Development of an errorable car-following driver model

Vehicle System Dynamics

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 751-773

  Yang, H H ^a   Peng, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Active safety; Car following; Driver errors; Driver model

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SAFETY; ACTIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS; CAR-FOLLOWING; CRASH RATE; DRIVER ERROR; DRIVER MODELS; DRIVING DATABASE; DRIVING TASKS; HUMAN DRIVERS; IDENTIFICATION PROCESS; LEAD VEHICLES; LEAST SQUARES; REAR-END COLLISIONS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC STATISTICS;

RANDOM PROCESSES; TRAFFIC SURVEYS;

ERRORS;

EID: 77952598578     PISSN: 00423114     EISSN: 17445159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00423110903128524     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. J. Stutts, Distraction in Everyday Driving, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety,Washington, DC, 2003.
2. S.G. Klauer, T.A. Dingus, V.L. Neale, J.D. Sudweeks, and D.J. Ramsey, The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk, NHTSA, DOT HS 810 594, 2006.
3. National HighwayTraffic SafetyAdmission (NHTSA),Traffic SafetyFacts 2005:ACompilation of MotorVehicle Crash Data from Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, US Department of Transportation,Washington, DC, 2005.
4. L.A. Pipes, An operational analysis of traffic dynamics, J. Appl. Phys. 24 (1953), pp. 271-281.
5. R.E. Chandler, R. Herman, and E.W. Montroll, Traffic dynamics: studies in car-following, Oper. Res. 6 (1958), pp. 165-184.
6. D.C. Gazis, R. Herman, and R.W. Rothery, Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow, Oper. Res. 9(4) (1961), pp. 545-567.
7. R. Herman and R.B. Potts, Single Lane Traffic Theory and Experiment, Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow Research Labs, GM, Elsevier, NewYork, 1959.
8. J. Treiterer and J.J.A. Myers, The Hysteresis Phenomenon in Traffic Flow, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Transportation Theory Sydney, 1974, pp. 13-38.
9. H. Ozaki, Reaction and Anticipation in the Car-following Behavior, Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Traffic and Transportation Theory, pp. 349-366.
10. G.F. Newell, Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car-following, Oper. Res. 9(2) (1961), pp. 209-229.
11. W. Helly, Simulation of Bottlenecks in Single Lane Traffic Flow, Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow, Research Labs, GM, Elsevier, NewYork, 1959.
12. J. Tyler, The characteristic of model-following systems as synthesized by optimal control, Autom. Control, IEEE Trans. 9(4) (1964), pp. 485-498.
13. G.O. Burnham, J. Seo, and G.A. Bekey, Identification of human driver models in car-following, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control ACT 9 (1974), pp. 485-498.
14. P.G. Gipps, Behavioral car-following model for computer simulation, Transport. Res. 15B(2) (1981), pp. 105-111.
15. M. Bando, K. Hasebe, K. Nakanishi, A. Nakayama, A. Shibata, and Y. Sugiyama, Phenomenological study of dynamical model of traffic flow, J. Phys. I France 5 (1995), pp. 1389-1399.
16. R.M. Michael, Perceptual Factors in Car-following, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow, 1963, pp. 44-59.
17. D.N. Lee, A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision, Perception 5(4) (1976), pp. 437-459.
18. E.H.Yilmaz andW.H.Warren, Visual control of braking: a test of the tau-dot hypothesis, J. Exp. Psychol. 21(5) (1995), pp. 996-1014.
19. U. Reiter, Empirical Studies as Basis for Traffic Flow Models, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Highway Capacity vol. 2, 1993, pp. 493-502.
20. M. Brackstone, B. Sultan, and M. McDonald, Motorway driver behavior: studies on car-following, Transport. Res. 5(1) (2002), pp. 329-344.
21. K. Nagel and M. Schreckenberg, A cellular automation model for freeway traffic, J. Phys. France 2 (1992), pp. 2221-2229.
22. S. Krauss, P.Wagner, and C. Grawron, Continuous limit of the Nagel-Schreckenberg model, Phys. Rev. E 54(4) (1996), pp. 3707-3712.
23. D. Jost and K. Nagel, Probabilistic traffic flow breakdown in stochastic car-following models, Transport. Res. Record 1852 (2003), pp. 152-158.
24. P.Wagner and I. Lubashevsky, Empirical basis for car-following theory development, Statist. Mech., 0311192 2006.
25. S.J. Brunson, E.M. Kyle, N.C. Phamdo, and G.R. Preziotti, NHTSA rear-end collision alert algorithm final report, NHTSA, DOT HS 809 526, 2002.
26. D. LeBlanc, Road Departure Crash Warning System Field Operational Test: Methodology and Results, Vol.1, Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, DTFH61-01-X-0053, 2006.
27. A.M. Mood, F.A. Graybill, and D.C. Boes, Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974, pp. 540-541.
28. K. Lee and H. Peng, Evaluation of automotive forward collision warning and collision avoidance algorithm, Vehicle System Dynamics 43(10) (2005), pp. 735-751. (Pubitemid 41605069)
29. R. Dewar and P. Olson, Human Factors in Traffic Safety, 2nd ed., Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, Inc.
30. R. Henderson and A. Burg, Vision and Audition in Driving, Final Report, NHTSA, DOT HS 801-1265, 1974.
31. J.J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979.
32. D.R. Proffitt, Distance perception, Curr. Directions Psychol. Sci. 15(3) (2006), pp. 131-135.
33. K. Nakayama and C.W. Tyler, Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues, Vis. Res. 21 (1981), pp. 427-433.
34. S.P. McKee, A local mechanism for differential velocity detection, Vis. Res. 21 (1980), pp. 491-500.
35. R.H. Brown, Weber ratio for visual discrimination of velocity, Science 131(3416) (1960), pp. 1809-1810.
36. J.M. Harris and S.N.J. Watamaniuk, Speed discrimination of motion-in-depth using binocular cues, Vis. Res. 35(7) (1995), pp. 885-896.
37. S.N.J. Watamaniuk, Perceptual and oculomotor evidence of limitations on processing acceleration motion, J. Vis. [1534-7362], 3 (11) (2003), pp. 698-709.
38. A. Pick and D. Cole, Neuromuscular dynamics and the vehicle steering task, Vehicle System Dynamics 41 (2004), p. 182.
39. M. Lesch, L. Simmons, and P.A. Hancock, The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver, Accident Anal. Prev. 35 (2003), pp. 501-514.
40. H. Alm and L. Nilsson, The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behavior in a car-following situation, Accident Anal. Prev. 27(5) (1995), pp. 705-715.
41. D. Lamble et al., Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car-following situations: safety implication for using mobile telephone while driving, Accident Anal. Prev. 31 (1999), pp. 617-623.
42. J. Stutts, The Role of Driver Distraction in Traffic Crashes, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington DC, 2001.
43. T.B. Sheridan, Driver distraction from a control theory perspective, Human Factor 46(4) (2004), pp. 587-599.
44. E.R. Boer, Behavioral Entropy as a Measure of Driving Performance, Proceeding to Driver Assessment, 2001 pp. 225-229.
45. O. Tsimhoni, H. Fuller, and M. Reed, Modeling in-vehicle display position and driver performance, Annual Meeting Industry Affiliation for Human Factors in Transportation Safety.
46. H.K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2000, pp. 551-571.
47. M.S. Chang, C.J. Messer, and A.J. Santiago, Timing traffic signal change intervals based on driver behavior, Transport. Res. Record 1027 (1985), pp. 20-30.
48. T. Haarmeier and P. Their, Detection of speed changes during pursuit eyemovement, Exp. Brain Res. 170 (2006), pp. 345-357.
49. S. Ross, Stochastic Processes, 2nd ed.,Wiley, NewYork (1996).