Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: A randomized trial in Maryland

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 1696-1700

  Beck, Kenneth H ^a,b,c   Rauch, William J ^a   Baker, Elizabeth A ^b   Williams, Allan F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b WESTAT   (United States)

^c Insurance Institute for Highway Safety ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DRIVER LICENCE; DRUNKEN DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OFFENDER; TRAFFIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032729681     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.89.11.1696     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Traffic Safety Facts 1997. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, National High-way Traffic Safety Administration; 1998.
2. Ross HL, Gonzales P. Effects of license revocation on drunk-driving offenders. Accid Anal Prev. 1988;20:379-391.
3. Wiliszowski C, Murphy P, Jones R, Lacey J. Determine Reasons for Repeat Drinking and Driving. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1996. NTIS DOTHS 808-401.
4. Frank JF. Ignition interlock devices: an overview and the future. In: Mercier-Guyon C, ed. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety. Annecy, France: Centre d'Etudes et de Récherches en Médecine du Trafic; 1997:171-176.
5. Linnell RH, Mook SJ. Ignition Interlock Devices: An Assessment of Their Application to Reduce DUI. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 1991.
6. Evaluation of the California Ignition Interlock Pilot Program for DUI Offenders. Final Report. Sacramento, Calif: EMT Group Inc; 1990.
7. Morse BJ, Elliot DS. Hamilton County Drinking and Driving Study: 30 Month Report. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado; February 1990.
8. Morse BJ, Elliot DS. Effects of ignition interlock devices on DUI recidivism: findings from a longitudinal study in Hamilton County, Ohio. Crime Delinquency. 1992;3 8:131-157.
9. Popkin CL, Stewart JR, Martell C, Birckmayer JD. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Interlock in Preventing Recidivism in a Population of Multiple Dm Offenders. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, 1992. Final Report for the Governor's Highway Safety Program.
10. Weinrath M. The ignition interlock program for drunk drivers: a multivariate test. Crime Delinquency. 1997;43:42-59.
11. Tippetts AS, Voas RB. The effectiveness of the West Virginia interlock program on second drunk driving offenders. In: Mercier-Guyon C, ed. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety. Annecy, France: Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches en Médecine du Trafic; 1997:185-192.
12. Beirness DJ, Marques PM, Voas RB, Tippetts AS. Evaluation of the Alberta ignition interlock program: preliminary results. In: MercierGuyon C, ed. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety. Annecy, France: Centre d'Etudes et de Récherches en Médecine du Trafic; 1997: 193-199.
13. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. JAm StatAssoc. 1958;53:457-481.
14. Lee ET. Statistical Methods for Survival Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ine; 1992.
15. Beitel GA, Sharp MC, Glauz WD. Probability of arrest while driving under the influence of alcohol. JStudAlcohol. 1975;36:109-116.
16. Hingson R. Environmental strategies to reduce chronic driving while intoxicated. In: Strategies for Dealing With the Persistent Drinking Driver. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council; 1995. Transportation Research Circular 437:25-32.