety Facts 1994, Report No. DOT H5-808-292, Washington: Department of Transportation, 1995a.
9. NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION. Victims Impact Panel (VIP) of Oklahoma. In: Traffic Safety Digest: A Compendium of Innovative State and Community Traffic Safety Projects, Winter 1995b.
10. O'LAUGHLIN, L.H. Drunk Driving: The Effects of the Clackamas County DUI Victim Impact Panel on Recidivism Rates, Oregon City, OR: Clackamas County Chapter, MADD, 1990.
11. RAO, N., WOODALL, W., ROGERS, E., KANG, N., POLACSEK, M. AND WAY, P. Effects of Mothers Against Drunk Driving's (MADD's) victim impact panels on first-time DWI offenders: Some initial results. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM, May 1995.
12. SHEPPARD, M.A. AND STOVEKEN, C.A. Convicted impaired drivers' knowledge about alcohol: Relevance for program development. J. Alcohol Drug Educ. 38 (2): 113-122, 1993.
13. SHINAR, D. AND COMPTON, R.P. Victim Impact Panels: Their impact on DWI recidivism. Alcohol Drugs Driv. 11: 73-87, 1995.
14. VINGILIS, E., LARKIN, E., STODUTO, G., PARKINSON-HEYES, A. AND MCLELLAN, B. Psychosocial sequelae of motor vehicle collisions: A follow-up study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 28: 637-645, 1996.
15. VOAS, R.B., WELLS, J., LESTINA, D., WILLIAMS, A. AND GREENE, M. Drinking and driving in the United States: The 1996 National Roadside Survey. Accid. Anal. Prev. 30: 267-275, 1998.
16. WELLS-PARKER, E., BANGERT-DROWNS, R., MCMILLEN, R. AND WILLIAMS, M. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction 90: 907-926, 1995.