Driver behavior modeling

Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles

Volumn 1-2, Issue , 2012, Pages 537-558

  Hamdar, Samer ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; VEHICLES;

ACCELERATION MODELS; CAR FOLLOWING MODELS; COGNITIVE DIMENSIONS; DRIVER BEHAVIOR MODELING; LANE CHANGING MODELS; LANE-DEPARTURE-WARNING SYSTEMS; MICROSCOPIC TRAFFIC MODEL; OPERATIONAL ASPECTS;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 84908578730     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-085-4_20     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Ahmed KI (1999) Modeling driver's acceleration and lane changing behaviors. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
2. Bando M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, Shibata A, Sugiyama Y (1995) Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys Rev E 51:1035-1042.
3. Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
4. Boer ER (1999) Car following from the driver's perspective. Transportation Research Board, Part F 2(4):201-206.
5. Brackston M, McDonald M (1999) Car-following: a historical review. Transportation Research, Part F 2(4):181-196.
6. Chandler R, Herman R, Montroll W (1958) Traffic dynamics: studies in car-following. Oper Res 6:165-184.
7. Edie LC (1961) Car-following and steady-state theory for non-congested traffic. Oper Res 9:66-76.
8. FHWA (2004) NGSIM Task E.1-1: core algorithms assessment, final report, Cambridge Systematic, Inc., Massachusetts.
9. Gazis DC, Herman R, Potts R (1959) Car-following theory of steady state traffic flow. Oper Res 7:499-505.
10. Gazis D, Herman R, Rothery R (1961)Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Oper Res 9:545-567.
11. Gipps PG (1981) A behavioral car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research 15B:101-115.
12. Gipps PG (1986) A model for the structure of lane changing decisions. Transportation Research 20B:403-414.
13. Hamdar SH, Mahmassani HS (2008) From existing accident-free car-following models to colliding vehicles: exploration and assessment, National Research Council (US). Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC, 87th January 2008. Preprint CD-ROM.
14. Hastie R, Dawes RM (2001) Rational choice in an uncertain world. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
15. Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 406:487-491.
16. Hidas P (2002) Modeling lane-changing and merging in microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Research, Part C 10(2):351-371.
17. Kesting A, Treiber M, Helbing D (2007) MOBIL: general lane changingmodel for car-followingmodels. Transportation Research Record 1999/2007:86-94.
18. Krauss S, Wagner P (1997) Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow. Phys Rev E 55(5):5597-5602.
19. Krauss S, Wagner P, Gawron C (1996) Continuous limit of Nagel-Shreckenberg model. Phys Rev E 54(4):3707-3712.
20. Nagel K, ShreckenbergM(1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J Phys I (France) 2:2221-2229.
21. National Highway Traffic Safety (1998) Aggressive driving; help get the world out, US. DOT. http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS3277. Accessed December, 2004.
22. Newel G (1961) Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car-following. Oper Res 9:209-229.
23. Ranney TA (1999) Psychological factors that influence car-following and car-following model development. Transportation Research, Part F 2(4):213-219.
24. Rothery RW (1999) Traffic flow theory: A state-ofthe-Art report-revised monograph on traffic flow theory. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
25. Schmidt LJ, Warner B (2002) Panic: origins, insight, and treatment. North Atlantic Books, California.
26. Schultz DP (1964) Panic behavior, discussion and readings. Random House, New York.
27. Tadaki S, Nishinari K, Kikuchi M, Sugiyama Y, Yukawa S (2002) Analysis of congested flow at the upper stream of a tunnel. Physica A 315:156-162.
28. Tilch B, Helbing D (1998) Generalized force model of traffic dynamics. Phys Rev E 58:133.
29. Treiber M, Hennecke K, Helbing D (2000) Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys Rev E 2(2):1805-1824.
30. Treiber M, Kesting A, Helbing D (2006) Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models. Physica A 360:71-88.
31. Wallsten TS, Pleskac TJ, Lejuez CW (2005) Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risktaking task. Psychol Rev 112(4):862-880.
32. Wiedemann R, Reiter U, (1992) Microscopic traffic simulation, the simulation system mission. Project ICARUS (V1052) Final Report, CEC, Brussels.