A safety-based approaching behavioural model with various driving characteristics

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1202-1214

  Wang, Wuhong ^a   Zhang, Wei ^a   Guo, Hongwei ^a   Bubb, Heiner ^b   Ikeuchi, Katsushi ^c  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Acceleration; Car following; Deceleration; Driver assistance; Driving behaviour; Safety spacing

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; DECELERATION; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; VEHICLES;

ACCELERATION BEHAVIOURS; CAR FOLLOWING; DRIVER ASSISTANCE; DRIVING BEHAVIOUR; DRIVING CHARACTERISTICS; SAFETY SPACINGS; SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC FLOW CHARACTERISTICS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ACCELERATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; NUMERICAL MODEL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 80052777070     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ahmed, K.I., 1999. Modeling Drivers' Acceleration and Lane Changing Behaviour, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2. Alvarez L., Horowitz R., Toy C.V. Multi-destination traffic flow control in automated highway systems. Transportation Research Part C 2003, 11:1-28.
3. Aycin M.F., Benekohal R.F. Stability and performance of car-following models in congested traffic. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2001, 127(1):2-12.
4. Bham G.H., Benekohal R.F. A high fidelity traffic simulation model based on cellular automata and car-following concepts. Transportation Research Part C 2004, 12(1):1-32.
5. Bonsall P., Liu R.H., Young W. Modelling safety-related driving behaviour-impact of parameter values. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39:425-444.
6. Brackstone M., McDonald M. Car-following: a historical review. Transportation Research Part F 1999, 2:181-196.
7. Brackstone M., Waterson B., McDonald M. Determinants of following headway in congested traffic. Transportation Research Part F 2009, 12:131-142.
8. Brookhuis K., Waard D.D., Mulder B. Measuring driving performance by car-following in traffic. Ergonomics 1994, 37:427-434.
9. Bubb, H., 2010. Driver behaviour and assistance. In: Wang, W.H., Bengler, K. (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Sino-German Workshop on Driver Assistance and Traffic Safety. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, vol. 19, no. S2, pp. 1-15.
10. Dawis S.M. A molecular basis for Weber's law. Visual Neuroscience 1991, 7:285-320.
11. Dijker T., Bovy P.H.L., Vermijs R.G.M. Car-following under congested conditions: empirical findings. Transportation Research Record 1998, 1644:20-27.
12. Dowling R., Skabardonis A., Halkias J., McHale G., Zammit G. Guidelines for calibration of microsimulation models. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1876:1-9.
13. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 1998. Traffic Software Integrated System Version 4.2 User's Guide.
14. Gunay B. A methodology on the automatic recognition of poor lane keeping. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2008, 42(2):129-150.
15. Hoedemaeker M., Brookhuis K.A. Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC). Transportation Research Part F 1998, 1:95-106.
16. Karris S.T. Introduction to Simulink with Engineering Applications 2008, Orchard Publications, US. second ed.
17. Kesting A., Treiber M., Schonhof M., Helbing D. Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transportation Research Part C 2008, 16(6):668-683.
18. Koppa R.J. Human factors. Monograph on Traffic Flow Theory 1996, 3.1-3.32. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC. N. Gartner, C.J. Messer, A.K. Rathi (Eds.).
19. Li P.Y., Shrivastava A. Traffic flow stability induced by constant time headway policy for adaptive cruise control vehicles. Transportation Research Part C 2002, 10(4):275-301.
20. Michaels, R.M., 1963. Perceptual factors in car following. In: The Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow, Paris, pp. 44-59.
21. Newell G.F. A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36:195-205.
22. NGSIM, 2002, Next Generation Simulation Program, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). http://www.ngsim.fhwa.dot.gov.
23. NGSIM COMMUNITY, 2005. NGSIM I-80 Data Analysis, Summary Reports, Federal Highway Administration. http://ngsim-community.org/.
24. Owen, L.E., Zhang, Y., Rao, L., McHale, G., 2000. Traffic flow simulation using CORSIM. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, vol. 2. ITT Industries.
25. Ranney T.A. Models of driving behaviour: a review of their evolution. Accidents analysis and prevention 1994, 26:733-750.
26. Ranney T.A. Psychological factors that influence car following and car-following model development. Transportation Research Part F 1999, 2:213-219.
27. Rumar K. The role of perceptual and cognitive failures in observed behaviour. Human Behaviour and Traffic Safety 1998, 151-165. Plenum Press, Berlin, New York. L. Evans, R.C. Schwing (Eds.).
28. Sukthankar R. Situation awareness in tactical driving: the role of simulation tools. Transactions Society for Computer Simulation 1997, 14:214-221.
29. Summala H. Accident risk and driver behaviour. Safety Science 1996, 22:103-117.
30. Thiemann C., Treiber M., Kesting A. Estimating acceleration and lane-changing dynamics from next generation simulation trajectory data. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2088:90-101.
31. Transportation Research Board, 2000. Highway Capacity Manual, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
32. Wang W.H. Driving Behaviour Theory and Method in Road Transport System 2001, Science Press, Beijing, pp. 70-325.
33. Wang W.H. A digital driving system for smart vehicle. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2002, 17(5):81-83.
34. Wang W.H. Measurement of dangerous traffic conditions through driving dependability analysis. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research 2010, 69(4):254-258.
35. Wang, W.H., Zhang, W., Li, D.H., Hirahara, K., Ikeuchi, K., 2004. Improved action point model in traffic flow based on driver's cognitive mechanism. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV04), Parma, Italy, pp. 447-452.
36. Wang W.H., Jiang X.B., Xia S.C., Cao Q. Incident tree model and incident tree analysis method for quantified risk assessment: an in-depth accident study in traffic operation. Safety Science 2010, 48(10):1248-1262.
37. Wang W.H., Cao Q., Ikeuchi K., Bubb H. Reliability and safety analysis methodology for identification of drivers' erroneous actions. International Journal of Automotive Technology 2010, 11(6):873-881.
38. Wang W.H., Hou F.G., Tan H., Bubb H. A framework for function allocation in intelligent driver interface design for comfort and safety. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 2010, 3(5):531-541.
39. Winsum W. The human element in car following models. Transportation Research Part F 1999, 2:207-211.
40. Winsum W., Brouwer W. Time headway in car following and operational performance during unexpected braking. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1997, 84:1247-1257.
41. Winsum W., Heino A. Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time to collision information in braking. Ergonomics 1996, 39:579-592.
42. Xin W., Hourdos J., Michalopoulos P. The less-than-perfect driver: a model of collision inclusive car-following behaviour. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2088:126-137.
43. Zheng P.J., McDonald M. Manual vs. adaptive cruise control: can driver's expectation be matched?. Transportation Research Part C 2005, 13(5-6):570-576.