The 'hedonic' in human-computer interaction - History, contributions, and future research directions

Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 305-314

  Diefenbach, Sarah ^a   Kolb, Nina ^b   Hassenzahl, Marc ^a  

^a Folkwang Hochschule Essen   (Germany)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Antecedents; Assessment; Consequences; Contributions; Correlates; Definitions; Hedonic; Review

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PRODUCT DESIGN; REVIEWS;

ANTECEDENTS; ASSESSMENT; CONSEQUENCES; CONTRIBUTIONS; CORRELATES; DEFINITIONS; HEDONIC;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84904465523     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2598510.2598549     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (60)

1. Allen, M. W. A practical method for uncovering the direct and indirect relationships between human values and consumer purchases. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(2001), 102-120.
2. Andrzejewski, J. Designing a User Interface for Smartphone. A Balance Between the Pragmatic and the Hedonic Dimension of Usability. Thesis, LinkÖping University, 2003.
3. Arrasvuori, J., Korhonen, H. and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. (2010). Exploring playfulness in user experience of personal mobile products. In Proc. OZCHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 88-95.
4. Arnold, M. J. and Reynolds, K. E. Hedonic shopping motivation, Journal of Retailing, 79(2003), 77-95.
5. Bargas-Avila, J. A. and Hornbæk, K. Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 2689-2698.
6. Bernardo, M., Marimon, F., and Alonso-Almeida, M. Functional quality and hedonic quality: A study of the dimensions of e-service quality in online travel agencies. Information & Management, 49, 7-8(2012), 342-347.
7. Bradley, M. M., and Lang, P. J. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25, 1(1994), 49-59.
8. Brecht, F., Berger, C., Eckhardt, A., and Günther, O. (2012). Corporate Career Presences on Social Network Sites: An Analysis of Hedonic and Utilitarian Value. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 2441-2450.
9. Burmester, M. and Dufner, A. Designing the stimulation effect of hedonic quality - an exploratory study. In Pivec, M. (Ed.). Affective and Emotional Aspects of Human-Computer-Interaction. IOS (2006), 217-233.
10. Cockton, G. Designing worth-connecting preferred means to desired ends. interactions, 15, 4(2008), 54-57.
11. Davis, F. D. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. MIT, 1986.
12. Desmet, P. M. A., Overbeeke, C. J., and Tax, S. J. E. T. Designing products with added emotional value: development and application of an approach for research through design. The Design Journal, 4(2001), 32-47.
13. Diefenbach, S. and Hassenzahl, M. The dilemma of the hedonic-Appreciated, but hard to justify. Interacting with Computers, 23, 5(2011), 461-472.
14. Gross, A., and Bongartz, S. Why do I like it? Investigating the Product-Specificity of User Experience. In Proc. NordiCHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 322-330).
15. Harbich, S. and Auer, S. Rater bias: The influence of hedonic quality on usability questionnaires. In Proc. INTERACT 2005, Springer (2005), 1129-1133.
16. Hassenzahl, M. The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product. In Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A., and Wright, P. (Eds.). Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005, 31-42.
17. Hassenzahl, M. The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4(2004), 319-349.
18. Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., and GÖritz, A. Needs, affect, and interactive products - Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22, 5(2010), 353-362.
19. Hassenzahl, M, Eckoldt, K., Diefenbach, S., Laschke, M., and Lenz, E. Designing moments of meaning and pleasure - Experience Design. International Journal of Design, 7, 3(2013), 21-31.
20. Hassenzahl, M. and Monk, A. The Inference of Perceived Usability From Beauty. Human-Computer Interaction 25, 3(2010), 235-260.
21. Hassenzahl, M, Platz, A., Burmester, M, and Lehner, K. Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 201-208.
22. Hekkert, P., Snelders, D., and van Wieringen, P. C. W. 'Most advanced, yet acceptable': Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2003), 111-124.
23. Helfenstein, S. Increasingly emotional design for growingly pragmatic users? A report from Finland. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31, 2(2012), 185-204.
24. Hertzum, M. Images of Usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26, 6(2010), 567-600.
25. Hirschman, E. C., and Holbrook, M. B. Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(1982), 92-101.
26. Holm, J., Lehtiniemi, A., and Eronen, A. Evaluating an Avatar-Based User Interface for Discovering New Music. In Proc. MUM 2010, ACM Press (2010), Art. 9.
27. Huang, M.-H. Web performance scale. Information & Management 42, 6(2005), 841-852.
28. Jordan, P. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. CRC Press, London, England, 2002.
29. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Martens, J.-B. User experience over time: an initial framework. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 729-738.
30. Kauer, M., Theuerling, H., and Bruder, R. The importance of identification for the acceptance of consumer electronics on the example of the Wii. Behaviour & Information Technology (2012), 1-15.
31. Knickmeyer, R. L. and Mateas, M. Preliminary evaluation of the interactive drama facade. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 1549-1552.
32. Kujala, S., Roto, V., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., and Sinnelä, A. Identifying Hedonic Factors in Long-Term User Experience. In Proc. DPPI 2011, ACM Press (2011), Article 17.
33. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., and Schrepp, M. Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5298(2008), 63-76.
34. Law, E. The measurability and predictability of user experience. In Proc. EICS 11, ACM Press (2011), 1-10
35. Law, E. and van Schaik, P. Modelling user experience - An agenda for research and practice. Interacting with Computers, 22, 5(2010), 313-322.
36. Lee, N., Shin, H., and Sundar, S. S. (2011). Utilitarian vs. hedonic robots: role of parasocial tendency and anthropomorphism in shaping user attitudes. In Proc. HRI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 183-184.
37. Liu, S., Zheng, X. S., Liu, G., Jian, J., Liu, Z., and Peng, K. Assessing User Experience of Interactive Products: A Chinese Questionnaire. In Proc. VINCI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 104-109.
38. Magni, M., Susan Taylor, M., and Venkatesh, V. "To play or not to play": A cross-temporal investigation using hedonic and instrumental perspectives to explain user intentions to explore a technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 9(2010), 572-588.
39. Marcus, A., Schieder, T. K., and Cantoni. L. The travel machine: mobile UX design that combines information design with persuasion design. In Proc. DUXU 2013, Springer (2013), 696-705.
40. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. C. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004.
41. Moss, G., Horvath, G., and Gunn, R. Refining our understanding of men and women's design preferences. In Proc. "Towards a UX Manifesto", HCI 2007, (2007), 71-76.
42. Mundorf, N., Westin, S., and Dholakia, N. Effects of hedonic components and user's gender on the acceptance of screen-based information services. Behaviour & Information Technology, 12, 5(1993), 293-303.
43. O'Brien, H. L. The influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on user engagement: The case of online shopping experiences. Interacting with Computers 22, 5(2010), 344-352.
44. Ogertschnig, M., and Heijden, H. V. D. A Short-Form Measure Of Attitude Towards Using A Mobile Information Service. In Proc. BLED 2004, Paper 2.
45. Partala, T. and Kallinen, A. Understanding the most satisfying and unsatisfying user experiences: Emotions, psychological needs, and context. Interacting with computers, 24, 1(2012), 25-34.
46. Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., and Kasser, T. What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80, 2(2001), 325-339.
47. Spangenberg, E. R., Voss, K. E., and Crowley, A. E. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitude: a generally applicable scale. Advances in Consumer Research, 24(1997), 235-241.
48. Stelmaszewska, H., Fields, B., and Blandford, A. Conceptualising user hedonic experience. In Proc. ECCE 12, EACE (2004), 12-15.
49. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., and Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2000), 127-145.
50. Tuch, A. N., Roth, S. P., Hornbæk, K., Opwis, K., and Bargas-Avila, J. A. Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 5(2012), 1596-1607.
51. van der Heijden, H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28, 4, (2004), 695-704.
52. van Schaik, P. and Ling, J. Modelling user experience with web sites: Usability, hedonic value, beauty and goodness. Interacting with Computers, 20, 3(2008), 419-432.
53. van Schaik, P. and Ling, J. An integrated model of interaction experience for information retrieval in a Web-based encyclopaedia. Interacting with Computers 23, 1(2011), 18-32.
54. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Suhonen, K., Gonsalves, T., Schrader, M., and Järvenpää, T. Carpe diem: exploring user experience and intimacy in eye-based video conferencing. In Proc. MUM 10, ACM Press (2011), 113-122.
55. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Wäljas, M., Ojala, J., and Segerståhl, K. Identifying drivers and hindrances of social user experience in web services. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 2499-2502.
56. Väätäjä, H., Koponen, T., and Roto, V. Developing practical tools for user experience evaluation: a case from mobile news journalism. In Proc. ECCE 2009, VTT (2009), Art. 23.
57. Venkatesh, V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11, 4(2000), 342-365.
58. Wechsung, I., Naumann, A., and MÖller, S. The Influence of the Usage Mode on Subjectively Perceived Quality. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6392(2010), 188-193.
59. Wechsung, I., and Schleicher, R. Modelling Modality Choice Using Task Parameters and Perceived Quality. In Proc. Speech Communication, VDE (2012), 1-4.
60. Xu, L., Lin, J., and Chan, H. C. The Moderating Effects of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Information Technology Continuance. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19, 2(2012), 1-26.