Robotic identification of kinesthetic deficits after stroke

Stroke

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3414-3421

  Semrau, Jennifer A ^a,b   Herter, Troy M ^a,b,c,f   Scott, Stephen H ^c,d,e   Dukelow, Sean P ^a,b,g,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^d QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology ^*  (Canada)

^f School of Medicine   (Canada)

^g QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Kinesthesis; Proprioception; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BODY POSITION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HAND; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; KINESTHETIC DEFICIT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; ORTHOPEDIC SOFTWARE; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTIC EXOSKELETON; ROBOTICS; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; VELOCITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

KINESTHESIS; PROPRIOCEPTION; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; SENSATION DISORDERS; STROKE;

EID: 84889250046     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002058     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sherrington CS. On the proprio-ceptive system, especially in its reflex aspect. Brain. 1907;29:467-482.
2. Sullivan JE, Hedman LD. Sensory dysfunction following stroke: incidence, significance, examination, and intervention. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:200-217.
3. Schabrun SM, Hillier S. Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:27-39.
4. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Glasgow JI, Bagg SD, et al. Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:178-187.
5. Ryerson S, Byl NN, Brown DA, Wong RA, Hidler JM. Altered trunk position sense and its relation to balance functions in people post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008;32:14-20.
6. Sanguineti V, Casadio M, Vergaro E, Squeri V, Giannoni P, Morasso PG. Robot therapy for stroke survivors: proprioceptive training and regulation of assistance. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;145:126-142.
7. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Bagg SD, Scott SH. The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:72.
8. Lincoln N, Crow J, Jackson J, Waters G, Adams S, Hodgson P. The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin Rehabil. 1991;5:273-282
9. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein OTR L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 2000;54:1938-1944.
10. Patton J, Dawe G, Scharver C, Mussa-Ivaldi F, Kenyon R. Robotics and virtual reality: a perfect marriage for motor control research and rehabilitation. Assist Technol. 2006;18:181-195.
11. Lo AC, Guarino P, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever CT, Duncan PW, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of robot-assisted rehabilitation for chronic stroke: methods and entry characteristics for VA ROBOTICS. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:775-783.
12. Hogan N, Krebs HI. Physically interactive robotic technology for neuromotor rehabilitation. Prog Brain Res. 2011;192:59-68.
13. Scott SH, Dukelow SP. Potential of robots as next-generation technology for clinical assessment of neurological disorders and upper-limb therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48:335-353.
14. Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Dewald JP. Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:321-329.
15. Bosecker C, Dipietro L, Volpe B, Krebs HI. Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:62-69.
16. Coderre AM, Zeid AA, Dukelow SP, Demmer MJ, Moore KD, Demers MJ, et al. Assessment of upper-limb sensorimotor function of subacute stroke patients using visually guided reaching. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:528-541.
17. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97-113.
18. Hirayama K, Fukutake T, Kawamura M. 'Thumb localizing test' for detecting a lesion in the posterior column-medial lemniscal system. J Neurol Sci. 1999;167:45-49.
19. Scott SH. Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching. J Neurosci Methods. 1999;89:119-127.
20. Goble DJ, Noble BC, Brown SH. Where was my arm again? Memorybased matching of proprioceptive targets is enhanced by increased target presentation time. Neurosci Lett. 2010;481:54-58.
21. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain. 2007;130(pt 8):2146-2158.
22. Naito E, Roland PE, Grefkes C, Choi HJ, Eickhoff S, Geyer S, et al. Dominance of the right hemisphere and role of area 2 in human kinesthesia. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:1020-1034.
23. Connell LA, Tyson SF. Measures of sensation in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26:68-80.
24. Chen JC, Liang CC, Shaw FZ. Facilitation of sensory and motor recovery by thermal intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2005;36:2665-2669.
25. Smith PS, Dinse HR, Kalisch T, Johnson M, Walker-Batson D. Effects of repetitive electrical stimulation to treat sensory loss in persons poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:2108-2111.
26. Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M, Rueckriem S, Mehrholz J, Lingnau ML. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers. Stroke. 2005;36:1960-1966.