Effects of administrative ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 127-148

  Rauch, William J ^a   Ahlin, Eileen M ^a   Zador, Paul L ^a   Howard, Jan M ^a   Duncan, Doug ^a  

^a WESTAT   (United States)

Author keywords

Administrative program; Driving while intoxicated Driving under the influence; Ignition interlock; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957955409     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-010-9118-0     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anda, R. F., Remington, P. L., & Williamson, D. F. (1986). A sobering perspective on a lower blood alcohol limit (letter to the editor). Journal of the American Medical Association, 256, 3213.
2. Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3. Beck, K. H., Rauch, W. J., Baker, E. A., & Williams, A. F. (1999). Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: a randomized trial in Maryland. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1696-1700.
4. Beirness, D. J., Clayton, A., & Vanlaar, W. (2008). An investigation of the usefulness, the acceptability and impact on lifestyle of alcohol ignition interlocks in drink-driving offenders. London: Department for Transport.
5. Beitel, G. A., Sharp, M. C., & Glauz, W. D. (1975). Probability of arrest while driving under the influence of alcohol. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, 109-116.
6. Bjerre, B. (2003). An evaluation of the Swedish ignition interlock program. Traffic Injury Prevention, 4, 98-104.
7. Bjerre, B. (2005). Primary and secondary prevention of drink driving by the use of Alcolock device and program: Swedish experiences. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 1145-1152.
8. Bjerre, B., Marques, P., Selén, J., & Thorsson, U. (2007a). A Swedish alcohol ignition interlock programme for drink-drivers: effects on hospital care utilization and sick leave. Addiction, 102, 560-570.
9. Bjerre, B., Kostela, J., & Selén, J. (2007b). Positive health-care effects of an alcohol ignition interlock programme among driving while impaired (DWI) offenders. Addiction, 102, 1771-1781.
10. Bjerre, B., & Thorsson, U. (2008). Is an alcohol ignition interlock programme a useful tool for changing the alcohol and driving habits of drink-drivers? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 267-273.
11. Blincoe, L., Seay, A., Zaloshnja, E., Miller, T., Romano, E., Luchter, S., et al. (2002). The economic impact of motor vehicle crashes, 2000 (DOT HS 809 446). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
12. Borkenstein, R. F. (1974). In S. Israelstam and S. Lambert (Eds.), Problems of enforcement, adjudication, and sanctioning. Proceedings of the 6th International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
13. Bouffard, L. A., Bergeron, L. E., & Bouffard, J. A. (2007). Investigating the impact of extended bar closing times on police stops for DUI. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 537-545.
14. Caudill, B. D., Kantor, G. K., & Ungerleider, S. (1990). Driving while intoxicated: increased deterrence or alternative transportation for the drunk driver. Journal of Substance Abuse, 2, 51-67.
15. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
16. Compton, R. P., & Hedlund, J. (2007). Reducing impaired-driving recidivism using advanced vehicle-based alcohol detection systems. A report to Congress. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
17. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 187-202.
18. Cox, D. R., & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data. London: Chapman Hall.
19. Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal Justice 2000, Volume 3: Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
20. Dawson, D. A. (1999). Alternative definitions of high risk for impaired driving: the overlap of high volume, frequent heavy drinking and alcohol dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 54, 219-228.
21. DeYoung, D. J. (2002). An evaluation of the implementation of ignition interlock in California. Journal of Safety Research, 33, 473-482.
22. DeYoung, D. J., Tashima, H. N., & Masten, S. V. (2004). An evaluation of the effectiveness of ignition interlock in California: Report to the Legislature of the State of California (CAL-DMV-RSS-04-210/AL0357). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
23. Felson, M. (2002). Crime and everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Ferguson, S. A., Wells, J. K., & Lund, A. K. (1995). The role of passive alcohol sensors in detecting alcohol-impaired drivers at sobriety checkpoints. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 11, 23-30.
25. Guide to Community Preventive Services (2007). Reducing alcohol-impaired driving: ignition interlocks. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from www. thecommunityguide. org/mvoi/AID/ignitioninterlocks. html.
26. Gruenwald, P. J., Mitchell, P. R., & Treno, A. J. (1996). Drinking and driving: drinking patterns and drinking problems. Addiction, 91, 1637-1649.
27. Hingson, R. W. (1995). Environmental strategies to reduce chronic driving while intoxicated. In National Research Council (U. S.) Transportation Research Board (Ed.), Strategies for dealing with the persistent drinking driver, Monograph No. HS-041 995 (pp. 25-32). Washington, DC: Transportation Review Board.
28. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (2009). DUI/DWI laws. Retrieved April 11, 2009, from http://www. iihs. org/laws/dui. aspx.
29. Jones, R. K., & Lacey, J. H. (2000). State of knowledge of alcohol-impaired driving: Research on repeat DWI offenders (DOT HS 809 027). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
30. Jones, I. S., & Lund, A. K. (1986). Detection of alcohol-impaired drivers using a passive alcohol sensor. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14, 153-160.
31. Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457-481.
32. Lachin, J. M. (2000). Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Controlled Clinical Trials, 21, 167-189.
33. Lucke, R., Wark, R., & Raub, R. (2001). Illinois secretary of state breath alcohol ignition interlock device (BAIID) program evaluation and final report. Volume I: program evaluation. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Center for Public Safety.
34. Madigan, N. (2007). Audit finds serious MVA flaws: Monitoring of drunken drivers, license security faulted by state. Baltimore Sun, A1.
35. Marques, P. R., & Voas, R. B. (2010). Key features for ignition interlock programs (DOT HS 811 262). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
36. McCartt, A. T., Wells, J. K., & Teoh, E. R. (2009). Attitudes towards in-vehicle advanced alcohol detection technology. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
37. McKnight, A. J. (1993). Server intervention: accomplishments and needs. Alcohol Health and Research World, 17, 76-83.
38. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). (2009). National center for statistics and analysis: Traffic safety facts (DOT HS 811 172). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
39. Office of Legislative Audits. (2007). Audit report: Department of transportation, motor vehicle administration. Annapolis, MD: Office of Legislative Audits, Department of Legislative Services, Maryland General Assembly.
40. Perrine, M. W. (1990). Who are the drinking drivers? The spectrum of drinking drivers revisited. Alcohol Health and Research World, 14, 26-35.
41. Popkin, C. L., Stewart, J. R., Martell, C., & Birckmayer, J. D. (1992). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the interlock in preventing recidivism in a population of multiple DWI offenders. Final report for the Governor's Highway Safety Program. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center.
42. Raub, R. A., Lucke, R. E., & Wark, R. I. (2001). Illinois secretary of state breath alcohol ignition interlock device (BAIID) program evaluation and final report Volume II: Pilot implementation evaluation. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Center for Public Safety.
43. Raub, R. A., Lucke, R. E., & Wark, R. I. (2003). Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices: controlling the recidivist. Traffic Injury Prevention, 4, 199-205.
44. Rauch, W. J., Zador, P. L., Ahlin, E. M., & Duncan, G. D. (2003). Database enhancement and analysis: Alcohol-impaired driving in Maryland. Average time lag between the occurrence of an alcohol-related moving violation and a final adjudication status: An analysis of three extracts from the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration's Driver Record Database. (Prepared under contract to the State of Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration). Rockville, MD.
45. Rauch, W. J., Ahlin, E. M., Zador, P. L., & Duncan, G. D.(2005). DWI offenders appearing in Maryland district courts: Offender demographics and case characteristics. 28th Annual Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism, Santa Barbara, California. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 934A.
46. Roth, R. (2008). New Mexico interlock program, 2008. Retrieved April 22, 2009, from http://drivesoberillinois. org/pdf/Richard%20Roth. pdf.
47. Roth, R., Voas, R., & Marques, P. (2007a). Mandating interlocks for fully revoked offenders: the New Mexico experience. Traffic Injury Prevention, 8, 20-25.
48. Roth, R., Voas, R., & Marques, P. (2007b). Interlocks for first offenders: effective? Traffic Injury Prevention, 8, 346-352.
49. ©user's guide, version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
50. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Random House.
51. Tarde, G. (1903 [1963]). The laws of imitation. Magnolia, MA: Peter Smith Publishing.
52. Tippetts, A. S., & Voas, R. B. (1998). The effectiveness of the West Virginia Interlock program. Journal of Traffic Medicine, 26, 19-24.
53. Voas, R. B. (2009). Personal communication.
54. Voas, R. B. (2001). Have the courts and the motor vehicle departments adequate power to control the hard-core drunk driver? Addiction, 96, 1701-1707.
55. Voas, R. B., Blackman, K. O., Tippetts, A. S., & Marques, P. R. (2002). Evaluation of a program to motivate impaired driving offenders to install ignition interlocks. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34, 449-455.
56. Voas, R. B., & Hause, J. M. (1987). Deterring the drinking driver: the Stockton experience. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 19, 81-90.
57. Voas, R. B., Marques, P. R., Tippetts, A. S., & Beirness, D. J. (1999). The Alberta interlock program: the evaluation of a province-wide program on DUI recidivism. Addiction, 94, 1849-1859.
58. Wiliszowski, C., Murphy, P., Jones, R., & Lacey, J. (1996). Determine reasons for repeat drinking and driving (DOT HS 808 401). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
59. Willis, C., Lybrand, S., & Bellamy, N. (2004). Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drunk driving recidivism. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Issue, 3. Art. No.: CD004168. pub2. doi: 10. 1002/14651858. CD004168. pub2.
60. Yi, H., Chen, C. M., & Williams, G. D. (2006). Surveillance report #76: Trends in alcohol-related fatal traffic crashes, United States, 1982-2004. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Division of Epidemiology and Prevention Research.
61. Zador, P. L., Krawchuk, S. A., & Voas, R. B. (2000). Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: an update using 1996 data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 6, 387-395.