Incorporating human-factors in car-following models: A review of recent developments and research needs

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 48, Issue , 2014, Pages 379-403

  Saifuzzaman, Mohammad ^a   Zheng, Zuduo ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Car following; Driver behavior; Driver error; Human factors; Risk taking

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; RISK MANAGEMENT; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

CAR FOLLOWING; CAR FOLLOWING MODELS; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; DRIVER ERROR; DRIVING SITUATIONS; RISK TAKING; TRAFFIC BREAKDOWN; TRAFFIC ENGINEER;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CAR USE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84908594446     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Ahmed K.I. Modeling Drivers' Acceleration and Lane Changing Behavior 1999, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2. Alexiadis V., Colyar J., Halkias J., Hranac R., McHale G. The next generation simulation program. ITE J. 2004, 74(8):22-26.
3. Andersen G.J., Sauer C.W. Optical information for car following: the driving by visual angle (DVA) model. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 2007, 49(5):878-896.
4. Bando M., Hasebe K., Nakayama A., Shibata A., Sugiyama Y. Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys. Rev. E 1995, 51(2):1035-1042.
5. Bando M., Hasebe K., Nakanishi K., Nakayama A. Analysis of optimal velocity model with explicit delay. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58(5):5429-5435.
6. Barceló J. Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation 2010, Springer.
7. Barceló J., Casas J. Dynamic network simulation with AIMSUN simulation approaches. Simulation Approaches in Transportation Analysis 2005, 57-98. Springer. R. Kitamura, M. Kuwahara (Eds.).
8. Bevrani K., Chung E. A safety adapted car following model for traffic safety studies. Advances in Human Aspects of Road and Rail Transportation 2012, 550-559. CRC Press, USA. N.A. Stanton (Ed.).
9. Boer E.R. Car following from the driver's perspective. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 1999, 2(4):201-206.
10. Boer, E.R., Hoedemaeker, M., 1998. Modeling driver behavior with different degrees of automation: a hierarchical decision framework of interacting mental models. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control, Valenciennes, France.
11. Brackstone M., McDonald M. Car-following: a historical review. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 1999, 2(4):181-196.
12. Brackstone, M., McDonald, M., Wu, J., 1998. Lane changing on the motorway: Factors affecting its occurrence, and their implications. In: 9th International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control, London, UK.
13. Brackstone M., Sultan B., McDonald M. Motorway driver behaviour: studies on car following. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2002, 5(1):31-46.
14. Brockfeld E., Kühne R.D., Wagner P. Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic flow models. Transp. Res. Rec. 2004, 1876(1):62-70.
15. Chandler R.E., Herman R., Montroll E.W. Traffic dynamics: studies in car following. Oper. Res. 1958, 6(2):165-184.
16. Chen D., Laval J., Zheng Z., Ahn S. A behavioral car-following model that captures traffic oscillations. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2012, 46(6):744-761.
17. Chen D., Laval J., Ahn S., Zheng Z. Microscopic traffic hysteresis in traffic oscillations: a behavioral perspective. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2012, 46(10):1440-1453.
18. Chen D., Ahn S., Laval J., Zheng Z. On the periodicity of traffic oscillations and capacity drop: the role of driver characteristics. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2014, 59:117-136.
19. Davis L. Modifications of the optimal velocity traffic model to include delay due to driver reaction time. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 2003, 319:557-567.
20. Edie L.C. Car-following and steady-state theory for noncongested traffic. Oper. Res. 1961, 9(1):66-76.
21. Fancher P.S., Bareket Z. Evolving model for studying driver-vehicle system performance in longitudinal control of headway. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1998, 1631(1):13-19.
22. Farah H., Koutsopoulos H.N., Saifuzzaman M., Kölbl R., Fuchs S., Bankosegger D. Evaluation of the effect of cooperative infrastructure-to-vehicle systems on driver behavior. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2012, 21(1):42-56.
23. Fellendorf M., Vortisch P. Microscopic traffic flow simulator VISSIM. Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation 2010, 63-93. Springer, New York. J. Barceló (Ed.).
24. Ferrari P. The effect of driver behaviour on motorway reliability. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 1989, 23(2):139-150.
25. FHWA, 1985. Freeway Data Collection for Studying Vehicle Interactions. Technical Report FHWA/RD-85/108, Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, McLean, VA.
26. Fritzsche H.T. A model for traffic simulation. Traffic Eng. Control 1994, 35(5):317-321.
27. Gazis D.C., Herman R., Rothery R.W. Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Oper. Res. 1961, 9(4):545-567.
28. Gipps P.G. A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 1981, 15(2):105-111.
29. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning 1989, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc, Reading, MA.
30. Gomes G., May A., Horowitz R. Calibration of VISSIM for a Congested Freeway 2004, California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH).
31. Gong H., Liu H., Wang B.H. An asymmetric full velocity difference car-following model. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 2008, 387(11):2595-2602.
32. Gray R., Regan D. Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Res. 1998, 38(4):499-512.
33. Greenshields B.D., Bibbins J., Channing W., Miller H. A study of traffic capacity. Proc. Highway Res. Board 1935, 14:448-477.
34. Hamdar S. Driver behavior modeling. Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles 2012, 537-558. Springer. A. Eskandarian (Ed.).
35. Hamdar S.H., Mahmassani H.S. From existing accident-free car-following models to colliding vehicles: exploration and assessment. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2008, 2088(1):45-56.
36. Hamdar S.H., Treiber M., Mahmassani H.S., Kesting A. Modeling driver behavior as sequential risk-taking task. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2008, 2088(1):208-217.
37. Hamdar, S.H., Mahmassani, H.S., Treiber, M., 2014. From Behavioral Psychology to Acceleration Modeling: Calibration, Validation, and Exploration of Drivers Cognitive and Safety Parameters in a Risk-taking Environment. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1403.4980.
38. Hancock P. Is car following the real question-are equations the answer?. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 1999, 2(4):197-199.
39. Haque M.M., Washington S. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations. Accid. Anal. Prevent. 2014, 62:42-53.
40. Heino, A., 1996. Risk taking in car driving: Perceptions, individual differences and effects of safety incentives. Ph.D.Thesis. University of Groningen, Netherlands.
41. Helbing D., Tilch B. Generalized force model of traffic dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58(1):133-138.
42. Helly, W., 1959. Simulation of bottlenecks in single-lane traffic flow. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow, Research Laboratories, General Motors, New York.
43. Herman, R., Rothery, R.W., 1965. Car following and steady-state flow. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow, OECD, Paris.
44. Herman R., Montroll E.W., Potts R.B., Rothery R.W. Traffic dynamics: analysis of stability in car following. Oper. Res. 1959, 7(1):86-106.
45. Hoffmann E.R., Mortimer R.G. Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles. Accid. Anal. Prevent. 1996, 28(4):415-421.
46. Hoogendoorn S.P., Hoogendoorn R. Generic calibration framework for joint estimation of car-following models by using microscopic data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2010, 2188:37-45.
47. Hoogendoorn, S.P., Ossen, S., 2005. Parameter estimation and analysis of car-following models. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
48. Ištoka Otković I., Tollazzi T., Šraml M. Calibration of microsimulation traffic model using neural network approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40(15):5965-5974.
49. Jiang R., Wu Q., Zhu Z. Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 64:017101.
50. Jin S., Wang D.H., Huang Z.Y., Tao P.F. Visual angle model for car-following theory. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 2011, 390(11):1931-1940.
51. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-291.
52. Kesting A., Treiber M. Calibrating car-following models using trajectory data: methodological study. Transp. Res. Rec. 2008, 2088:148-156.
53. Kikuchi S., Chakroborty P. Car-following model based on fuzzy inference system. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1992, 1365:82-91.
54. Kometani, E., Sasaki, T., 1959. Dynamic behaviour of traffic with a non-linear spacing-speed relationship. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow, Research Laboratories, General Motors, New York.
55. Koshi M., Kuwahara M., Akahane H. Capacity of sags and tunnels on Japanese motorways. ITE J. 1992, 62(5):17-22.
56. Koutsopoulos H.N., Farah H. Latent class model for car following behavior. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2012, 46(5):563-578.
57. Krauss S., Wagner P. Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 55(5):5597-5602.
58. Krauss S., Wagner P., Gawron C. Continuous limit of the Nagel-Schreckenberg model. Phys. Rev. E 1996, 54(4):3707-3712.
59. Lagarias J.C., Reeds J.A., Wright M.H., Wright P.E. Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J. Optim. 1998, 9(1):112-147.
60. Laval J.A., Leclercq L. A mechanism to describe the formation and propagation of stop-and-go waves in congested freeway traffic. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 2010, 368(1928):4519-4541.
61. Lee G. A generalization of linear car-following theory. Oper. Res. 1966, 14(4):595-606.
62. Lee J.D., Young K.L., Regan M.A. Defining driver distraction. Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation 2008, 31-40. CRC Press, USA. M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee, K.L. Young (Eds.).
63. Lenz H., Wagner C., Sollacher R. Multi-anticipative car-following model. Eur. Phys. J. B - Condensed Matter Complex Syst. 1999, 7(2):331-335.
64. Lighthill, M.J., Whitham, G.B., 1955. On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 229 (1178), 317-345.
65. Lownes N.E., Machemehl R.B. Sensitivity of simulated capacity to VISSIM driver behavior parameter modification. Transp. Res. Rec. 2006, 1988:102-110.
66. Maerivoet S., De Moor B. Cellular automata models of road traffic. Phys. Rep. 2005, 419(1):1-64.
67. McEvoy, S., Stevenson, M., 2007. An exploration of the role of driver distraction in serious road crashes. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Distractions in Driving, Sydney, Australia.
68. Michaels, R., 1963. Perceptual factors in car following. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow, OECD, London, UK.
69. Michaels R., Cozan L. Perceptual and field factors causing lateral displacement. Highway Res. Rec. 1963, 25:1-13.
70. Muhrer E., Vollrath M. The effect of visual and cognitive distraction on driver's anticipation in a simulated car following scenario. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2011, 14(6):555-566.
71. Nagel K., Schreckenberg M. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J. de Physique I 1992, 2(12):2221-2229.
72. Neumann J. The general and logical theory of automata. Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior 1948, 1-41. Wiley, New York. L.A. Jeffress (Ed.).
73. Newell G.F. Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following. Oper. Res. 1961, 9(2):209-229.
74. Newell G.F. A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2002, 36(3):195-205.
75. Olstam J.J., Tapani A. Comparison of Car-following Models 2004, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute.
76. Ossen S., Hoogendoorn S.P. Validity of trajectory-based calibration approach of car-following models in presence of measurement errors. Transp. Res. Rec. 2008, 2088:117-125.
77. Ossen S., Hoogendoorn S.P. Heterogeneity in car-following behavior: theory and empirics. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2011, 19(2):182-195.
78. Panwai S., Dia H. Comparative evaluation of microscopic car-following behavior. IEEE Transact. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2005, 6(3):314-325.
79. Park, B., Qi, H., 2006. Microscopic simulation model calibration and validation for freeway work zone network-a case study of VISSIM. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference. ITSC'06. IEEE, pp. 1471-1476.
80. Parker D., Reason J.T., Manstead A.S.R., Stradling S.G. Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics 1995, 38(5):1036-1048.
81. Peng G., Sun D. A dynamical model of car-following with the consideration of the multiple information of preceding cars. Phys. Lett. A 2010, 374(15):1694-1698.
82. Pipes L.A. An operational analysis of traffic dynamics. J. Appl. Phys. 1953, 24(3):274-281.
83. Przybyla, J., Taylor, J., Jupe, J., Zhou, X., 2012. Simplified, data-driven, errorable car-following model to predict the safety effects of distracted driving. In: Proceedings of the 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Alaska, USA, pp. 1149-1154.
84. Reason J. Human Error 1990, Cambridge University Press.
85. Reuschel A. Fahrzeugbewegungen in der Kolonne. Oesterreichisches. Ingenieur-Archiv 1950, 4(3/4):193-215.
86. Rhodes N., Pivik K. Age and gender differences in risky driving: the roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accid. Anal. Prevent. 2011, 43(3):923-931.
87. Richards P.I. Shock waves on the highway. Oper. Res. 1956, 4(1):42-51.
88. Ross T.J. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications 2010, John Wiley & Sons.
89. Siuhi, S., Kaseko, M.S., 2010. Parametric study of stimulus-response behavior for car-following models. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, USA.
90. Stanton N.A., Salmon P.M. Human error taxonomies applied to driving: a generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Saf. Sci. 2009, 47(2):227-237.
91. Stutts J.C. Distractions in Everyday Driving 2003, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC.
92. Subramanian H. Estimation of Car-following Models 1996, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
93. Talebpour A., Mahmassani H.S., Hamdar S.H. Multiregime sequential risk-taking model of car-following behavior. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2011, 2260(1):60-66.
94. Toledo T. Driving behaviour: models and challenges. Transp. Rev. 2007, 27(1):65-84.
95. Treiber M., Helbing D. Memory effects in microscopic traffic models and wide scattering in flow-density data. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 68(4). 046119-1-046119-8.
96. Treiber M., Kesting A. Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation 2013, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642-32459-8.
97. Treiber M., Hennecke A., Helbing D. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62(2):1805.
98. Treiber M., Kesting A., Helbing D. Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 2006, 360(1):71-88.
99. Van Winsum W. The human element in car following models. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 1999, 2(4):207-211.
100. Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 1949, Princeton University Press.
101. Wang W., Zhang W., Guo H., Bubb H., Ikeuchi K. A safety-based approaching behavioural model with various driving characteristics. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2011, 19(6):1202-1214.
102. Wiedemann, R., 1974. Simulation des StraBenverkehrsflusses. In: Proceedings of the Schriftenreihe des tnstituts fir Verkehrswesen der Universitiit Karlsruhe, Germany.
103. Wolfram S. Statistical mechanics of cellular automata. Rev. Modern Phys. 1983, 55(3):601-644.
104. Wu J., Brackstone M., McDonald M. Fuzzy sets and systems for a motorway microscopic simulation model. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2000, 116(1):65-76.
105. Xing, J., 1995. A parameter identification of a car following model. In: Steps Forward. Intelligent Transport Systems World Congress, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 1739-1745.
106. Yang H.H., Peng H. Development of an errorable car-following driver model. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2010, 48(6):751-773.
107. Young K.L., Salmon P.M. Examining the relationship between driver distraction and driving errors: a discussion of theory, studies and methods. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50(2):165-174.
108. Zheng Z. Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2014, 60:16-32.
109. Zheng Z., Ahn S., Chen D., Laval J. Applications of wavelet transform for analysis of freeway traffic: bottlenecks, transient traffic, and traffic oscillations. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2011, 45(2):372-384.
110. Zheng Z., Ahn S., Chen D., Laval J. Freeway traffic oscillations: microscopic analysis of formations and propagations using wavelet transform. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2011, 45(9):1378-1388.
111. Zheng Z., Ahn S., Chen D., Laval J. The effects of lane-changing on the immediate follower: anticipation, relaxation, and change in driver characteristics. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2013, 26:367-379.