Randomized sanctions to reduce re-offense among repeat impaired-driving offenders

Addiction

Volumn 102, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1618-1625

  Lapham, Sandra C ^a,c   C'de Baca, Janet ^a   Lapidus, Jodi ^b   McMillan, Garnett P ^a  

^a Behavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Center of PIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

DUI; Electronic monitoring; Impaired driving; Mandatory auto sale; Recidivism

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL ABUSE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; COURT; DRUNKEN DRIVING; ELECTRONICS; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MULTICHANNEL RECORDER; OFFENDER; RISK FACTOR;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; OREGON; RECURRENCE; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;

EID: 34548590234     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01967.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Drivers with repeat convictions or arrests for driving while impaired: United States. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1994 43 : 759 61.
2. Nochajski T. H., Stasiewicz P. R. Relapse to driving under the influence (DUI): a review. Clin Psychol Rev 2006 26 : 179 95.
3. Wells-Parker E., Bangert-Drowns R., McMillen R., Williams M. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction 1995 90 : 907 26.
4. Hora P. F. A dozen years of drug treatment courts: uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm. Subst Use Misuse 2002 37 : 1469 88.
5. Belenko S. Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review 2001 Update. New York : The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University 2001. Available at: http://www.drugpolicy.org/docUploads/rugcourts. pdf (accessed 16 August 2006).
6. Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project, Drug Courts Program Office, Looking at a Decade of Drug Courts. Washington, DC : Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice 1998. Available at: http://www.ncjrs.gov/html/bja/decade98.htm (accessed 16 August 2006).
7. State of Oregon, Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program. DUII Program Operations Guide. Salem, OR : State of Oregon, Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program 1995.
8. Huddleston C. W., Freeman-Wilson K., Boone D. L. Painting the Current Picture: A National Report Card on Drug Courts and Other Problem Solving Court Programs in the United States. Alexandria, VA : National Drug Court Institute 2004. Available at: http://www.ndci.org/publications/paintingcurrentpicture.pdf (accessed 16 August 2006).
9. Lapham S. C., Kapitula L. R., C'de Baca J., McMillan G. P. Impaired-driving recidivism among repeat offenders following an intensive court-based intervention. Accid Anal Prev 2006 38 : 162 9.
10. Jones R. K., Wiliszowski C. H., Lacey J. H. Evaluation of Alternative Programs for Repeat DWI Offenders. Publication No. DOT HS 808 493. Washington, DC : National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1996. Available at: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/research/pub/hs808493.pdf (accessed 16 August 2006).
11. Jones R. K., Lacey J. H. Evaluation of an Individualized Sanctioning Program for DWI Offenders. Publication no. DOT HS 808 842. Washington, DC : National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1998.
12. MacDonald J. M. The efficacy of the Rio Hondo DUI Court: a 2-year field experiment. Eval Rev 2007 31 : 4 23.
13. Turner S., Greenwood P., Fain T., Deschenes E. Perceptions of drug court: how offenders view ease of program completion, strengths and weaknesses, and the impact on their lives. Natl Drug Court Inst Rev 1999 2 : 61 85.
14. Gottfredson D. C., Exum M. L. The Baltimore City Drug Court: one-year results from a randomized study. J Res Crime Delinq 2002 39 : 337 56.
15. Breckenridge J. F., Winfree L. T., Maupin J. R., Clason D. L. Drunk drivers, DWI 'drug court' treatment, and recidivism: who fails? Justice Res Policy 2000 2 : 87 105.
16. Meyers R. J., Smith J. E. Clinical Guide to Alcohol Treatment: The Community Reinforcement Approach. New York : Guilford Press 1995.
17. Nathan P. E., Niaura R. S. Behavioral assessment and treatment of alcoholism. In : Mendelson, J. H., Mello, N. K., editors. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Alcoholism. 2nd edn. New York : McGraw-Hill 1985, p. 391 455.
18. Jones R. K., Lacey J. H. State of Knowledge of Alcohol-Impaired Driving: Research on Repeat DWI Offenders. Washington, DC : National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2000.
19. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. A Guide to Sentencing DUI Offenders. Publication No. DOT HS 808 365. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Transportation, NHTSA 1996.
20. State of Oregon, Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program. Administrative Rules. Publication No. OAR 415-51-000 through OAR-51-130. Salem, OR : State of Oregon, Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program 1995.
21. State of Oregon, Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program. Chemical Dependency Placement, Continued Stay & Discharge Criteria. Salem, OR : State of Oregon, Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program 1995.
22. Lapham S. C., C'de Baca J., Kapitula L. R., McMillan G. P., Skipper B. J., Lapidus J. Psychiatric disorders in a sample of repeat impaired-driving offenders. J Stud Alcohol 2006 64 : 707 13.
23. Collett D. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. London : Chapman & Hall 1994.
24. Willett J. B., Singer J. D. Investigating onset, cessation, relapse, and recovery: why you should, and how you can, use discrete-time survival analysis to examine event occurrence. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993 61 : 952 65.
25. Efron B. Logistic regression, survival analysis and the Kaplan-Meier curve. J Am Stat Assoc 1998 83 : 414 25.
26. Klein J. P., Moeschberger M. L. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data, 2nd edn. New York : Springer 2003.
27. Belenko S. The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings. Subst Use Misuse 2002 37 : 1635 64.
28. Lilly J. R., Ball R. A., Curry G. D., McMullen J. Electronic monitoring of the drunk driver: a seven-year study of the home confinement alternative. Crime Delinq 1993 39 : 462 84.
29. Beck K. H., Rauch W. J., Baker E. A., Williams A. F. Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: a randomized trial in Maryland. Am J Public Health 1999 89 : 1696 700.
30. Wolfe E., Guydish J., Termondt J. A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrests in a two year follow-up period. J Drug Issues 2002 32 : 1155 72.