Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1131-1144

  Zollo, Loredana ^a   Rossini, Luca ^b   Bravi, Marco ^a   Magrone, Giovanni ^a   Sterzi, Silvia ^a   Guglielmelli, Eugenio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

^b IRCCS SAN RAFFAELE PISANA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Motor assessment; Robot aided rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL FUNCTIONS; MOTION DECOMPOSITION; PERFORMANCE INDICES; PLANNING STRATEGIES; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; QUANTITATIVE MEASURES; ROBOT-AIDED REHABILITATIONS; ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGIES;

BIOMECHANICS; MOTION COMPENSATION; MOTION PLANNING; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; PATIENT REHABILITATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSORS;

ROBOTICS;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84856018981     PISSN: 01400118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0808-1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Berthier NE (1996) Learning to reach: a mathematical model. Dev Psychol 32:811-823
2. Bhushan N, Shadmehr R (1999) Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields. Biol Cybern 81:39-60
3. Bosecker C, Dipietro L, Volpe B, Krebs HI (2010) Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:1545-9683
4. Bowen A, Lincoln NB (2007) Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2)
5. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC (2007) Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Top Stroke Rehabil 14:22-44
6. Cirstea MC, Levin MF (2000) Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123:940-953
7. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Carrozza MC, Dario P, Minuco G (2008) Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22:50-63
8. Cramer SC (2010) Brain repair after stroke. N Engl J Med 362: 1827-1829
9. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG (1983) Reliability of the Fugl- Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 63:1606-1610
10. Fishbach A, Roy SA, Bastianen C, Miller LE, Houk JC (2005) Kinematic properties of on-line error corrections in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 164:442-457
11. Fishbach A, Roy SA, Bastianen C, Miller LE, Houk JC (2007) Deciding when and how to correct a movement: discrete submovements as a decision making process. Exp Brain Res 177: 45-63
12. Flash T, Henis E (1991) Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets. J Cogn Neurosci 3:220-230
13. Gomez-Pinilla F, Ying Z, Roy RR, Molteni R, Edgerton VR (2002) Voluntary exercise induces a BDNF-mediated mechanism that promotes neuroplasticity. J Neurophysiol 88:2187-2195
14. Gregson JM, Leathley MJ, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK, Watkins CL (2000) Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing 29:223-228
15. Guglielmelli E, Johnson MJ, Shibata T (2009) Guest editorial special issue on rehabilitation robotics. IEEE Trans Robot 25: 477-480
16. Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Koh CL, McKenna K (2010) A systematic review of cognitive interventions to improve functional ability in people who have cognitive impairment following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 17(2):99-107
17. Hogan N, Sternad D (2009) Sensitivity of smoothness measures to movement duration, amplitude, and arrests. J Mot Behav 41:6
18. Hogan N, Krebs HI, Sharon A, Charnnarong J (1995) Interactive robotic therapist. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, U.S. Patent #5466213
19. Jackson SL (2003) Research methods, statistics: a critical thinking approach. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning Ed, Belmont
20. Jones TA, Chu CJ, Grande LA, Gregory AD (1999) Motor skills training enhances lesion-induced structural plasticity in the motor cortex of adult rats. J Neurosci 19:10153-10163
21. Kawato M (1992) Optimization and learning in neural networks for formation and control of coordinated movement. In: Meyer DE, Kornblum S (eds) Attention and performance, vol XIV. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 821-849
22. Kempermann G, Van Praag H, Gage FH (2000) Activitydependent regulation of neuronal plasticity and self repair. Prog Brain Res 127:35-48
23. Krakauer JW (2006) Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 19:84-90
24. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT (1998) Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 6:75-87
25. Krebs HI, Palazzolo JJ, Dipietro L, Ferraro M, Krol J, Rannekleiv K, Volpe BT, Hogan N (2003) Rehabilitation robotics: performance- based progressive robot-assisted therapy. Auton Robots 15:7-20
26. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Williams D, Celestino J, Charles SK, Lynch D, Hogan N (2007) Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 15: 327-335
27. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E (2004) Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 22:281-299
28. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C, Wellwood I, Langhorne P (2004) Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 35:2529-2536
29. Latash ML, Anson JG (1996) What are "normal" movements in atypical populations? Behav Brain Sci 19:55-106
30. Lee D, Port NL, Georgopoulos AP (1997) Manual interception of moving targets II. On-line control of overlapping submovements. Exp Brain Res 116:421-433
31. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL (2009) What do motor "Recovery" and "Compensation" mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23:313-319
32. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever CT, Bravata DM, Duncan PW, Corn BH, Maffucci AD, Nadeau SE, Conroy SS, Powell JM, Huang GD, Peduzzi P (2010) Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 362:1772-1783
33. Masur H (2008) The rational use of robots in neurorehabilitationfact or fiction? Dtsch Arztebl Int 105:329
34. Medical Research Council/Guarantors of Brain (1986) Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. Bailliere Tindall, London
35. Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M (2009) Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke (Review). Cochrane Lib 4:1-44
36. Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JE (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95:340-370
37. Milner T (1992) A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision. Neuroscience 49:487-496
38. Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223-227
39. Novak KE, Miller LE, Houk JC (2000) Kinematics of rapid hand movements in a knobturning task. Exp Brain Res 132:419-433
40. Novak KE, Miller LE, Houk JC (2002) The use of overlapping submovements in the control of rapid hand movements. Exp Brain Res 144(3):351-364
41. Nudo RJ, Friel KM (1999) Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. Rev Neurol 155:713-717
42. Prange GB, Jannink MJA, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Hermens HJ, IJzerman MJ (2006) Systematic review of the effect of robotaided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 43:171-184
43. Rohrer B, Hogan N (2003) Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions: a globally optimal algorithm. Biol Cybern 89: 190-199
44. Rohrer B, Hogan N (2006) Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions II: a scattershot algorithm. Biol Cybern 94: 409-414
45. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI et al (2002) Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 22:8297-8304
46. Rossini L (2010) Neuroinspired interfaces for human-machine interaction. PhD Thesis
47. Saunders JA, Knill DC (2003) Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 152:341-352
48. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224
49. Smith MA, Shadmehr R (2005) Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol 93:2809-2821
50. Smith MA, Brandt J, Shadmehr R (2000) Motor disorder in Huntington's disease begins as a dysfunction in error feedback control. Nature 403:544-549
51. Steenbergen B, Van Thiel E, Hulstijn W, Meulenbroek RGJ (2000) The coordination of reaching and grasping in spastic hemiparesis. Hum Mov Sci 19:75-105
52. Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC (2008) Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 131:425-437
53. Timmermans AAA, Seelen HAM, Willmann RD, Kingma H (2009) Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6:1-18
54. Vallbo AB, Wessberg J (1993) Organization of motor output in slow finger movements in man. J Physiol 469:673-691
55. Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. J Nerv Ment Dis 26:743-752
56. Zollo L, Salerno A, Rossini L, Guglielmelli E (2010) Submovement composition for motion and interaction control of a robot manipulator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics. Tokyo, Japan
57. Zollo L, Gallotta E, Guglielmelli E, Sterzi S (2011) Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 47:223-236