Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: Insights from south dakota's 24/7 sobriety project

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Kilmer, Beau ^a   Nicosia, Nancy ^a   Heaton, Paul ^a   Midgette, Greg ^a  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL INTOXICATION; ARTICLE; BREATH ANALYSIS; CAR DRIVING; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; STATISTICS; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; UNITED STATES;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; BREATH TESTS; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOUTH DAKOTA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872506991     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300989     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Harwood HJ. Updating Estimates of the Economic Costs of Alcohol Abuse in the United States: Estimates, Update Methods, and Data. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2000.
2. Bouchery EE, Harwood HJ, Sacks JJ, Simon CJ, Brewer RD. Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41 (5):516-524.
3. Cook PJ. Paying the Tab: The Costs and Benefits of Alcohol Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007.
4. Karberg JC, James DJ. Substance Dependence, Abuse, and Treatment of Jail Inmates, 2002. Bethesda, MD: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2005. Report no. NCJ 209588.
5. National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2009. Available at: http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k9State/AppC.htm#TabC.12. Accessed January 3, 2012.
6. Widmark EMP. Principles and Applications of Medicolegal Alcohol Determination. Berlin, Germany: Urban & Schwartzenberg; 1932.
7. Rivara FP, Dunn C, Simpson E. Addressing Alcohol Impaired Driving: Training Physicians to Detect and Counsel Their Patients Who Drink Heavily. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2000. Available at: http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/alcohol/impaired-driving/content.html. Accessed January 3, 2012.
8. Lacey JH, Kelley-Baker T, Furr-Holden D, et al. 2007 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers: Alcohol Results. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2009. Available at: http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/Traffic%20Injury%20Control/Articles/ Associated%20Files/811248.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2012.
9. Witte AD. Estimating the economic model of crime with individual data. Q J Econ. 1980;94:57-87.
10. Grogger J. Certainty versus severity of punishment. Econ Inq. 1991;29:297-309.
11. Eide E. Economics of criminal behavior. In: Boudewijn B, De Greest G, eds. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Vol. 5, The Economics of Crime and Litigation. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar; 2000: 345-389.
12. Hawken A, Kleiman MAR. Managing Drug Involved ProbationersWith Swift and Certain Sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii's HOPE. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2009. Report no. 229023. Available at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/ pdffiles1/nij/grants/229023.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2012.
13. Durlauf SN, Nagin DS. Imprisonment and crime: can both be reduced? Criminol Public Policy. 2011;10(1):13-54.
14. Ainslie G, Haslam N. Hyper-bolic discounting. In: Loewenstein G, Elster J, eds. Choice Over Time. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1992: 57-92.
15. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein GF, Cohen JD. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science. 2004;306(5695):503-507. (Pubitemid 39372453)
16. Vuchinich RE, Simpson CA. Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998;6(3):292-305. (Pubitemid 28393947)
17. Petry NM. Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001;154 (3):243-250. (Pubitemid 32247185)
18. Gruchow M. Added space creates extra cash for jail: sobriety program leads to a new source of funds. Sioux Falls Argus-Leader. January 12, 2009: A1.
19. Loudenburg R, Drube G, Leonardson G. South Dakota 24/7 Sobriety Program Evaluation Findings. Pierre, SD: Attorney General of South Dakota; 2010. Available at: http://apps.sd.gov/atg/dui247/AnalysisSD24.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2012.
20. Caulkins JP, Dupont RL. Is 24/7 sobriety a good goal for repeat driving under the influence (DUI) offenders? Addiction. 2010;105(4):575-577.
21. South Dakota House Bill 1072, 2007. Available at: http://legis.state.sd. us/sessions/2007/bills/HB1072enr. htm. Accessed October 25, 2012.
22. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Surveys on Drug Use and Health, 2010. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available at: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/ 2k10NSDUH/2k10Results.htm#3.1.2. Accessed January 3, 2012.
23. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, non-seasonally adjusted. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2011. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/lau. Accessed July 20, 2011.
24. National Climatic Data Center. Asheville, NC: National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration; 2011. Available at: http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/pls/ plclimprod/poemain.accessrouter?datasetabbv=SOD. Accessed May 31, 2011.
25. South Dakota Department of Transportation. 2001-2010 VMT - All Vehicles [as of May 2, 2011]. Available at: http://www.sddot.com/transportation/highways/ traffic/docs/VMTAllvehicles.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2012.
26. US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Police Employee (LEOKA) Data, 2000-2009. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Distributor; 2002. Available at: http://www. icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/NACJD/guides/ucr. html. Accessed August 8, 2011.
27. US Census Bureau. County business patterns 2001-2010. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau; 2011. Available at: http://www.census.gov/econ/cbp/index.html. Accessed October 5, 2011.
28. National Center for Health Statistics. Postcensal estimates of the resident population of the United States for July 1, 2000-July 1, 2009, by year, county, age, bridged race, Hispanic origin, and sex, 2000-2009. Prepared under a collaborative arrangement with the US Census Bureau. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. Available at: http://www.cdc. gov/nchs/nvss/bridged-race.htm. Accessed July 31, 2010.
29. Wooldridge J. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002.
30. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullianathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ. 2004;119(1):249-275. (Pubitemid 38361206)
31. Rogers PN. The general deterrent impact of California's 0.08% blood alcohol concentration limit and administrative per se license suspension laws. In: An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of California's 0.08% Blood Alcohol Concentration Limit and Administrative Per Se License Suspension Laws. Vol 1. Sacramento, CA: California Office of Traffic Safety; 1995.
32. Voas RB, Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Beirness DJ. The Alberta Interlock Program: the evaluation of a provincewide program on DUI recidivism. Addiction. 1999;94 (12):1849-1859.
33. Kenkel DS. Drinking, driving, and deterrence: the effectiveness and social costs of alternative policies. J Law Econ. 1993;36(2):877-913.