A category approach to predicting the developmental (neuro) toxicity of organotin compounds: The value of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryotoxicity test (ZET)

Reproductive Toxicology

Volumn 41, Issue , 2013, Pages 35-44

  Beker van Woudenberg, Anna ^a   Wolterbeek, André ^a   te Brake, Lindsey ^a   Snel, Cor ^a   Menke, Aswin ^a   Rubingh, Carina ^a   de Groot, Didima ^a   Kroese, Dinant ^a  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alternative model; Biological verification; Developmental (neuro) toxicity; Grouping; Organotins; Read across; Zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET)

Indexed keywords

DIBUTYLTIN DICHLORIDE; DIMETHYLTIN DICHLORIDE; DIOCTYLTIN DICHLORIDE; MONOBUTYLTIN TRICHLORIDE; MONOMETHYLTIN TRICHLORIDE; MONOOCTYLTIN TRICHLORIDE; ORGANOTIN COMPOUND; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CELL DEGENERATION; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STRUCTURES; EMBRYOTOXICITY; EYE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROTOXICITY; NONHUMAN; STARTLE REFLEX; SURVIVAL RATE; TOXICITY TESTING; ZEBRA FISH;

DANIO RERIO; RODENTIA;

ALTERNATIVE MODEL; BIOLOGICAL VERIFICATION; DEVELOPMENTAL (NEURO) TOXICITY; GROUPING; ORGANOTINS; READ ACROSS; ZEBRAFISH EMBRYOTOXICITY TEST (ZET);

ANIMALS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; ORGANOTIN COMPOUNDS; STARTLE REACTION; TAIL; TERATOGENS; TOXICITY TESTS; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84882587550     PISSN: 08906238     EISSN: 18731708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.06.067     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. European Commission (EC) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Comission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 2007 2007, 136:3-280.
2. van der Jagt K, Munn S, Tørsløv J, de Bruijn J. Alternative approaches can reduce the use of animals under REACH 2004; EUR 21 405 EN:1-31.
3. Adler S., Basketter D., Creton S., Pelkonen O., Van Benthem J., Zuang V., et al. Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010. Archives of Toxicology 2011, 85:367-485.
4. Schenk B., Weimer M., Bremer S., van der Burg B., Cortvrindt R., Freyberger A., et al. The ReProTect Feasibility Study, a novel comprehensive in vitro approach to detect reproductive toxicants. Reproductive Toxicology 2010, 30:200-218.
5. Pamies D., Martinéz C.E., Sogorb M.A., Vilanova E. Mechanism-based models in reproductive and development toxicology. Reproductive and developmental toxicology 2011, 135-146. Academic Press-Elsevier, San Diego, CA, USA.
6. van der Burg B., Kroese E.D., Piersma A.H. Towards a pragmatic alternative testing strategy for the detection of reproductive toxicants. Reproductive Toxicology 2011, 31:558-561.
7. Piersma A.H. Innovations in testing strategies in reproductive toxicology. Methods in Molecular Biology 2013, 947:327-341.
8. Hanway R.H., Evans P.F. Read-across of toxicological data in the notification of new chemicals. Toxicology Letters 2000, 116:61.
9. Combes R., Barratt M., Balls M. An overall strategy for the testing of chemicals for human hazard and risk assessment under the EU REACH system. ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 2003, 31:7-19.
10. Fabjan E., Hulzebos E., Mennes W., Piersma A.H. A category approach for reproductive effects of phthalates. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 2006, 36:695-726.
11. Goldsmith J.R., Jobin C. Think small: Zebrafish as a model system of human pathology. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2012, 201:2. 10.1155/2012/817341.
12. Lieschke G.J., Currie P.D. Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view. Nature Reviews. Genetics 2007, 8:353-367.
13. Parng C., Seng W.L., Semino C., McGrath P. Zebrafish: a preclinical model for drug screening. Assay and Drug Development Technologies 2002, 1:41-48.
14. Fleming A. Zebrafish as an alternative model organism for disease modelling and drug discovery: implications for the 3Rs. NC3Rs 2007, 10:1-7. http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/.
15. European Commission (EC) EU. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union L 2010 2010, 276:33-79.
16. Belanger S.E., Balon E.K., Rawlings J.M. Saltatory ontogeny of fishes and sensitive early life stages for ecotoxicology tests. Aquatic Toxicology 2010, 97:88-95.
17. Strähle U., Scholz S., Geisler R., Greiner P., Hollert H., Rastegar S., et al. Zebrafish embryos as an alternative to animal experiments - a commentary on the definition of the onset of protected life stages in animal welfare regulations. Reproductive Toxicology 2012, 33:128-132.
18. Kimmel C.B., Ballard W.W., Kimmel S.R., Ullmann B., Schilling T.F. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Developmental Dynamics 1995, 203:253-310.
19. Sukardi H., Chng H.T., Chan E.C.Y., Gong Z., Lam S.H. Zebrafish for drug toxicity screening: bridging the in vitro cell-based models and in vivo mammalian models. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology 2011, 7:579-589.
20. de Jong E., Louisse J., Verwei M., Blaauboer B.J., van de Sandt J.J.M., Woutersen R.A., et al. Relative developmental toxicity of glycol ether alkoxy acid metabolites in the embryonic stem cell test as compared with the in vivo potency of their parent compounds. Toxicological Sciences 2009, 110:117-124.
21. Hefter R., Hernandez O., Sayre P. Development of chemical categories in the HPV challenge program. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1999, 1-16. http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/categuid.htm.
22. Hermsen S.A.B., van den Brandhof E., van der Ven L.T.M., Piersma A.H. Relative embryotoxicity of two classes of chemicals in a modified zebrafish embryotoxicity test and comparison with their in vivo potencies. Toxicology In Vitro 2011, 25:745-753.
23. World Health Organization (WHO) Mono-and disubstituted methyltin, butyltin, and octyltin compounds. Concise international chemical assessment document 2006, 73.
24. Westerfield M. The zebrafish book: a guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio) 2007, University of Oregon press, Eugene, OR, USA. 5th ed.
25. OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals. Draft proposal for a new guideline Fish Embryo Toxicity (FET) test 2006.
26. Baxter J. Pattern and variety in development. Fish physiology 1988, 1-58. Academic press, San Diego, USA. W.S. Hoar, D.J. Randall (Eds.).
27. Fraysse B., Mons R., Garric J. Development of a zebrafish 4-day embryo-larval bioassay to assess toxicity of chemicals. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2006, 63:253-267.
28. DIN Basivalidierung genormter verfahre zur wasser-,abwasser-,und schlammuntersuchung validierungsdokument (38415-T6) 2002, 27.
29. de Esch C., van der Linde H., Slieker R., Willemsen R., Wolterbeek A., Woutersen R., et al. Locomotor activity assay in zebrafish larvae: influence of age, strain and ethanol. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 2012, 34:425-433.
30. MacPhail R.C., Brooks J., Hunter D.L., Padnos B., Irons T.D., Padilla S. Locomotion in larval zebrafish: influence of time of day, lighting and ethanol. Neurotoxicology 2009, 30:52-58.
31. Jenkins S.M., Ehman K., Barone S. Structure-activity comparison of organotin species: dibutyltin is a developmental neurotoxicant in vitro and in vivo. Development in Brain Research 2004, 151:1-12.
32. Janer G., Hakkert B.C., Piersma A.H., Vermeire T., Slob W. A retrospective analysis of the added value of the rat two-generation reproductive toxicity study versus the rat subchronic toxicity study. Reproductive Toxicology 2007, 24:103-113.
33. Ton C., Lin Y., Willett C. Zebrafish as a model for developmental neurotoxicity testing. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology 2006, 76:553-567.
34. McGrath P., Li C. Zebrafish: a predictive model for assessing drug-induced toxicity. Drug Discovery Today 2008, 13:394-401.
35. Hagenaars A., Vergauwen L., De Coen W., Knapen D. Structure-activity relationship assessment of four perfluorinated chemicals using a prolonged zebrafish early life stage test. Chemosphere 2011, 82:764-772.
36. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) - Committee for Risk Assessment RAC. Annex 1:Background document to the Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at Community level of Dimethyltin dichloride. 2012;CLH-O-0000001701-83-03/A1.
37. European Chemicals Agency ECHA CLH report: proposal for harmonised classification and labelling; Trichloromethylstannane(MMTC) 2010.
38. Noland E.A., Taylor D.H., Bull R.J. Monomethyl- and trimethyltin compounds induce learning deficiencies in young rats. Neurobehavioral Toxicology and Teratology 1982, 4:539-544.
39. Moser V.C., Barone S., Phillips P.M., McDaniel K.L., Ehman K.D. Evaluation of developmental neurotoxicity of organotins via drinking water in rats: Monomethyl tin. Neurotoxicology 2006, 27:409-420.