Interlocks for first offenders: Effective?

Traffic Injury Prevention

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 346-352

  Roth, Richard ^a   Voas, Robert ^b   Marques, Paul ^b  

^a Impact DWI   (United States)

^b PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol; DUI; DWI; First offender; Interlock

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL INTOXICATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BREATH ANALYSIS; CAR; CAR DRIVING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MANDATORY PROGRAM; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; SOCIAL CONTROL; UNITED STATES;

ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; AUTOMOBILES; BREATH TESTS; ETHANOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; NEW MEXICO; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;

EID: 36248982644     PISSN: 15389588     EISSN: 1538957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15389580701598559     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Beck K, Rauch W, Baker E, Williams A. (1999) Effects of Ignition Interlock License Restrictions on Drivers with Multiple Alcohol Offenses: A Random Trial in Maryland, Am. J. Public Health, Vol. 89, pp.1696-1700.
2. DeYoung DJ, Tashima HN, Maston SV. (2005) An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock in California, in Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices-Volume II: Research, Policy, and Program Status 2005, Marques PR, Ed., International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, Oosterhout, The Netherlands, pp. 42-52.
3. Frank JF, Raub R, Lucke RE, Wark RI. (2002) Illinois Ignition Interlock Evaluation, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, Mayhew DR, Dussault C, Eds., Société de l'assurance automobile du Québec, Quebec City, pp. 105-109.
4. Jones B, Ed. (1992) The Effectiveness of Oregon's Ignition Interlock Program, Verlag TUV Rheinland, Cologne, Germany. Utzelmann HD, Berghaus G, Kroj G, Eds., Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety - T92, Band 3.
5. Morse BJ, Elliott DS. (1992) Effects of Ignition Interlock Devices on DUI Recidivism.: Findings from a Longitudinal Study in Hamilton County, Ohio, Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 38(2), pp. 131-157.
6. Roth R, Voas R, Marques P. (2007) Mandating Interlocks for Fully Suspended Offenders: The New Mexico Experience, Traffic Inj. Prev. Vol. 8(1), pp. 20-25.
7. Tippetts AS, Voas RB. (1998) The Effectiveness of the West Virginia Interlock Program, J. Traffic Med., Vol. 26(1-2), pp. 19-24.
8. Vezina L. (2002) The Quebec Alcohol Ignition Interlock Program: Impact on Recidivism and Crashes, in Proceedings of T2002-The16th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, Mayhew D, Dussault C, Eds., International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, Montreal.
9. Voas RB. (1986) Evaluation of Jail as a Penalty for Drunken Driving, Alcohol, Drugs and Driving: Abstracts and Reviews, Vol. 2(2), pp. 47-70.
10. Voas RB, Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Beirness DJ. (1999) The Alberta Interlock Program: The Evaluation of a Province-Wide Program on DUI Recidivism, Addiction, Vol. 94(12), pp. 1849-1859.
11. Wagenaar AC, Maldonado-Molina MM, Erickson DJ, Ma L, Tobler AL, Komro, KA (2007, in press) General Deterrence Effects of U.S. Statutory DUI Fine and Jail Penalties: Long-Term Follow-Up in 32 states, AAP.
12. Weinrath M.(1997) The Ignition Interlock Program for Drunk Drivers: A Multivariate Test, Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 43(1), pp. 42-59.
13. Willis C, Lybrand S, Bellamy N. (2004) Alcohol Ignition Interlock Programs for Reducing Drink Driving Recidivism, Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. 4, p. CD004168.