Is car following the real question - are equations the answer?

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 197-199

  Hancock, P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345983551     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00006-1     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Brackstone, M., & McDonald, M. (2000). Car following: a historical review. Transportation Research: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour: Part F 1, 2, 181-196.
2. Ceder A., May A.D. Further evaluation of single and two regime traffic flow models. Transportation Research Record. 567:1976;1-30.
3. Flach, J.M. (1999). Beyond error: The language of coordination and stability. In P.A. Hancock, Human performance and ergonomics (pp. 109-128). San Diego: Academic Press.
4. Gibson J.J., Crooks L.E. A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. American Journal of Psychology. 51:1938;453-471.
5. Groeger, J.A. & Brady, S.J. (1999). Tau dot or not? Paper given at the Eighth International Conference on Vision in Vehicles, Boston, MA, August.
6. Hancock, P.A. (1993). Evaluating in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems for IVHS. In E.J. Haug, Concurrent engineering: tools and technologies for mechanical system design (pp. 947-958), Berlin: Springer.
7. Hancock P.A., Scallen S.F. The driving question. Transportation Human Factors. 1:1999;47-55.
8. Schiller, W., & Donath, M. (1997). The virtual bumper: A control based collision avoidance system for highway vehicles. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN/DOT) Report No. 1998-30, St. Paul, MN.
9. Simon H.A. Sciences of the artificial. 1969;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.