Pseudoneglect in back space

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 79-84

  Cocchini, Gianna ^a   Watling, Rosamond ^a,b   Sala, Sergio Della ^c   Jansari, Ashok ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Back space; Neglect; Pseudoneglect; Representation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; MALE; NEGLECT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; SPACE PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33845216246     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bowers D., and Heilman K.M. Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 18 (1980) 491-498
2. Chokron S., Colliot P., Bartolomeo P., Rhein F., Eusop E., Vassel P., et al. Visual, proprioceptive and tactile performance in left neglect patients. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 1965-1976
3. Farnè A., and Làdavas E. Auditory peripersonal space in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002) 1030-1043
4. Heilman K.M., Jeong Y., and Finney G.R. Spatial cognition. Neurology 63 (2004) 1994-1996
5. Heilman K.M., Watson R.T., and Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman K.M., and Valenstein E. (Eds). Clinical neuropsychology (1993), Oxford University Press, New York 279-336
6. Hubbard T.L. Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2 (1995) 322-338
7. Hubbard T.L., and Motes M.A. Does representational momentum reflect a distortion of the length or the endpoint of a trajectory?. Cognition 82 (2002) B89-B99
8. Kerzel D. Attention maintains mental extrapolation of target position: irrelevant distractors eliminate forward displacement after implied motion. Cognition 88 (2003) 109-131
9. Jewell G., and McCourt M.E. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 93-110
10. Lessard N., Paré M., Lepore F., and Lassonde M. Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature 395 (1998) 278-280
11. Lewald J. Opposing effects of head position on sound localization in blind and sighted human subjects. European Journal of Neuroscience 15 (2002) 1219-1224
12. Matin L. Visual localization and eye movements. In: Boff K.R., Kaufman L., and Thomas J.P. (Eds). Handbook of perception and human performance Vol. 1 (1986), Wiley, New York 1-45
13. McCourt M.E., and Garlinghouse M. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Cortex 36 (2000) 715-731
14. McCourt M.E., Garlinghouse M., and Reuter-Lorenz P.A. Unilateral visual cueing an asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect. Cortex 41 (2005) 499-511
15. Richard C., Rousseaux M., Saj A., and Honoré J. Straight ahead in spatial neglect: evidence that space is shifted, not rotated. Neurology 63 (2004) 2136-2138
16. Ruff R.M., Hersh N.A., and Pribram K.H. Auditory spatial deficits in the personal and extrapersonal frames of reference due to cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia 19 (1981) 435-443
17. Vallar G., Guariglia C., Nico D., and Bisiach E. Spatial hemineglect in back space. Brain 118 (1995) 467-472
18. White H., Minor S.W., Merrell J., and Smith T. Representational-momentum effects in the cerebral hemispheres. Brain Cognition 22 (1993) 161-170
19. Zwiers M.P., van Opstal A.J., and Cruysberg J.R.M. Two-dimensional sound-localization behavior of early-blind humans. Experimental Brain Research 140 (2001) 206-222