Assessment of movement quality in robot- Assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: A review

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Nordin, Nurdiana ^a,b   Xie, Sheng Quan ^a,c   Wünsche, Burkhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA   (Malaysia)

^c HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Motion analysis; Rehabilitation robotics; Robot kinematics; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARM MOVEMENT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION; REVIEW; ROBOT ASSISTED REHABILITATION; ROBOTICS; STROKE PATIENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BIOMECHANICS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STROKE;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; ROBOTICS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84907448686     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-137     Document Type: Review

References (131)

1. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N, J Neurosci 2002 22 18 8297 304 12223584
2. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Dobkin BH, Lancet Neurol 2004 3 9 528 36 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00851-8 15324721
3. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI, J Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 2 111 21
4. Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy: recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation? Kitago T, Liang J, Huang VS, Hayes S, Simon P, Tenteromano L, Lazar RM, Marshall RS, Mazzoni P, Lennihan L, Krakauer JW, J Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013 27 2 99 109 10.1177/1545968312452631
5. Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. Sivan M, O'Connor RJ, Makower S, Bhakta B, Levesley M, J Rehabil Med 2011 43 3 181 189 10.2340/16501977-0674 21305232
6. Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediated stroke therapy. Amirabdollahian F, Loureiro R, Gradwell E, Collin C, Harwin W, Johnson G, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007 4 c 4 17309791
7. Effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation (FES)-robot assisted wrist training on persons after stroke. Hu XL, Tong KY, Li R, Chen M, Xue JJ, Ho SK, Chen PN, Proc 2010 Annu. Int. Conf Buenos Aires: IEEE EMBS 2010 5819 5822
8. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 4 D006876 18843735
9. On "Modified constraint-induced therapy." Page and Levine. Phys Ther 2007; 87:872 878. Sullivan KJ, Phys Ther 2007 87 11 1560 17974578
10. Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation. Zollo L, Rossini L, Bravi M, Magrone G, Sterzi S, Guglielmelli E, Med Biol Eng Comput 2011 49 10 1131 1144 10.1007/s11517-011-0808-1 21792622
11. Bilateral assessment of functional tasks for robot-assisted therapy applications. Johnson MJ, Wang S, Bai P, Strachota E, Tchekanov G, Melbye J, McGuire J, Med Biol Eng Comput 2011 49 10 1157 1171 10.1007/s11517-011-0817-0 21881901
12. Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rykman-Berland A, Ferraro M, Galgano M, Hogan N, Krebs HI, J Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 3 305 310 10.1177/1545968307311102
13. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Carrozza MC, Dario P, Minuco G, J Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 1 50 63
14. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006 3 12 10.1186/1743-0003-3-12 16790067
15. Unilateral versus bilateral robot-assisted rehabilitation on arm-trunk control and functions post stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Wu C-Y, Yang C-L, Lin K-C, Wu L-L, Chen M-d, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013 10 1 35 10.1186/1743-0003-10-35 23587106
16. Kinematic data analysis for post-stroke patients following bilateral versus unilateral rehabilitation with an upper limb wearable robotic system. Kim H, Miller LM, Fedulow I, Simkins M, Abrams GM, Byl N, Rosen J, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2013 21 2 153 64 22855233
17. Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL, Brain J Neurol 2007 130 Pt 8 2146 2158
18. Assessment of upper-limb sensorimotor function of subacute stroke patients using visually guided reaching. Coderre AM, Zeid AA, Dukelow SP, Demmer MJ, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Bretzke H, Herter TM, Glasgow JI, Norman KE, Bagg SD, Scott SH, J Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 6 528 541 10.1177/1545968309356091
19. Robotic identification of kinesthetic deficits after stroke. Semrau JA, Herter TM, Scott SH, Dukelow SP, Stroke; J Cerebral Circ 2013 44 12 3414 3421 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002058
20. The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Bagg SD, Scott SH, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012 9 72 10.1186/1743-0003-9-72 23035968
21. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 84 4 477 482 10.1053/apmr.2003.50110 12690583
22. Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? Kahn LE, Lum PS, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Rehabil Res Dev 2006 43 5 619 10.1682/JRRD.2005.03.0056 17123203
23. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, Schaefer SY, Birkenmeier RL, J Hand Therapy 2013 26 2 104 115 10.1016/j.jht.2012.06.005
24. Kinematic variables quantifying upper-extremity performance after stroke during reaching and drinking from a glass. Alt Murphy M, Willén C, Sunnerhagen KS, J Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011 25 1 71 80 10.1177/1545968310370748
25. Robotic systems that rehabilitate as well as motivate: three strategies for motivating impaired arm use. Johnson MJ, Johnson LM, Ramachandran B, Winters JM, Kosasih JB, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS Int. Conf. Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006 (BioRob) Pisa: IEEE 2006 254 259
26. Dynamic biomechanical model for assessing and monitoring robot-assisted upper-limb therapy. Abdullah HA, Tarry C, Datta R, Mittal GS, Abderrahim M, J Rehabil Res Dev 2007 44 1 43 10.1682/JRRD.2006.03.0025 17551857
27. Motor performance evaluation to improve patient's compliance during robot-aided rehabilitation. Colombo R, Pisano F, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Minuco G, Micera S, Carrozza MC, Dario P, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS Int. Conf. on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006 (BioRob) Pisa: IEEE 2006 1090 1094
28. Neuro-rehabilitation robot-assisted assessments of synergy patterns of forearm, elbow and shoulder joints in chronic stroke patients. Kung P-C, Lin C-CK, Ju M-S, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010 25 7 647 554 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.04.014
29. An assessment of robot-assisted bimanual movements on upper limb motor coordination following stroke. Lewis GN, Perreault EJ, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009 17 6 595 604 19666342
30. Changes in spatial scale in drawing and handwriting: kinematic contributions by proximal and distal joints. Lacquaniti F, Ferrigno G, Pedotti A, Soechting JF, Terzuolo C, J Neuroscience 1987 7 3 819 828
31. Coordination of arm movements in three-dimensional space Sensorimotor mapping during drawing movement. Soechting J, Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo C, J Neuroscience 1986 17 2 295 311 10.1016/0306-4522(86)90248-4
32. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 87 7 962 966 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036 16813784
33. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A, Stroke 2001 32 7 1635 1639 10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635 11441212
34. Clinical reality of measuring upper-limb ability in neurologic conditions: a systematic review. Connell LA, Tyson SF, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012 93 2 221 228 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.015 22289230
35. Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Bosecker C, Dipietro L, Krebs HI, Volpe B, J Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 1 62 69 10.1177/1545968309343214
36. Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke. Winward CE, Halligan P, Wade DT, Clin Rehabil 1999 13 1 48 55 10.1191/026921599701532126 10327097
37. Relating movement control at 9 upper extremity segments to loss of hand function in people with chronic hemiparesis. Lang CE, Beebe JA, J Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007 21 3 279 291 10.1177/1545968306296964
38. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Twitchell TE, Brain J Neurol 1951 74 4 443 480 10.1093/brain/74.4.443
39. Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke. Dipietro L, Krebs HI, Fasoli SE, Volpe BT, Stein J, Bever C, Hogan N, J Neurophysiol 2007 98 2 757 768 10.1152/jn.01295.2006 17553941
40. Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. Lo HS, Xie SQ, Med Eng Phys 2012 34 3 261 268 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.10.004 22051085
41. A systematic review of bilateral upper limb training devices for poststroke rehabilitation. van Delden aLEQ, Peper CLE, Kwakkel G, Beek PJ, Stroke Res Treat 2012 2012 17 Article ID 972069. doi:10.1155/2012/972069
42. Human motion tracking for rehabilitation: A survey. Zhou H, Hu H, Biomed Signal Process Control 2008 3 1 1 18 10.1016/j.bspc.2007.09.001
43. Sensorimotor impairments and reaching performance in subjects with poststroke hemiparesis during the first few months of recovery. Wagner JM, Lang CE, Sahrmann SA, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW, Phys Ther 2007 87 6 751 765 10.2522/ptj.20060135 17442839
44. Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular. Daly JJ, Hogan N, Perepezko EM, Krebs HI, Rogers JM, Goyal KS, Dohring ME, Fredrickson E, Nethery J, Ruff RL, J Rehabil Res Dev 2005 42 6 723 10.1682/JRRD.2005.02.0048 16680610
45. Effect of gravity on robot-assisted motor training after chronic stroke: a randomized trial. Conroy S, Dipietro L, Jones-Lush LM, Zhan M, Finley MA, Wittenberg GF, Krebs HI, Bever CT, Whitall J l, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011 92 11 1754 1761 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.016 21849168
46. Biomechanical assessment of reaching movements in post-stroke patients during a robot-aided rehabilitation. Mazzoleni S, Posteraro F, Filippi M, Forte F, Micera S, Dario P, Carrozza MC, Appl Bionics Biomech 2011 8 1 39 54
47. Effects of robot-assisted wrist therapy in chronic stroke patients: a kinematic approach. Mazzoleni S, Crecchi R, Posteraro F, Carroza MC, The Fourth IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics Rome 2012 1978 1982
48. Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in chronic and subacute stroke patients: a kinematic analysis. Mazzoleni S, Sale P, Tiboni M, Franceschini M, Carrozza MC, Posteraro F, Am J Phys Med Rehabil Assoc Acad Physiatrists 2013 92 10 Suppl 1 26 37
49. Integrating proprioceptive assessment with proprioceptive training of stroke patients. Squeri V, Zenzeri J, Morasso P, Basteris A, Proc. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robotics 2011 2011 5975500
50. Training and assessment of upper limb motor function with a robotic exoskeleton after stroke. Frisoli A, Sotgiu E, Procopio C, Bergamasco M, Chisari C, Lamola G, Rossi B, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS Int. Conf. on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Rome: IEEE 2012 1782 1787
51. Rehabilitation training and evaluation with the L-EXOS in chronic stroke. Frisoli A, Chisari C, Sotgiu E, Impact Analysis of Solutions for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, Donnelly M, Paggetti C, Nugent C, Mokhtari M, 2012 242 245
52. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole A, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 6 653 62 11321001
53. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. Burgar CG, Lum PS, Shor PC, Machiel HF, Machiel Van der Loos HF, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 6 663 673 11321002
54. Effect of robot-assisted and unassisted exercise on functional reaching in chronic hemiparesis. Kahn L, Zygman M, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, 2001 Conf. Proc. 23rd Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Istanbul: IEEE 2001 1344 1347
55. Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004 12 2 186 194 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.827225 15218933
56. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. Sanchez R, Liu J, Rao S, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2006 14 3 378 389 17009498
57. Development and evaluation of a gravity compensated training environment for robotic rehabilitation of post-stroke reaching. Beer RF, Naujokas C, Bachrach B, Mayhew D, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS Int. Conf. on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Scottsdale, AZ: IEEE 2008 205 210
58. Effect of a gravity-compensating orthosis on reaching after stroke evaluation of the Therapy Assistant WREX. Iwamuro BT, Cruz EG, Connelly LL, Fischer HC, Kamper DG, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 89 11 2121 2128 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.04.022 18996241
59. Robot therapy for stroke survivors: proprioceptive training and regulation of assistance. Sanguineti V, Casadio M, Vergaro E, Squeri V, Giannoni P, Morasso PG, Stud Health Technol Inform 2009 145 126 142 19592791
60. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic-stroke. Chang J-J, Tung W-L, Wu W-L, Huang M-H, Su F-C, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 88 10 1332 1338 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.016 17908578
61. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Carrozza M, Dario P, Minuco G, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005 13 3 311 324 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848352 16200755
62. Tracking motor improvement at the subtask level during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Panarese A, Colombo R, Sterpi I, Pisano F, Micera S, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012 26 7 822 833 10.1177/1545968311431966 22374174
63. Self-adaptive robot training of stroke survivors for continuous tracking movements. Vergaro E, Casadio M, Squeri V, Giannoni P, Morasso P, Sanguineti V, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010 7 13 10.1186/1743-0003-7-13 20230610
64. Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Glasgow JI, Bagg SD, Norman KE, Scott SH, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 2 178 187 10.1177/1545968309345267 19794134
65. Bilateral robot therapy based on haptics and reinforcement learning Feasibility study of a new concept for treatment of patients after stroke. Squeri V, Casadio M, Vergaro E, Giannoni P, Morasso P, Sanguineti V, J Rehabil Med 2009 41 12 961 965 10.2340/16501977-0400 19841824
66. Passive robotic movement therapy of the spastic hemiparetic arm with REHAROB: report of the first clinical test and the follow-up system improvement. Toth A, Fazekas G, Arz G, 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics Chicago, IL 2005 127 130
67. Effects of arm training with the robotic device ARMin I in chronic stroke: three single cases. Nef T, Quinter G, Müller R, Riener R, Neuro-degenerative Diseases 2009 6 5-6 240 251 10.1159/000262444 19940461
68. Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy for patients with spastic hemiparesis: a preliminary study. Fazekas G, Horvath M, Troznai T, Toth A, J Rehabil Med 2007 39 7 580 582 10.2340/16501977-0087 17724559
69. Armin II-7 DoF rehabilitation robot: mechanics and kinematics. Mihelj M, Nef T, Riener R, Proc 2007 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and, Automation Rome: IEEE 2007 4120 4125
70. NEUROExos: A powered elbow exoskeleton for physical rehabilitation. Vitiello N, Lenzi T, Roccella S, De Rossi SMM, Cattin E, Giovacchini F, Vecchi F, Carrozza MC, IEEE Trans Robot 2013 29 1 220 235
71. Compensation for the intrinsic dynamics of the Inmotion2 robot. Nguyen HB, Lum PS, J Neurosci Methods 2013 214 1 15 20 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.01.001 23313756
72. Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active-assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Kenney DE, Van der Loos H F M, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999 46 6 652 662 10.1109/10.764942 10356872
73. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA, Exp Brain Res 1991 86 1 199 208 1756790
74. Motor disorder in Huntington's disease begins as a dysfunction in error feedback control. Smith MA, Brandt J, Shadmehr R, Nature 2000 403 6769 544 549 10.1038/35000576 10676962
75. Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. Smith M, Shadmehr R, J Neurophysiol 2005 93 5 2809 2821 10.1152/jn.00943.2004 15625094
76. Assessing the motor status score: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Ferraro M, Demaio JH, Krol J, Trudell C, Rannekleiv K, Edelstein L, Christos P, Aisen M, England J, Fasoli S, Krebs H, Hogan N, Volpe BT, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002 16 3 283 289 10.1177/154596802401105216 12234090
77. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Cirstea MC, Levin MF, Brain J Neurol 2000 123 Pt 5 940 953
78. Results of clinicians using a therapeutic robotic system in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. Abdullah HA, Tarry C, Lambert C, Barreca S, Allen BO, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 1 50 10.1186/1743-0003-8-50 21871095
79. Quantitative evaluation of motor functional recovery process in chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted wrist training. Hu XL, Tong KY, Song R, Zheng XJ, Lui KH, Leung WWF, Ng S, Au-Yeung SSY, J Electromyograph Kinesiol 2009 19 4 639 650 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.04.002
80. On reaching. Georgopoulos A, Annu Rev Neurosci 1986 9 1 147 170 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.001051 ] 10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.001051 3518585
81. Multi-joint limbs permit a flexible response to unpredictable events. Robertson EM, Miall RC, Exp Brain Res 1997 117 1 148 152 10.1007/s002210050208 9386013
82. What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke? Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 23 4 313 319 10.1177/1545968308328727 19118128
83. Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Levin MF, Michaelsen SM, Cirstea CM, Roby-Brami A, Exp Brain Res Experimentelle Hirnforschung Expérimentation cérébrale 2002 143 2 171 180 10.1007/s00221-001-0976-6
84. Emergence of motor synergy in vertical reaching task via tacit learning. Hayashibe M, Shimoda S, Proc 2013 35th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBC Osaka: IEEE 2013 4985 4988
85. Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in Hemiparetic patients. Michaelsen SM, Luta A, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF, Stroke 2001 32 8 1875 1883 10.1161/01.STR.32.8.1875 11486120
86. Brunnström S, Movement therapy in hemiplegia- a neurophysiological approach New York: Medical Dept., Harper & Row 1970
87. Constraining upper limb synergies of hemiparetic patients using a robotic exoskeleton in the perspective of neuro-rehabilitation. Crocher V, Sahbani A, Robertson J, Roby-Brami A, Morel G, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012 20 3 247 257 22481836
88. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 7 952 959 10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 12098155
89. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: a follow-up study. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Loos MVD, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Yap R, J Rehabil Res Dev 2006 43 5 631 10.1682/JRRD.2005.02.0044 17123204
90. Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 4 321 329 18326888
91. Robotic unilateral and bilateral upper-limb movement training for stroke survivors afflicted by chronic hemiparesis. Simkins M, Kim H, Abrams G, Byl N, Rosen J, IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot [proceedings] 2013 2013 1 6
92. Sensitivity of smoothness measures to movement duration, amplitude, and arrests. Hogan N, Sternad D, J Motor Behav 2009 41 6 529 534 10.3200/35-09-004-RC
93. A robust and sensitive metric for quantifying movement smoothness. S Balasubramanian EB, Melendez-Calderon A, Burdet E, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012 59 8 2126 2136 22180502
94. Woodworth RS, The Accuracy of voluntary movement New York: Macmillan 1901
95. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT, IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998 6 1 75 87 10.1109/86.662623 9535526
96. Robot-measured performance metrics in stroke rehabilitation. Balasubramanian S, Wei R, Herman R, He J, 2009 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering Tempe, AZ: IEEE 2009 1 6
97. Assessments in Australian stroke rehabilitation units: a systematic review of the post-stroke validity of the most frequently used. Kitsos G, Harris D, Pollack M, Hubbard IJ, Disabil Rehabil 2011 33 25-26 2620 2632 10.3109/09638288.2011.575526 21554012
98. The rehabilitation gaming system: a virtual reality based system for the evaluation and rehabilitation of motor deficits. Cameirao MS, Zimmerli L, Oller ED, Verschure PFMJ, Badia S B i, Proc. Virtual Rehabilitation Venice: IEEE 2007 29 33
99. Dual camera motion capture for serious games in stroke rehabilitation. Evett L, Burton A, Battersby S, Brown D, Sherkat N, Ford G, Liu H, Standen P, 2011 IEEE 1st Int. Conf. Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH) Braga: IEEE 2011 1 4
100. Therapy central: On the development of computer games for physiotherapy. Khasawneh N, Malkawi A, Al-Jarrah M, Alsa'di R, Al-Momani S, Fraiwan M a, 2013 9th Int. Conf. Innovations in Information Technology (IIT) Al-Ain: IEEE 2013 24 29
101. New evidence for therapies in stroke rehabilitation. Dobkin BH, Dorsch A, Curr Atherosclerosis Rep 2013 15 6 331
102. Defining functional shoulder range of motion for activities of daily living. Namdari S, Yagnik G, Ebaugh DD, Nagda S, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Mehta S, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012 21 9 1177 1183 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.032 22047785
103. Robot-assisted neurorehabilitation. Sanguineti V, Casadio M, Masia L, Squeri V, Morasso PG, Introduction to Neural Engineering for Motor Rehabilitation Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc 2013 505 528
104. Taking a lesson from patients' recovery strategies to optimize training during robot-aided rehabilitation. Colombo R, Sterpi I, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Pisano F, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012 20 3 276 285 22623406
105. Reducing abnormal synergies of forearm, elbow, and shoulder joints in stroke patients with neuro-rehabilitation robot treatment and assessment. Kung P-c, J Med Biol Eng 2009 32 2 139 146
106. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. Wu G, van der Helm FCT, (DirkJan) Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B, J Biomech 2005 38 5 981 992 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042 15844264
107. Upper limb posture estimation in robotic and virtual reality-based rehabilitation. Cortes C, Ardanza A, Molina-Rueda F, Cuesta-Gomez A, Unzueta L, Epelde G, Ruiz OE, De Mauro A, Florez J, BioMed Res Int 2014 2014 18 doi:10.1155/2014/821908
108. An upper extremity kinematic model for evaluation of hemiparetic stroke. Hingtgen B, McGuire JR, Wang M, Harris GF, J Biomech 2006 39 4 681 688 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.008 16439237
109. Motion tracking and electromyography assist the removal of mirror hand contributions to fNIRS images acquired during a finger tapping task performed by children with cerebral palsy. Hervey N, Khan B, Shagman L, Tian F, Delgado MR, Tulchin-Francis K, Shierk A, Smith L, Reid D, Clegg NJ, Liu H, MacFarlane D, Alexandrakis G, Proc. SPIE, Photonic Therapeutics and Diagnostics IX San Francisco, CA: SPIE 2013 856563-856563 11
110. A transportable camera based motion analysis system with application to monitoring of rehabilitation of hand. Bragge T, Hakkarainen M, World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering; Munich. Volume 25/4 Heidelberg: Springer Berlin 2010 914 917
111. Assessment of reach-to-grasp trajectories toward stationary objects. Supuk T, Bajd T, Kurillo G, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011 26 8 811 818 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.04.007
112. Wilmington robotic exoskeleton: a novel device to maintain arm improvement in muscular disease. Haumont T, Rahman T, Sample W, M King M, Church C, Henley J, Jayakumar S, J Pediat Orthoped 2011 31 5 44 49 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31821f50b5
113. Feasibility of gestural feedback treatment for upper extremity movement in children with cerebral palsy. Wood KC, Lathan CE, Kaufman KR, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2013 21 2 300 305 23193461
114. Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture. Raghavan P, Santello M, Gordon AM, Krakauer JW, J Neurophysiol 2010 103 6 3034 3043 10.1152/jn.00936.2009 20457866
115. Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry. Godfrey A, Conway R, Meagher D, OLaighin G, Med Eng & Phys 2008 30 10 1364 1386 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.005 18996729
116. Magnetic motion tracking system. Otto C, Master thesis. The University of Manitoba 2007
117. Natal Recognizes 31 Body Parts, Uses Tenth of XBox 360. Totilo S, [ http://kotaku.com/5442775/natal-recognizes-31-body-parts-uses-tenth-of-xbox-360-computing-resources ]
118. Upper limb position sensing: a machine vision approach. Han D, Kuschner D, Wang Y, 2nd Int. IEEE EMBS Conf. Neural Engineering Arlington, VA: IEEE 2005 490 493
119. Robust tracking of the upper limb for functional stroke assessment. Allin S, Baker N, Eckel E, Ramanan D, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010 18 5 542 550 20378485
120. Computer vision-based classification of hand grip variations in neurorehabilitation. Zariffa J, Steeves JD, IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robotics, Zurich 2011 2011 5975421
121. Markerless motion capture and measurement of hand kinematics: validation and application to home-based upper limb rehabilitation. Metcalf C, Robinson R, Malpass A, Bogle T, Dell T, Harris C, Demain S, IEEE Trans Bio-med Eng 2013 60 8 2184 2192 23475333
122. Biomechanical Validation of Upper-Body and Lower-Body Joint Movements of Kinect Motion Capture Data for Rehabilitation Treatments. Fern A, Salle L, Ramon U, Sus A, Lligadas X, Fern'ndez-Baena A, Susin A, 2012 Fourth Int. Conf. on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems Bucharest: IEEE 2012 656 661
123. KINECT applications for the physical rehabilitation. Kitsunezaki N, Adachi E, Masuda T, Mizusawa J-I, 2013 IEEE Int. Symp. on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Quebec: IEEE 2013 294 299
124. Vision-based posture assessment to detect and categorize compensation during robotic rehabilitation therapy. Taati B, Wang R, Huq R, Jasper S, Mihailidis A, 2012 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS Int. Conf. on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Rome: IEEE 2012 1607 1613
125. A survey of human motion analysis using depth imagery. Chen L, Wei H, Ferryman J, Pattern Recognit Lett 2013 34 15 1995 2006 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.02.006
126. Mirror therapy with an exoskeleton upper-limb robot based on IMU measurement system. Wang W-W, Fu L-C, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications Bari: IEEE 2011 370 375
127. Changes in bimanual coordination during the first 6 weeks after moderate hemiparetic stroke. Metrot J, Mottet D, Hauret I, van Dokkum L, Bonnin-Koang H-Y, Torre K, Laffont I, J Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013 27 3 251 259 10.1177/1545968312461072
128. Performance of the 'unaffected' upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Roy PM, Guay M, Stroke; J Cerebral Circ 1996 27 9 1564 1570 10.1161/01.STR.27.9.1564
129. Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. R Sainburg CG, Poizner H, J Neurophysiol 1993 70 5 2316 47
130. Compensatory arm reaching strategies after stroke: induced position analysis. Liu W, McCombe Waller S, Kepple TM, Whitall J, J Rehabil Res Dev 2013 50 1 71 84 10.1682/JRRD.2011.04.0074 23516085
131. Bobath B, Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment London: Heinemann Medical Books 1978