Results of clinicians using a therapeutic robotic system in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Abdullah, Hussein A ^a   Tarry, Cole ^a   Lambert, Cynthia ^b   Barreca, Susan ^c   Allen, Brian O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITAL SUBDIVISIONS AND COMPONENTS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL UNITS; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; MALE; PARESIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 80052035221     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-50     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: A critical review. Barreca S, Wolf S, Fasoli S, Bohannon R, Neurorehabil &Neural Repair 2003 17 220 226 10.1177/0888439003259415 (Pubitemid 37421122)
2. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994 75 8 852 857 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90108-2 8053790 (Pubitemid 24251951)
3. Activity-dependent factors affecting poststroke functional outcomes. Fisher B, Sullivan K, Topics in Stroke Rehabil 2001 8 3 31 44 10.1310/B3JD-NML4-V1FB-5YHG (Pubitemid 33095709)
4. Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. Schaechter JD, Prog Neurobiol 2004 73 1 61 72 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.04.001 15193779 (Pubitemid 38749091)
5. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. Biernaskie J, Chemenko G, Corbett D, J Neurosci 2004 24 5 1245 54 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3834-03.2004 14762143 (Pubitemid 38177031)
6. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dentritic grow after focal ischemic injury. Biernaskie J, Corbett D, J Neurosci 2001 21 4 5272 80 11438602 (Pubitemid 32622952)
7. Time is function. Consensus Panel on the Stroke Rehabilitation System, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario 2007
8. Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man. Mima T, Sadato N, Yazawa T, Fukuyama H, Yonekura Y, Shibasaki H, Brain 1999 4 105 110
9. Neural substrate for the effects of passive training on sensorimtoor cortical representation: a study with functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects. Carel C, Loubinoux I, Thilman AF, Cerebr Blood Flow Metab 2000 20 478 484 (Pubitemid 30164892)
10. Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review. Woldag H, Hummelsheim H, J Neurol 2002 249 518 528 10.1007/s004150200058 12021939 (Pubitemid 34507823)
11. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Van der LJ, Snels I, Beckerman H, Lankhorst G, wagenaar R, Bouter L, Clin Rehabil 2001 15 20 31 10.1191/026921501677557755 11237158 (Pubitemid 32140657)
12. Evidence-Based Review Stroke Rehabilitation, Retrieved. Teasel R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Jutai J, Speechley M, http://08/1/09ebrsr.com/index-home.html
13. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Kwakkel G, Boudewijn J, Kollem, Krebs H, Neurorehabil & Repair 2008 22 2 111 121 (Pubitemid 351287594)
14. Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: Translating research into practice. Fasoli SE, Krebs HL, Hogan N, Top Stroke Rehabil 2004 11 11 19 10.1310/G8XB-VM23-1TK7-PWQU 15592986 (Pubitemid 39658414)
15. "Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation", IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering ". Krebs HI, Hogan NA, Aisen ML, Volpe BT, 1998 6 75 87 no.1
16. Application of robotic/mechatronic systems in special education, rehabilitation therapy, and vocational training: A paradigm shift". Erlandson RF, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 1995 13 1 22 34
17. Patient and staff acceptance of robot technology in occupational therapy. Dijkers MP, de Bear PC, Erlandson RF, Kristy K, Geer DM, Nicholes A, J Rehabil Research & Development 1991 28 2 33 44 10.1682/JRRD.1991.04.0033 6726746
18. Rehabilitation robotics: Performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy. Krebs HI, Palazzolo JJ, Dipietro L, Ferraro M, Krol J, Rannekleiv K, Volpe BT, Hogan N, Autonomous Robots 2003 15 7 20 10.1023/A:1024494031121
19. Comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: A pilot study. Krebs HI, Mernoff S, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan NA, NeuroRehabil 2008 23 81 87 (Pubitemid 352038564)
20. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, et al. N Engl J Med 2010 362 1772 1783 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341 20400552
21. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 663 673
22. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Van der Loos M, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Yap R, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2006 43 5 631 42 10.1682/JRRD.2005.02.0044 17123204 (Pubitemid 44759900)
23. Assessment of active and passive restraint during guided reaching after chronic brain injury. Reinkensmeyer J, Rian D, Schmit Z Rymer, Ann Biomedical Engineering 1999 27 6 952 959
24. The effect of the GENTLE/s Robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. Coote S, Murphy B, Harwin W, Stoke E, Clin Rehabil 2008 22 395 405 10.1177/0269215507085060 18441036 (Pubitemid 351833329)
25. Machine to support motor rehabilitation after stroke: 10 years of experience in Berlin. Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, J Rehabil Research & Devel 2006 43 671 678 10.1682/JRRD.2005.02.0052 6726746 (Pubitemid 44759903)
26. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic Stroke. Whitall J, McCombe A, Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF, Stroke 2000 31 10 2390 2395 10.1161/01.STR.31.10.2390 11022069
27. Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy for patients with spastic hemiparesis: A preliminary study. Fazekas G, Horvath M, Troznai T, Toth A, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2007 39 7 580 2 10.2340/16501977-0087 17724559 (Pubitemid 47455228)
28. Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. Sivan M, O'Connor R, Makower S, Levesley M, Bhakta B, J Rehabil Med 2011 43 181 189 10.2340/16501977-0674 21305232
29. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC, Top Stroke Rehabilitation 2007 4 6 22 44 (Pubitemid 350156151)
30. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: A randomised controlled pilot study 6. Khan L, Zygman M, Rymer W, Reinkensmeyer D, Journal of NeuroEngineering & Rehabil 2006 3 2 1 13 21889537
31. Upper limb robot mediated stroke therapy - GENTLE/s approach. Loureiro R, Amirabdollahian F, Topping M, Driessen B, Harwin W, Autonomous Robots 2003 15 35 51 10.1023/A:1024436732030
32. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. Timmermans AA, Seelen A, Willmann RD, Kingma H, Journal of NeuroEngineering and rehab 2008 6 1 1 44
33. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M, 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2009 4 1 34
34. "A Dynamic Bio-mechanical Model to Assess and Monitor Robot-Assisted Therapy of Upper Limb Impairment". Abdullah HA, Tarry C, Datta R, Mittal GS, Abderrahim M, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2007 44 43 62 no 1 10.1682/JRRD.2006.03.0025 17551857 (Pubitemid 46890057)
35. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: Theoretical constructs item generation and selection. Barreca S, Gowland C, Stratford P, et al. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004 11 4 31 42 10.1310/JU8P-UVK6-68VW-CF3W 15592988 (Pubitemid 39658416)
36. Test-retest reliability,validity and sensitivity of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: A new measure of upper limb function for survivors of stroke. Barreca B, Stratford P, Lambert C, Masters L, Streiner D, Arch Phys Med &Rehabil 2005 86 1616 22 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.017 21880300 (Pubitemid 41115825)
37. Validation of three shortened versions of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: The CAHAI-7, CAHAI-8 and CAHAI-9. Barreca S, Stratford P, Masters L, Lambert C, Griffiths J, McBay C, Physiotherapy Canada 2006 58 1 9 10.3138/ptc.58.1.01
38. Comparing 2 versions of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory with the Action Research Arm Test. Barreca S, Stratford P, Masters L, Lambert C, Griffiths J, Phys Therapy 2006 86 2 245 253 (Pubitemid 43190720)
39. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, et al. Stroke 1993 24 58 63 10.1161/01.STR.24.1.58 8418551 (Pubitemid 23014383)
40. SAS/STAT User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc
41. Statistical methods. Snedecor G, Cochran W, Ames: Iowa State University Press 8 1989