Assessing user experience of interactive products: A Chinese questionnaire

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 104-109

  Liu, Shuqing ^a   Jian, Jiang ^a   Zheng, Xianjun Sam ^a   Liu, Zaijia ^a   Liu, Guanmin ^a   Peng, Kaiping ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

assessment; Chinese; culture and cognition; interactive product; questionnaire; user experience (UX) design

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; CHINESE; INTERACTIVE PRODUCTS; QUESTIONNAIRE; USER EXPERIENCE DESIGN;

COMMUNICATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS; PRODUCT DESIGN;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84870951691     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2397696.2397711     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Chang, H. C. & H. H. Lai, et al. (2007). A measurement scale for evaluating the attractiveness of a passenger car form aimed at young consumers. International Journal Of Industrial Ergonomics 37(1), 21-30.
2. Hassenzahl, M. (2001). The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13(4), 481-499.
3. Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19(4), 319-349.
4. Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., & Lehner, K. (2000). Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing. New York: ACM.
5. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität [AttracDiff: A questionnaire to measure perceived hedonic and pragmatic quality]. In J. Ziegler & G. Szwillus (Eds.), Mensch&Computer 2003. Interaktion in Bewegung (pp. 187-196). Stuttgart, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
6. Hassenzahl, M. (2002). The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 479-497.
7. Hassenzahl, M., Kekez, R., & Burmester, M. (2002). The importance of a software's pragmatic quality depends on usage modes. In H. Luczak, A. E. Cakir, & G. Cakir(Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Work With Display Units(WWDU 2002; pp. 275-276). Berlin: ERGONOMIC Institut für Arbeits- undSozialforschung.
8. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., & Uchida, Y. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 136-174). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
10. Masuda, T., Gonzalez, R., Kwan, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Culture and aesthetic preference: Comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1260-1275.
11. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K. P., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.
12. Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 11163-11170.
13. Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467-473.
14. Lewis, J. R. (1991). Psychometric evaluation of an after scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: The ASQ. SIGCHI Bulletin, 23, 78-81.
15. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 238-46.