Identifying hedonic factors in long-term user experience

DPPI'11 - Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Kujala, Sari ^a   Roto, Virpi ^a,b   Väänänen Vainio Mattila, Kaisa ^a   Sinnelä, Arto ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

delight; Facebook; long term user experience; mobile phone; user experience

Indexed keywords

CURVE METHOD; DELIGHT; FACEBOOK; HEDONIC ASPECTS; HEDONIC QUALITY; INDUSTRIAL CONTEXT; STRAIGHT-FORWARD METHOD; USER EXPERIENCE;

CELLULAR TELEPHONES; MOBILE PHONES; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84866518585     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2347504.2347523     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., Mahajan, V. Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing, 2008, 72, 48-63.
2. Forlizzi, J. and Battarbee, K., Understanding experience in interactive systems. Proceedings of Designing interactive systems conference, 2004, 261-268.
3. Hassenzahl, M. The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2001, 13, 4, 481-499.
4. Hassenzahl, M. The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, Blythe, M., C. Overbeeke, C. Monk, A.F. and Wright, P.C, (Eds), 2003, 32-42.
5. Hassenzahl, M. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 2004, 329-349.
6. Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., Lehner, K., Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. In: Turner, T., Szwillus, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the CHI Conference, 2000, ACM, pp. 201-208.
7. Hassenzahl, M., Schöbel, M., Trautmann, T. How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: The role of regulatory focus. Interacting with Computers, 20, 2008, 473-479.
8. Hassenzahl, M.,Tractinsky, N. User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2006, 25, 2, 91-97.
9. Hassenzahl, M., Ullrich, D. To do or not to do: Differences in user experience and retrospective judgements depending on the presence of absence of instrumental goals. Interacting with Computers, 2007, 19, 429-437.
10. Hsee, C. Elastic justification: how tempting but task-irrelevant factors influence decisions. Organizational behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 3, 1995, 330-337.
11. ISO FDIS 9241-210 Human-centred design process for interactive systems. International Organisation for Standardisation, 2009.
12. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., Schwarz, N., Stone, A.A. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 2004, 306, 1776-1780.
13. Karapanos, E., Hassenzahl, M., Marten, J.-B. User experience over time. In CHI'08 extended abstracts, 2008, ACM, pp. 3561-3566.
14. Karapanos, E., Martens, J.-B., Hassenzahl, M., Reconstructing experiences through sketching. arXiv pre-print available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.5343
15. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J, Martens, J-B., User experience over time: An initial framework, in CHI '09 Proceedings, 2009, ACM, pp. 729-738.
16. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. Martens, J.-B., Measuring the dynamics of remembered experience over time. Interacting with Computers, 2010, 22, 5, 328-335.
17. Mahlke, S., Aesthetic and Symbolic Qualities as Antecedents of Overall Judgments of Interactive Products, in People and Computers XX - Engage, Proceedings of HCI '06. 2006, Springer: London.
18. Norman, D.A. Memory is more important than actuality. Interactions, 2009. March + April: p. 24-26.
19. Oishi, S. and Sullivan, H.W. The predictive value of daily vs. retrospective well-being judgments in relationship stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2006, 42, 4, 460-470.
20. Reichheld, F.F. The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 2003, 81 (12): p. 46-54.
21. Richins, M. Valuing things: The public and private meanings of possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, December 1994, 21, 504-521.
22. Schrepp, M., Held, T., Laugwitz, B. The influence of hedonic quality on the attractiveness of user interfaces of business management software. Interacting with Computers, 2006, 18, 1055-1069.
23. Shiffman, S., Stone, A.A., Hufford, M.R. Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2007, 4, 1-32.
24. Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Law, W.L.-C., Roto, V. Obrist, M., Hoonhaut, J., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., User experience evaluation methods: Current state and development needs. In Proceedings of the NordiCHI conference, 2010, pp. 521-530.
25. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, M., Hassenzahl, M., and Platz, A., Dynamics of user experience: How the perceived quality of mobile phones changes over time, in User Experience - Towards a unified view, Workshop at the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2006, pp. 74-78.