The Predictive Nature of Pseudoneglect for Visual Neglect: Evidence from Parietal Theta Burst Stimulation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Varnava, Alice ^a,b   Dervinis, Martynas ^b   Chambers, Christopher D ^b  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGULAR GYRUS; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PHENOMENOLOGY; PREDICTION; PSEUDONEGLECT; TASK PERFORMANCE; THETA RHYTHM; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; BRAIN CORTEX; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879148039     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bisiach E, Bulgarelli C, Sterzi R, Vallar G, (1983) Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space. Brain and Cognition 2: 32-38.
2. Driver J, Mattingley JB, (1998) Parietal neglect and visual awareness. Nature Neuroscience 1: 17-22.
3. Jewell G, McCourt ME, (2000) Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38: 93-110.
4. Varnava A, Halligan PW, (2008) Comparative measures of linear extent: implications for clinical assessment. Applied Neuropsychology 15: 107-112.
5. Bowers D, Heilman KM, (1980) Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 18: 491-498.
6. Marshall JC, Halligan PW, (1994) Independent properties of normal hemispheric-specialization predict some characteristics of visuospatial neglect. Cortex 30: 509-517.
7. McCourt ME, Jewell G, (1999) Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 37: 843-855.
8. Porac C, Searleman A, Karagiannakis K, (2006) Pseudoneglect: evidence for both perceptual and attentional factors. Brain and Cognition 61: 305-311.
9. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Weiss PH, Toni I, Zilles K, (2002) Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgements: evidence from modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI. Neuropsychologia 40: 119-130.
10. Marshall JC, Halligan PW, (1989) When right goes left: an investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 25: 503-515.
11. Seki K, Ishiai S, Koyama Y, Sato S, (1999) Unassociated responses to two related task demands: a negative factor for improvement of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 37: 75-82.
12. Mesulam MM, (1981) A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology 10: 309-325.
13. Manly T, Woldt K, Watson P, Warburton E, (2002) Is motor perseveration in unilateral neglect 'driven' by the presence of neglected left-sided stimuli? Neuropsychologia 40: 1794-1803.
14. Mozer MC, Halligan PW, Marshall JC, (1997) The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of unilateral neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9: 171-190.
15. McCourt ME, (2001) Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia 39: 1065-1076.
16. Bisiach E, Rusconi ML, Peretti VA, Vallar G, (1994) Challenging current accounts of unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 32: 1431-1434.
17. Halligan PW, (1995) Drawing attention to neglect: the contribution of line bisection. Psychologist 8: 257-264.
18. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Posner MI, (1990) Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage: an analysis of line bisection. Neuropsychologia 28: 327-333.
19. Toba MN, Cavanagh P, Bartolomeo P, (2011) Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines. Neuropsychologia 49: 238-246.
20. Binder J, Marshall R, Lazar R, Benjamin J, Mohr JP, (1992) Distinct syndromes of hemineglect. Archives of Neurology 49: 1187-1194.
21. Bjoertomt O, Cowey A, Walsh V, (2002) Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 125: 2012-2022.
22. Daini R, Angelelli P, Antonucci G, Cappa SF, Vallar G, (2002) Exploring the syndrome of spatial unilateral neglect through an illusion of length. Experimental Brain Research 144: 224-237.
23. Doricchi F, Angelelli P, (1999) Misrepresentation of horizontal space in left unilateral neglect: role of hemianopia. Neurology 52: 1845-1852.
24. Fierro B, Brighina F, Oliveri M, Piazza A, La Bua V, et al. (2000) Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects. Neuroreport 11: 1519-1521.
25. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Weiss PH, Zilles K, (2001) The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers. Neuroimage 14: S59-67.
26. Oliveri M, Vallar G, (2009) Parietal versus temporal lobe components in spatial cognition: setting the mid-point of a horizontal line. Journal of Neuropsychology 3: 201-211.
27. Rorden C, Berger MF, Karnath HO, (2006) Disturbed line bisection is associated with posterior brain lesions. Brain Research 1080: 17-25.
28. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell'Acqua F, Forkel SJ, Simmons A, Vergani F, et al. (2011) A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nature Neuroscience 14: 1245-1246.
29. Verdon V, Schwartz S, Lovblad KO, Hauert CA, Vuilleumier P, (2010) Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain 133: 880-894.
30. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Shah NJ, Weiss PH, Halligan PW, et al. (2000) Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology 54: 1324-1331.
31. Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, Rorden C, Pambakian A, et al. (2003) The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 126: 1986-1997.
32. Harvey M, Kramer-McCaffery T, Dow L, Murphy PJ, Gilchrist ID, (2002) Categorisation of 'perceptual' and 'premotor' neglect patients across different tasks: is there strong evidence for a dichotomy? Neuropsychologia 40: 1387-1395.
33. Ishiai S, Koyama Y, Seki K, Nakayama T, (1998) What is line bisection in unilateral spatial neglect? Analysis of perceptual and motor aspects in line bisection tasks. Brain and Cognition 36: 239-252.
34. Foxe JJ, McCourt ME, Javitt DC, (2003) Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. Neuroimage 19: 710-726.
35. Vossel S, Eschenbeck P, Weiss PH, Fink GR, (2010) The neural basis of perceptual bias and response bias in the Landmark task. Neuropsychologia 48: 3949-3954.
36. Beis JM, Keller C, Morin N, Bartolomeo P, Bernati T, et al. (2004) Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke: qualitative and quantitative study. Neurology 63: 1600-1605.
37. Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T, (1980) Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 30: 327-330.
38. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, (1992) Left visuospatial neglect: a meaningless entity. Cortex 28: 525-535.
39. Ferber S, Karnath HO, (2001) How to assess spatial neglect- line bisection or cancellation tasks? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 23: 599-607.
40. Braun JB, Kirk A, (1999) Line bisection performance of normal adults: two subgroups with opposite biases. Neurology 53: 527-532.
41. Cowie R, Hamill G, (1998) Variation among nonclinical subjects on a line-bisection task. Perceptual and Motor Skills 86: 834.
42. Manning L, Halligan PW, Marshall JC, (1990) Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 28: 647-655.
43. Halligan PW, Manning L, Marshall JC, (1990) Individual variation in line bisection: a study of 4 patients with right-hemisphere damage and normal controls. Neuropsychologia 28: 1043-1051.
44. Briggs GG, Nebes RD, (1975) Patterns of hand preference in a student population. Cortex 11: 230-238.
45. Wassermann EM, (1998) Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 108: 1-16.
46. Rorden C, Brett M, (2000) Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behavioural Neurology 12: 191-200.
47. Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A, (2009) SoTCG (2009) Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology 120: 2008-2039.
48. Stokes MG, Chambers CD, Gould IC, English T, McNaught E, et al. (2007) Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 118: 1617-1625.
49. Stokes MG, Chambers CD, Gould IC, Henderson TR, Janko NE, et al. (2005) Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neurophysiology 94: 4520-4527.
50. Varnava A, Stokes MG, Chambers CD, (2011) Reliability of the 'observation of movement' method for determining motor threshold using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 201: 327-332.
51. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC, (2005) Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 45: 201-206.
52. Verbruggen F, Aron AR, Stevens MA, Chambers CD, (2010) Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 13966-13971.
53. George MS, Wassermann EM, Kimbrell TA, Little JT, Williams WE, et al. (1997) Mood improvement following daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression: a placebo-controlled crossover trial. The American Journal of Psychiatry 154: 1752-1756.
54. Loo CK, Taylor JL, Gandevia SC, McDarmont BN, Mitchell PB, et al. (2000) Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in controlled treatment studies: are some "sham" forms active? Biological Psychiatry 47: 325-331.
55. Nyffeler T, Wurtz P, Luscher HR, Hess CW, Senn W, et al. (2006) Repetitive TMS over the human oculomotor cortex: comparison of 1-Hz and theta burst stimulation. Neuroscience Letters 409: 57-60.
56. Luh KE, (1995) Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: what you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology 9: 435-448.
57. Macdonald-Nethercott EM, Kinnear PR, Venneri A, (2000) Bisection of shapes and lines: analysis of the visual and motor aspects of pseudoneglect. Perceptual and Motor Skills 91: 217-226.
58. Leibovitch FS, Black SE, Caldwell CB, Ebert PL, Ehrlich LE, et al. (1998) Brain-behavior correlations in hemispatial neglect using CT and SPECT: the Sunnybrook Stroke Study. Neurology 50: 901-908.
59. Vallar G, (2001) Extrapersonal visual unilateral spatial neglect and its neuroanatomy. Neuroimage 14: S52-58.
60. Vallar G, Perani D, (1986) The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions: a clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia 24: 609-622.
61. Husain M, Kennard C, (1996) Visual neglect associated with frontal lobe infarction. Journal of Neurology 243: 652-657.
62. Kinsbourne M, (1977) Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Advances in Neurology 18: 41-49.
63. Eshel N, Ruff CC, Spitzer B, Blankenburg F, Driver J, (2010) Effects of parietal TMS on somatosensory judgments challenge interhemispheric rivalry accounts. Neuropsychologia 48: 3470-3481.
64. Dafotakis M, Grefkes C, Wang L, Fink GR, Nowak DA, (2008) The effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the hand area of M1 on movement kinematics of the ipsilateral hand. Journal of Neural Transmission 115: 1269-1274.
65. Kobayashi M, Hutchinson S, Theoret H, Schlaug G, Pascual-Leone A, (2004) Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology 62: 91-98.
66. Chambers CD, Stokes MG, Janko NE, Mattingley JB, (2006) Enhancement of visual selection during transient disruption of parietal cortex. Brain Research 1097: 149-155.
67. Hilgetag CC, Theoret H, Pascual-Leone A, (2001) Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 4: 953-957.
68. Bloom JS, Hynd GW, (2005) The role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric transfer of information: excitation or inhibition? Neuropsychology Review 15: 59-71.
69. Robertson IH, (1999) Cognitive rehabilitation: attention and neglect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 385-393.