Preventing alcohol-related convictions: The effect of a novel curriculum for first-time offenders on DUI recidivism

Traffic Injury Prevention

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 147-152

  Rider, Raamses ^a   Voas, Robert B ^a   Kelley Baker, Tara ^a   Grosz, Milton ^b   Murphy, Bernard ^a  

^a PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^b Florida Department of Highway Safety ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Drunk driving; DUI; Education; Prevention; Recidivism

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL INTOXICATION; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MASS COMMUNICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CURRICULUM; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; ODDS RATIO; RECURRENCE;

EID: 34248585919     PISSN: 15389588     EISSN: 1538957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15389580601111586     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Beck K, Rauch W, Baker E, Williams A. (1999) Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: A random trial in maryland. Am J Public Health, Vol. 89, pp. 1696-1700.
2. Fors S, Rojeck D. (1999) The effect of victim impact panels on DUI/DWI re-arrest rates: A twelve month follow-up. J Stud Alcohol, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 514-520.
3. Hedlund J, Fell J. (1995) Persistent drinking drivers in the U.S. In 39th Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, October 16-18, 1995, Chicago, Il. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Des Plaines, IL, pp. 1-12.
4. MacDonald TK, Zanna MP, Fong GT. (1995) Decision making in altered states: Effects of alcohol on attitudes toward drinking and driving. J Pers Soc Psychol, Vol. 68, No. 6, pp. 973-985.
5. McCarrt AT, Northrup VS. (2004) Effects of enhanced sanctions for high-bac DWI offenders on case dispositions and rates of recidivism. Traffic. Inj Prev, Vol. 5, pp. 270-277.
6. McKnight AJ, Lange JE, McKnight AS. (1995) Why people drink and drive: The basis of drinking-and-driving decisions. In Alcohol, Drugs, and Traffic Safety, Kloeden CN, McLean E, Eds., Vol. 1, Adelaide, Australia, NHMRC, University of Adelaide, pp. 143-147.
7. Nichols JL, Weinstein EB, Ellingstad VS, Struckman-Johnson DL. (1978) The specific deterrent effectiveness of ASAP education and rehabilitation programs. J Safety Res, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 177-187.
8. Rider R, Kelley-Baker T, Voas R, Murphy B, McKnight AJ, Levings C. (2006) The impact of a novel educational curriculum for first-time DUI offenders on intermediate outcomes relevant to DUI recidivism. Accid Anal Prev, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 482-489.
9. Stata [computer program]. Version 8.2. StataCorp, College Station, TX, 2004.
10. Stewart El, Malfetti JL. (1970) Rehabilitation of the drunken driver: A corrective course in phoenix, Arizona, for persons convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol. New York, Teachers College Press.
11. Voas RB, Fisher DA. (2001) Court procedures for handling intoxicated drivers. Alcohol Health Res World, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 32-42.
12. Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R, McMillen R, Williams M. (1995) Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction, Vol. 90, No. 7, pp. 907-926.