The influence of the usage mode on subjectively perceived quality

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6392 LNAI, Issue , 2010, Pages 188-193

  Wechsung, Ina ^a   Naumann, Anja ^a   Möller, Sebastian ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Multimodal Interaction; Usability; User Experience

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; EVALUATION STUDY; MOBILE ENTERTAINMENTS; MULTI-MODAL; MULTI-MODAL INTERACTIONS; PERCEIVED QUALITY; SPECIFIC TASKS; USABILITY; USER EXPERIENCE;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SPEECH PROCESSING; USER INTERFACES;

USER INTERFACES; SPEECH PROCESSING;

EID: 78549261045     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16202-2_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Hornbæk, K., Law, E.L.: Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007, pp. 617-626. ACM Press, New York (2007)
2. Hassenzahl, M.: User Experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th French-Speaking Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 11-15 (2008)
3. Lindgaard, G., Chattratichart, J.: Usability Testing: What Have We Overlooked? In: Proc. CHI 2007, pp. 1415-1424. ACM Press, New York (2007)
4. Cordes, E.R.: Task-selection bias: a case for user-defined tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13, 411-420 (2002)
5. Hassenzahl, M., Kekez, R., Burmester, M.: The importance of a software's pragmatic quality depends on usage modes. In: Luczak, H., Cakir, A.E., Cakir, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Work With Display Units (WWDU), pp. 275-276. ERGONOMIC, Berlin (2002)
6. Hassenzahl, M., Ullrich, D.: To do or not to do: Differences in user experience and retrospective judgments depending on the presence or absence of instrumental goals. Interacting with Computers 19, 429-437 (2007) (Pubitemid 47007746)
7. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. [A questionnaire for measuring per-ceived hedonic and pragmatic quality]. In: Ziegler, J., Szwillus, G. (eds.) Mensch & Computer 2003. Interaktion in Bewegung, pp. 187-196. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart (2001)
8. Zijlstra, F.R.H.: Efficiency in work behavior. A design approach for modern tools. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology. Delft University Press, Delft 1993)
9. Eilers, K., Nachreiner, F., Hänecke, K.: Entwicklung und Überprüfung einer Skala zur Erfassung subjektiv erlebter Anstrengung [Development and evaluation of a scale to assess subjectively perceived effort]. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 40, 215-224 (1986)
10. Naumann, A.B., Wechsung, I., Möller, S.: Factors Influencing Modality Choice in Multimodal Applications. In: André, E., Dybkjær, L., Minker, W., Neumann, H., Pieraccini, R., Weber, M. (eds.) PIT 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5078, pp. 37-43. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
11. Wechsung, I., Hurtienne, J., Naumann, A.: Multimodale Interaktion: Intuitiv, robust, bevorzugt und altersgerecht? In: Wandke, H., Struwe, D., Kain, S. (eds.) Mensch und Computer 2009. 9. fachübergreifende Konferenz für interaktive und koooperative Medien - Grenzenlos frei 2009, pp. 213-222. Oldenbourg, Berlin (2009)