Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 321-329

  Ellis, Michael D ^a   Sukal, Theresa ^a   DeMott, Tobey ^a   Dewald, Julius P A ^a,b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Arm; Haptic; Kinematics; Rehabilitation evaluation; Robotics; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; KINETICS; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE;

AGED; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE SPASTICITY; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PARESIS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; TORQUE; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 45449113008     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968307313509     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dewald JP, Pope PS, Given JD, et al. Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain. 1995 ; 118 (Pt 2). 495-510.
2. Dewald JP, Beer RF Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve. 2001 ; 24: 273-283.
3. Beer RF, Given JD, Dewald JP Task-dependent weakness at the elbow in patients with hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 ; 80: 766-772.
4. Ellis MD, Acosta AM, Yao J., et al. Position-dependent torque coupling and associated muscle activation in the hemiparetic upper extremity. Exp Brain Res. 2007 ; 176: 594-602.
5. Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther. 1966 ; 46: 357-375.
6. Twitchell TE The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain. 1951 ; 74: 443-480.
7. Beer RF, Dewald JP, Dawson ML, et al. Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2004 ; 156: 458-470.
8. Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JP Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res. 2007 ; 183: 215-223.
9. Levin MF Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain. 1996 ; 119 (Pt 1). 281-293.
10. Cirstea MC, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG, et al. Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2003 ; 151: 289-300.
11. Portney LG, Watkins MP Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall ; 2000.
12. Beer RF, Dewald JP, Rymer WZ Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics. Exp Brain Res. 2000 ; 131: 305-319.
13. Haaland KY, Prestopnik JL, Knight RT, et al. Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain. 2004 ; 127: 1145-1158.
14. Lang CE, Beebe J. Relating movement control at 9 upper extremity segments to loss of hand function in people with chronic hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 ; 21: 279-291.
15. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L., Leyman I., et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975 ; 7: 13-31.
16. Gowland C., Stratford P., Ward M., et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke. 1993 ; 24: 58-63.
17. Levin MF, Desrosiers J., Beauchemin D., et al. Development and validation of a scale for rating motor compensations used for reaching in patients with hemiparesis: The Reaching Performance Scale. Phys Ther. 2004 ; 84: 8-22.
18. Bohannon RW, Smith MB Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 ; 67: 206-207.
19. Duncan PW, Wallace D., Lai SM, et al. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999 ; 30: 2131-2140.
20. O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ Physical Rehabilitation: Assessment and Treatment. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis ; 2001.
21. Michaelsen SM, Luta A., Roby-Brami A., et al. Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2001 ; 32: 1875-1883.
22. Beer RF, Ellis MD, Holubar BG, et al. Impact of gravity loading on post-stroke reaching and its relationship to weakness. Muscle Nerve. 2007 ; 36: 242-250.
23. Archambault P., Pigeon P., Feldman AG, et al. Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Exp Brain Res. 1999 ; 126: 55-67.
24. Cirstea MC, Levin MF Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000 ; 123 (Pt 5). 940-953.
25. Kamper DG, McKenna-Cole AN, Kahn LE, et al. Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 ; 83: 702-707.
26. Zackowski KM, Dromerick AW, Sahrmann SA, et al. How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis? Brain. 2004 ; 127: 1035-1046.
27. Wagner JM, Lang CE, Sahrmann SA, et al. Relationships between sensorimotor impairments and reaching deficits in acute hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 ; 20: 406-416.