The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Dukelow, Sean P ^a   Herter, Troy M ^a,b,c   Bagg, Stephen D ^d,e   Scott, Stephen H ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d St Mary's of the Lake Hospital   (Canada)

^e QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Position sense; Proprioception; Rehabilitation; Robotics; Stroke; Visuomotor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROBOTICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; POSTURE; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84866936475     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-72     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Twitchell TE, Brain 1951 74 443 480 10.1093/brain/74.4.443 14895765
2. Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993 74 602 611 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90158-7 8503750 (Pubitemid 23172762)
3. Functional prognosis in stroke: use of somatosensory evoked potentials. Zeman BD, Yiannikas C, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989 52 242 247 10.1136/jnnp.52.2.242 2703840 (Pubitemid 19054201)
4. Somatosensory evoked response and recovery from stroke. Chester CS, McLaren CE, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989 70 520 525 2742467 (Pubitemid 19183636)
5. Acute stroke patients: long-term effects of rehabilitation and maintenance of gains. Davidoff GN, Keren O, Ring H, Solzi P, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991 72 869 873 10.1016/0003-9993(91)90001-Y 1929802
6. Predicting functional outcome following acute stroke using a standard clinical examination. Prescott RJ, Garraway WM, Akhtar AJ, Stroke 1982 13 641 647 10.1161/01.STR.13.5.641 7123597 (Pubitemid 12011075)
7. Proprioception and spatial neglect after stroke. Smith DL, Akhtar AJ, Garraway WM, Age Ageing 1983 12 63 69 10.1093/ageing/12.1.63 6846094 (Pubitemid 13185722)
8. On the proprio-ceptive system, especially in its reflex aspect. Sherrington CS, Brain 1907 29 467 482 10.1093/brain/29.4.467
9. The relationship between sensory impairment and motor recovery in patients with hemiplegia. Kuffosky A, Wadell I, Nilsson BY, Scand J Rehabil Med 1982 14 27 32 7063817 (Pubitemid 12177712)
10. Prediction of arm and hand function recovery in stroke patients. de Weerdt W, Lincoln NB, Harrison MA, Int J Rehabil Res 1987 10 110 112 3503832
11. Somatosensory evoked potentials: their predictive value in right hemiplegia. La Joie WJ, Reddy NM, Melvin JL, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982 63 223 226 7073461 (Pubitemid 12117482)
12. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983 46 521 524 10.1136/jnnp.46.6.521 6875585 (Pubitemid 13099699)
13. A follow-up study of stroke patients 5-6 years after their brain infarct. Wadell I, Kusoffsky A, Nilsson BY, Int J Rehabil Res 1987 10 103 110 3503830
14. Does proprioceptive loss influence recovery of the upper extremity after stroke. Rand D, Weiss PL, Gottlieb D, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1999 13 15 21 10.1177/154596839901300104 (Pubitemid 29462922)
15. Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement. Katrak P, Bowring G, Conroy P, Chilvers M, Poulos R, McNeil D, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998 79 758 761 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90352-5 9685087 (Pubitemid 28322135)
16. 'Thumb localizing test' for detecting a lesion in the posterior column-medial lemniscal system. Hirayama K, Fukutake T, Kawamura M, J Neurol Sci 1999 167 45 49 10.1016/S0022-510X(99)00136-7 10500261 (Pubitemid 29401969)
17. The unreliability of sensory assessments. Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA, Hodgson P, Clin Rehabil 1991 5 273 282 10.1177/026921559100500403
18. Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. Carey LM, Oke LE, Matyas TA, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996 77 1271 1278 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90192-6 8976311 (Pubitemid 26424841)
19. Potential of robots as next-generation technology for clinical assessment of neurological disorders and upper-limb therapy. Scott SH, Dukelow SP, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Design 2011 48 335 354 10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0057
20. Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Volpe BT, Huerta PT, Zipse JL, Rykman A, Edwards D, Dipietro L, Hogan N, Krebs HI, Arch Neurol 2009 66 1086 1090 10.1001/archneurol.2009.182 19752297
21. Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Bosecker C, Dipietro L, Volpe B, Krebs HI, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 62 69 10.1177/1545968309343214 19684304
22. A quantitative and standardized robotic method for the evaluation of arm proprioception after stroke. Simo LS, Ghez C, Botzer L, Scheidt RA, Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference 2011 2011 8227 8230
23. Integrating proprioceptive assessment with proprioceptive training of stroke patients. Squeri V, Zenzeri J, Morasso P, Basteris A, IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011 2011 5975500 22275696
24. Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Glasgow JI, Bagg SD, Norman KE, Scott SH, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 178 187 10.1177/1545968309345267 19794134
25. Assessment of upper-limb sensorimotor function of subacute stroke patients using visually guided reaching. Coderre AM, Zeid AA, Dukelow SP, Demmer MJ, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Bretzke H, Herter TM, Glasgow JI, Norman KE, et al. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 528 541 10.1177/1545968309356091 20233965
26. Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke: a systematic review. Schabrun SM, Hillier S, Clin Rehabil 2009 23 27 39 10.1177/ 0269215508098897 19114435
27. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) index score following stroke. Tekeoglu Y, Adak B, Goksoy T, Clin Rehabil 1998 12 277 280 9744663 (Pubitemid 28429956)
28. Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Conforto AB, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG, Ann Neurol 2002 51 122 125 10.1002/ana.10070 11782992 (Pubitemid 34027985)
29. Cutaneous electrical stimulation may enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke. Peurala SH, Pitkanen K, Sivenius J, Tarkka IM, Clin Rehabil 2002 16 709 716 10.1191/0269215502cr543oa 12428819 (Pubitemid 35276570)
30. Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 87 351 357 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.019 16500168 (Pubitemid 43286943)
31. Somatosensory stimulation enhances the effects of training functional hand tasks in patients with chronic stroke. Celnik P, Hummel F, Harris-Love M, Wolk R, Cohen LG, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 88 1369 1376 10.1016/j.apmr.2007. 08.001 17964875 (Pubitemid 47625315)
32. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in chronic cortico-subcortical strokes. Conforto AB, Cohen LG, dos Santos RL, Scaff M, Marie SK, J Neurol 2007 254 333 339 10.1007/s00415-006-0364-z 17345047 (Pubitemid 46399194)
33. Effects of home-based sensory and motor amplitude electrical stimulation on arm dysfunction in chronic stroke. Sullivan JE, Hedman LD, Clin Rehabil 2007 21 142 150 10.1177/0269215506071252 17264108 (Pubitemid 46323066)
34. Effect of sensory-amplitude electric stimulation on motor recovery and gait kinematics after stroke: a randomized controlled study. Yavuzer G, Oken O, Atay MB, Stam HJ, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 88 710 714 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02. 030 17532891 (Pubitemid 46802394)
35. Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching. Scott SH, J Neurosci Methods 1999 89 119 127 10.1016/S0165-0270(99)00053-9 10491942 (Pubitemid 29361506)
36. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Oldfield RC, Neuropsychologia 1971 9 97 113 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 5146491
37. Transient unilateral catalepsy and right parietal damage. Fukutake T, Hirayama K, Komatsu T, Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol 1993 47 647 650 8301882 (Pubitemid 23351739)
38. Putaminal hemorrhage disrupts thalamocortical projection to secondary somatosensory cortex: case report. Hiraga A, Sakakibara R, Mizobuchi K, Asahina M, Kuwabara S, Hayashi Y, Hattori T, J Neurol Sci 2005 231 81 83 10.1016/j.jns.2004.11.049 15792825 (Pubitemid 40432030)
39. Kinesthetic alexia due to left parietal lobe lesions. Ihori N, Kawamura M, Araki S, Kawachi J, Eur Neurol 2002 48 87 96 10.1159/000062993 12186998 (Pubitemid 34983850)
40. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ, Stroke 2003 34 2181 2186 10.1161/01.STR.0000087172. 16305.CD 12907818 (Pubitemid 37099833)
41. Recovery of patients with a combined motor and proprioception deficit during the first six weeks of post stroke rehabilitation. Rand D, Gottlieb D, Weiss PL, Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2001 18 69 87 10.1080/J148v18n03-05 (Pubitemid 33095136)
42. Neuromagnetic investigation of somatosensory cortical reorganization in hemiplegic patients after thalamic hemorrhage. Yoshida H, Kondo T, Nakasato N, J Phys Ther Sci 2008 20 123 127 10.1589/jpts.20.123
43. Isolated facio-lingual hypoalgesia and weakness after a hemorrhagic infarct localized at the contralateral operculum. Sakakibara R, Kishi M, Ogawa E, Shirai K, J Neurol Sci 2009 276 193 195 10.1016/j.jns.2008.08.035 18834995
44. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Bohannon RW, Smith MB, Phys Ther 1987 67 206 207 3809245 (Pubitemid 17026064)
45. The purdue pegboard: norms and studies of reliability and validity. Tiffen J, Asher EJ, J Appl Psychol 1948 32 234 247 18867059
46. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the chedoke-mcMaster stroke assessment. Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S, Sanford J, Barreca S, Vanspall B, Plews N, Stroke 1993 24 58 63 10.1161/01.STR.24.1.58 8418551 (Pubitemid 23014383)
47. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS, Adv Clin Rehabil 1987 1 6 18 3503663
48. Bickley LS, Szilagyi PG, Bates' Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking (9th Edition) Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Hagerstown, MD 2007 23276218
49. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987 68 98 102 3813864 (Pubitemid 17017760)
50. Age-related differences in upper limb proprioceptive acuity. Adamo DE, Martin BJ, Brown SH, Percept Mot Skills 2007 104 1297 1309 17879664
51. The influence of age and physical activity on upper limb proprioceptive ability. Adamo DE, Alexander NB, Brown SH, J Aging Phys Act 2009 17 272 293 19799100
52. Functional implications of age differences in motor system connectivity. Langan J, Peltier SJ, Bo J, Fling BW, Welsh RC, Seidler RD, Front Syst Neurosci 2010 4 17 20589101
53. Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects. Seidler RD, Bernard JA, Burutolu TB, Fling BW, Gordon MT, Gwin JT, Kwak Y, Lipps DB, Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010 34 721 733 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.005 19850077
54. Men and women exhibit a differential bias for processing movement versus objects. McGivern RF, Adams B, Handa RJ, Pineda JA, PLoS One 2012 7 32238 10.1371/journal.pone.0032238 22431972
55. Preliminary sex differences in human cortical BOLD fMRI activity during the preparation of increasingly complex visually guided movements. Gorbet DJ, Sergio LE, Eur J Neurosci 2007 25 1228 1239 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05358.x 17331218
56. Males and females differ in brain activation during cognitive tasks. Bell EC, Willson MC, Wilman AH, Dave S, Silverstone PH, NeuroImage 2006 30 529 538 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.049 16260156
57. Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets. Goble DJ, Brown SH, J Neurophysiol 2008 99 3063 3074 10.1152/jn.90259.2008 18436632
58. Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback. Goble DJ, Lewis CA, Brown SH, Exp Brain Res 2006 168 307 311 10.1007/s00221-005-0280-y 16311728 (Pubitemid 41752837)
59. Upper limb asymmetries in the perception of proprioceptively determined dynamic position sense. Goble DJ, Brown SH, J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2010 36 768 775 20515203
60. Proprioceptive target matching asymmetries in left-handed individuals. Goble DJ, Noble BC, Brown SH, Experimental brain research Experimentelle Hirnforschung Experimentation cerebrale 2009 197 403 408 10.1007/s00221-009- 1922-2 19572124
61. Dynamic dominance varies with handedness: reduced interlimb asymmetries in left-handers. Przybyla A, Good DC, Sainburg RL, Experimental brain research Experimentelle Hirnforschung Experimentation cerebrale 2012 216 419 431 10.1007/s00221-011-2946-y 22113487
62. Handedness, dexterity, and motor cortical representations. Bernard JA, Taylor SF, Seidler RD, J Neurophysiol 2011 105 88 99 10.1152/jn.00512.2010 20943944
63. Bobath B, Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treament Heinemann, London 1970
64. Mapping proprioception across a 2D horizontal workspace. Wilson ET, Wong J, Gribble PL, PLoS One 2010 5 11851 10.1371/journal.pone.0011851 20686612
65. Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning. Wong JD, Wilson ET, Gribble PL, J Neurophysiol 2011 105 2512 2521 10.1152/jn.00949.2010 21368000
66. Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke. Beebe JA, Lang CE, Stroke 2009 40 1772 1779 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.536763 19265051
67. Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Dewald JP, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 321 329 18326888 (Pubitemid 351852642)
68. Muscle spindle signals combine with the sense of effort to indicate limb position. Winter JA, Allen TJ, Proske U, J Physiol 2005 568 1035 1046 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092619 16109730 (Pubitemid 41646040)
69. Joint sense, muscle sense, and their combination as position sense, measured at the distal interphalangeal joint of the middle finger. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI, J Physiol 1976 260 387 407 978533
70. Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Scott SH, Nat Rev Neurosci 2004 5 532 546 15208695
71. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Trends Neurosci 1992 15 20 25 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 1374953
72. Action without perception in human vision. Goodale MA, Cogn Neuropsychol 2008 25 891 919 10.1080/02643290801961984 18608333
73. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Kroliczak G, Heard P, Goodale MA, Gregory RL, Brain Res 2006 1080 9 16 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.01.107 16516866