Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 60, Issue , 2014, Pages 16-32

  Zheng, Zuduo ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Car following; Driver behavior; Lane changing; Lane changing decision; Lane changing's impact

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING;

CAR FOLLOWING; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; IMPORTANT FEATURES; LANE CHANGING; LANE CHANGING DECISIONS; LANE CHANGING MODELS; LANE-CHANGING BEHAVIORS; RESEARCH NEEDS;

CRASHWORTHINESS;

DECISION MAKING; METHODOLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84890940695     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Ahmed K.I. Modeling Drivers' Acceleration and Lane Changing Behavior 1999, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2. Ahmed, K.I., Ben-Akiva, M.E., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Mishalani, R.G., 1996. Models of freeway lane changing and gap acceptance behavior. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation, pp. 501-515.
3. Ahn, S., Cassidy, M., 2007. Freeway traffic oscillations and vehicle lane-change maneuvers. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Amsterdam, pp. 691-710.
4. Alexiadis V., Colyar J., Halkias J., Hranac R., McHale G. The next generation simulation program. ITE Journal 2004, 74(8):22-26.
5. Barlović, R., 2003. Traffic Jams-Cluster Formation in Low-Dimensional Cellular Automata Models for Highway and City Traffic. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Standort Duisburg.
6. Barlović R., Santen L., Schadschneider A., Schreckenberg M. Metastable states in cellular automata for traffic flow. European Physical Journal B 1998, 5(3):793-800.
7. Ben-Akiva, M.E., Choudhury, C., Toledo, T., 2006. Lane changing models. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium of Transport Simulation, Laussanne, Switzerland.
8. Bertini R.L., Leal M.T. Empirical study of traffic features at a freeway lane drop. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2005, 131(6):397-407.
9. Brackstone M., McDonald M. Car-following: a historical review. Transportation Research Part F 1999, 2(4):181-196.
10. Brackstone, M., McDonald, M., Wu, J., 1998. Lane changing on the motorway: factors affecting its occurrence, and their implications. In: 9th International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control, London, UK.
11. Brackstone M., Sultan B., McDonald M. Motorway driver behaviour: studies on car following. Transportation Research Part F 2002, 5(1):31-46.
12. Casella G., Berger R.L. Statistical Inference 2001, Cengage Learning. second ed.
13. Cassidy M., Bertini R. Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B 1999, 33(1):25-42.
14. Cassidy M., Rudjanakanoknad J. Increasing the capacity of an isolated merge by metering its on-ramp. Transportation Research Part B 2005, 39(10):896-913.
15. Cassidy M., Jang K., Daganzo C. The smoothing effect of carpool lanes on freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part A 2010, 44(2):65-75.
16. Ceder A., May A.D. Further evaluation of single-and two-regime traffic flow models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1976, 1-30.
17. Chandler R.E., Herman R., Montroll E.W. Traffic dynamics: studies in car following. Operations Research 1958, 6(2):165-184.
18. Chen, C., Varaiya, P., Kwon, J., 2005. An empirical assessment of traffic operations. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, pp. 19-21.
19. Chowdhury D., Santen L., Schadschneider A. Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems. Physics Reports 2000, 329(4-6):199-329.
20. Daganzo C.F. A continuum theory of traffic dynamics for freeways with special lanes. Transportation Research Part B 1997, 31(2):83-102.
21. Daganzo C.F. A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow part I: long homogeneous freeway sections. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36(2):131-158.
22. Daganzo C.F. A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. Part II: merges and the onset of congestion. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36(2):159-169.
23. Daganzo C.F. In traffic flow, cellular automata=kinematic waves. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 40(5):396-403.
24. Daganzo C.F. In traffic flow, cellular automata = kinematic waves. Transportation Research Part B 2006, 4(5):396-403.
25. Daganzo C., Cassidy M. Effects of high occupancy vehicle lanes on freeway congestion. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(10):861-872.
26. Daganzo C.F., Lin W., Del Castillo J. A simple physical principle for the simulation of freeways with special lanes and priority vehicles. Transportation Research Part B 1997, 31(2):105-125.
27. Das, S., Bowles, B.A., Houghland, C.R., Hunn, S.J., Zhang, Y., 1999. Microscopic simulations of freeway traffic flow. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Simulation Symposium IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA.
28. Duret A., Ahn S., Buisson C. Passing rates to measure relaxation and impact of lane-changing in queue. Computer Aided Engineering and Infrastructure Engineering 2011, 26(4):285-297.
29. Edie, L., 1963. Discussion on traffic stream measurements and definitions. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow, pp. 139-154.
30. Fukui M., Ishibashi Y. Traffic flow in 1D cellular automaton model including cars moving with high speed. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 1996, 65(6):1868-1870.
31. Gan, Q., Jin, W.L., 2013. Validation of a macroscopic lane-changing model. In: Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting. No. 13-2866.
32. Gipps P.G. A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research Part B 1981, 15(2):105-111.
33. Gipps P.G. A model for the structure of lane-changing decisions. Transportation Research Part B 1986, 20(5):403-414.
34. Gundaliya, P., Tom, V., Dhingra, S., 2004. Heterogeneous traffic flow modelling using cellular automata for an arterial. In: Proceedings of the Sixth InternationalWorkshop onTransportation Planning andImplementation Methodologies for Developing Countries (TPMDC04), Transportation Systems Engineering, IIT Bombay.
35. Hamdar S.H. Modeling Driver Behavior as a Stochastic Hazard-based Risk-Taking Process 2009, Northwestern University.
36. Helbing D. Traffic flow. Encyclopedia of Nonlinear Science 2005, Routledge, New York. A. Scott (Ed.).
37. Hidas P. Modelling lane changing and merging in microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Research Part C 2002, 10(5-6):351-371.
38. Hidas P. Modelling vehicle interactions in microscopic simulation of merging and weaving. Transportation Research Part C 2005, 13(1):37-62.
39. Hoogendoorn S.P., Bovy P.H.L. State-of-the-art of vehicular traffic flow modeling. Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 2001, 215(4):283-304.
40. Hunt J.G., Lyons G.D. Modelling dual carriageway lane changing using neural networks. Transportation Research Part C 1994, 2(4):231-245.
41. Jin W.L. A kinematic wave theory of lane-changing traffic flow. Transportation Research Part B 2010, 44(8-9):1001-1021.
42. Jin, W.L., 2012. Private Communication.
43. Jin W.L. A multi-commodity Lighthill-Whitham-Richards model of lane-changing traffic flow. Transportation Research Part B 2013, 57:361-377.
44. Kerner B., Rehborn H. Experimental features and characteristics of traffic jams. Physical Review E 1996, 53(2):1297-1300.
45. Kesting A., Treiber M., Helbing D. General lane-changing model MOBIL for car-following models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2007, 1999:86-94.
46. Kita H. A merging-giveway interaction model of cars in a merging section: a game theoretic analysis. Transportation Research Part A 1999, 33(3-4):305-312.
47. Kita H., Tanimoto K., Fukuyama K. A game theoretic analysis of merging-giveway interaction: a joint estimation model. Transportation and Traffic Theory in the 21st Century 2002, 503-518. Pergamon, Oxford. M.A.P. Taylor (Ed.).
48. Knospe W., Santen L., Schadschneider A., Schreckenberg M. An empirical test for cellular automaton models of traffic flow. Physical Review E 2004, 70(1):016115.
49. Laval, J.A., Daganzo, C.F., 2003. A hybrid model of traffic flow: impacts of roadway geometry on capacity. TRB 2003 Annual Meeting CD-ROM.
50. Laval J.A., Daganzo C.F. Lane-changing in traffic streams. Transportation Research Part B 2006, 40(3):251-264.
51. Laval J.A., Leclercq L. Microscopic modeling of the relaxation phenomenon using a macroscopic lane-changing model. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(6):511-522.
52. Leclercq L., Chiabaut N., Laval J.A., Buisson C. Relaxation phenomenon after changing lanes: an experimental validation with the NGSIM dataset. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2007, 1999:79-85.
53. Lighthill M., Whitham G. On kinematic waves: II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1955, 229(1178):317-345.
54. Ma T., Ahn S. Comparisons of speed-spacing relations under general car following versus lane-changing. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2008, 2088:138-147.
55. Maerivoet S., Moor B.D. Cellular automata models of road traffic. Physics Reports 2005, 419(1):1-64.
56. Mallikarjuna C., Rao K.R. Traffic flow modelling on highways using cellular automata: a review. Proceedings of International Conference on Structural and Transportation Engineering (START05) 2005, 912-919. Elite Publishing House, New Delhi. J. Bandyopadhyay, B. Maitra (Eds.).
57. Mattes S. The Lane Change Task as a Tool for Driver Distraction Evaluation 2003, DaimlerChrysler AG Research & Technology.
58. Mauch M., Cassidy M.J. Freeway traffic oscillations: observations and predictions. Proceedings of the15th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory 2002, 653-674. Pergamon-Elsevier, Oxford, UK. M.A.P. Taylor (Ed.).
59. McDonald, M., Wu, J., Brackstone, M., 1997. Development of a fuzzy logic based microscopic motorway simulation mode. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Boston, USA.
60. Menendez M., Daganzo C. Effects of HOV lanes on freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B 2007, 41(8):809-822.
61. Michalopoulos P.G., Beskos D.E., Yamauchi Y. Multilane traffic dynamics: some macroscopic considerations. Transportation Research Part B 1984, 18(4-5):377-395.
62. Moridpour S., Rose G., Sarvi M. Modelling the heavy vehicle drivers' lane changing decision under heavy traffic conditions. Journal of Road and Transport Research 2009, 18(4):49-57.
63. Moridpour S., Sarvi M., Rose G. Lane changing models: a critical review. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research 2010, 2(3):157-173.
64. Munjal P.K., Pipes L.A. Propagation of on-ramp density perturbations on unidirectional two- and three-lane freeways. Transportation Research Part B 1971, 5(4):241-255.
65. Munjal P.K., Hsu Y., Lawrence R.L. Analysis and validation of lane-drop effects on multi-lane freeways. Transportation Research Part B 1971, 5(4):257-266.
66. Munoz, J.C., Daganzo, C.F., 2002. Moving bottlenecks: a theory grounded on experimental observation. In: Taylor, M.A.P. (Ed.), 15th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Pergamon-Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 441-462.
67. Nagatani T. Self-organization and phase transition in traffic-flow model of a two-lane roadway. Journal of Physics A 1993, 26(17):781-787.
68. Nagatani T. Traffic jam and shock formation in stochastic traffic-flow model of a two-lane roadway. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 1994, 63(1):52-58.
69. Nagel, K., 1995. High-speedmicrosimulations of Traffic Flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität zu Köln.
70. Nagel K. Particle hopping models and traffic flow theory. Physical Review E 1996, 53(5):4655-4672.
71. Nagel K., Paczuski M. Emergent traffic jams. Physical Review E 1995, 51(4):2909-2918.
72. Nagel K., Schreckenberg M. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. Journal of Physics I France 1992, 2(12):2221-2229.
73. Nagel K., Wolf D.E., Wagner P., Simon P. Two-lane traffic rules for cellular automata: a systematic approach. Physical Review E 1998, 58(2):1425-1437.
74. Nagel K., Wagner P., Woesler R. Still flowing: approaches to traffic flow and traffic jam modeling. Operations Research 2003, 51(5):681-710.
75. Neumann J. The general and logical theory of automata. Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior 1948, 1-41. Wiley, New York. L.A. Jeffress (Ed.).
76. Newell G.F. A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36(3):195-205.
77. Olstam J.J., Tapani A. Comparison of Car-following Models 2004, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute.
78. Pande A., Abdel-Aty M. Assessment of freeway traffic parameters leading to lane-change related collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2006, 38(5):936-948.
79. Pentland A., Liu A. Modeling and prediction of human behavior. Neural Computation 1999, 11:229-242.
80. Prevedouros, P.D., Wang, Y., 1999. Simulation of large freewayand arterial network with CORSIM, INTEGRATION, and WATSim. In: Proceedings of 78th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
81. Richards P.I. Shock waves on the highway. Operations Research 1956, 4(1):42-51.
82. Rickert M., Nagel K., Schreckenberg M., Latour A. Two lane traffic simulations using cellular automata. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 1996, 231(4):534-550.
83. Ross T.J. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications 2010, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
84. Schadschneider A. Statistical physics of traffic flow. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2000, 285(1-2):101-120.
85. Schadschneider A. Traffic flow: a statistical physics point of view. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2002, 313(1-2):153-187.
86. Schreckenberg M., Barlović R., Knospe W., Klüpfel H. Statistical physics of cellular automata models for traffic flow. Computational Statistical Physics 2001, 113-126. Springer, Berlin. K.H. Hoffmann, M. Schreiber (Eds.).
87. Sen, B., Smith, J.D., Najm, W.G., 2003. Analysis of Lane Change Crashes. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. Cambridge, MA. DOT-VNTSC-NHTSA-02-03.
88. Sheu J.B., Ritchie S.G. Stochastic modeling and real-time prediction of vehicular lane-changing behavior. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35(7):695-716.
89. Singh K., Li B. Estimation of traffic densities for multilane roadways using a Markov model approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2012, 59(11):4369-4376.
90. Smith, S.A., 1985. Freeway Data Collection for Studying Vehicle Interactions. Federal Highway Administration; Available through the National Technical Information Service.
91. Sun, D.J., 2009. A Lane-changing Model for Urban Arterial Streets. University of Florida.
92. Sun D.J., Elefteriadou L. Lane-changing behavior on urban streets: a focus group-based study. Applied Ergonomics 2011, 42(5):682-691.
93. Sun D.J., Elefteriadou L. Lane-changing behavior on urban streets: an "in-vehicle" field experiment-based study. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2012, 27(7):525-542.
94. Sun, J., Zheng, Z., 2013. Field Observations and Private Communications during Dr. Zheng's visit to Tongji University.
95. Takayasu M., Takayasu H. 1/f noise in a traffic model. Fractals 1993, 1(4):860-866.
96. Toledo T. Integrated Driving Behavior Modeling 2003, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
97. Toledo T. Driving behaviors: models and research directions. Transport Reviews 2007, 27(1):65-84.
98. Toledo T., Katz R. State-dependence in lane changing models. Transportation Research Record 2009, 2124:81-88.
99. Toledo T., Koutsopoulos H.N., Ben-Akiva M.E. Modeling integrated lane-changing behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2003, 1857:30-38.
100. Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual: Special Report 209 1994, National Research Council, Washington, DC. third ed.
101. TSS, Transport Simulation Systems, 2002. AIMSUN Version 4.1 User Manual.
102. Wagner P., Nagel K., Wolf D.E. Realistic multi-lane traffic rules for cellular automata. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 1997, 234(3-4):687-698.
103. Wang C., Coifman B. The effect of lane-change maneuvers on a simplified car-following theory. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2008, 9(3):523-535.
104. Winsum W., Waard D., Brookhuis K.A. Lane change manoeuvres and safety margins. Transportation Research Part F 1999, 2(3):139-149.
105. Wolfram S. Statistical mechanics of cellular automata. Reviews of Modern Physics 1983, 55(3):601-644.
106. Worrall R.D., Bullen A.G., Gur Y. An elementary stochastic model of lane-changing on a multilane highway. Highway Research Record 1970, 308:1-12.
107. Wu J., Brackstone M., McDonald M. Fuzzy sets and systems for a motorway microscopic simulation model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Special Issue on Fuzzy Sets in Traffic and Transport Systems 2000, 116(1):65-76.
108. Yang Q., Koutsopoulos H.N. A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems. Transportation Research Part C 1996, 4(3):113-129.
109. Yeldana, Ö., Colornib, A., Alessandro, L., Rodarod, E., 2012. A Stochastic Continuous Cellular Automata Traffic Flow Model with a Multi-agent Fuzzy System. Euro Working Group on Transportation EWGT2012. Paris, France.
110. Zheng Z., Ahn S., Monsere C.M. Impact of traffic oscillations on freeway crash occurrences. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2010, 42(2):626-636.
111. Zheng Z., Ahn S., Chen D., Laval J. Freeway traffic oscillations: microscopic analysis of formations and propagations using Wavelet Transform. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(9):1378-1388.
112. Zheng Z., Ahn S., Chen D., Laval J. The effects of lane-changing on the immediate follower: anticipation, relaxation, and change in driver characteristics. Transportation Research Part C 2013, 26(0):367-379.