Compensation for the intrinsic dynamics of the InMotion2 robot

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 214, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 15-20

  Nguyen, Hoi B ^a,b   Lum, Peter S ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Catholic University of America ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Impedance; Motor adaptation; Robot mediated rehabilitation; Robotics; Upper extremity; Upper limb rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; FORCE; IMPEDANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; ROBOTICS; VELOCITY;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANISOTROPY; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; TORQUE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873465346     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bosecker C., Dipietro L., Volpe B., Krebs H.I. Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010, 24(1):62-69.
2. Campolo D., Accoto D., Formica D., Guglielmelli E. Intrinsic constraints of neural origin: assessment and application to rehabilitation robotics. IEEE Trans Robot 2009, 25(3):492-501.
3. Dowling J.J., Durkin J.L., Andrews D.M. The uncertainty of the pendulum method for the determination of the moment of inertia. Med Eng Phys 2006, 28(8):837-841.
4. Flash T., Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 1985, 5(7):1688-1703.
5. Finley M.A., Dipietro L., Ohlhoff J., Whitall J., Krebs H.I., Bever C.T. The effect of repeated measurements using an upper extremity robot on healthy adults. J Appl Biomech 2009, 25(2):103-110.
6. Huang F.C., Patton J.L., Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Manual skill generalization enhanced by negative viscosity. J Neurophysiol 2010, 104(4):2008-2019.
7. Hwang E.J., Smith M.A., Shadmehr R. Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields. Exp Brain Res 2006, 169(4):496-506.
8. Krebs H.I., Hogan N., Aisen M.L., Volpe B.T. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998, 6(1):75-87.
9. Lo A.C., Guarino P.D., Richards L.G., Haselkorn J.K., Wittenberg G.F., Federman D.G., et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010, 362(19):1772-1783.
10. Orban de Xivry J.J., Ahmadi-Pajouh M.A., Harran M.D., Salimpour Y., Shadmehr R. Changes in corticospinal excitability during reach adaptation in force fields. J Neurophysiol 2012, [Epub ahead of print, October 3].
11. Schabowsky C.N., Hidler J.M., Lum P.S. Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment. Exp Brain Res 2007, 182(4):567-577.
12. Schabowsky C.N., Dromerick A.W., Holley R.J., Monroe B., Lum P.S. Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment. Exp Brain Res 2008, 188(4):589-601.
13. Scheidt R.A., Stoeckmann T. Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. J Neurophysiol 2007, 97(4):2824-2836.
14. Tagliamonte N.L., Formica D., Campolo D., Guglielmelli E. Coping with intrinsic constraints of neural origin in the design of rehabilitation robots: a preliminary study. 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering 2009, 124-127.
15. Tagliamonte N.L., Scorcia M., Formica D., Campolo D., Guglielmelli E. Effects of impedance reduction of a robot for wrist rehabilitation on human motor strategies in healthy subjects during pointing tasks. Adv Robot 2011, 25(5):537-562.