Line bisection in normal adults: Direction of attentional bias for near and far space

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1372-1378

  Varnava, A ^a,b   McCarthy, M ^b,c   Beaumont, J G ^b,c  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR NEURO DISABILITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Pseudoneglect; Reaching distance; Spatial attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEGLECT; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; READING; STIMULUS;

EID: 0036130455     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00204-4     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Pieces of the true crossover effect in neglect
2. Attentional grasp in far extra-personal space after thalamic infarction
3. When far becomes near: re-mapping of space by tool use
4. Coding of far and near space in neglect patients
5. Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task
6. Why is there a left-side underestimation in rod bisection?
7. Head and body space to left and right, front and rear. II. Visuotactual and kinesthetic studies and left-side underestimation
8. Bisecting rods and lines: effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects
9. Line bisection by left-handed pre-schoolers: a phenomenon of symmetrical neglect
10. Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction
11. Crossover, completion and confabulation in unilateral spatial neglect
12. Scanning direction and line bisection: a study of normal subjects and unilateral neglect patients with opposite reading habits
13. Influence of reading habits on line bisection
14. A PET study of visuospatial attention
15. Visuospatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space
16. No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space
17. Visual and motor components in simple line bisection: an investigation in normal adults
18. Attentional shifts towards the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect
19. Individual variation in line bisection: a study of four patients with right hemisphere damage and normal controls
20. Hemispheric activation versus spatio-motor cueing in visual neglect: a case-study
21. How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect
22. Left neglect for near but not far space in man
23. The bisection of horizontal and radial lines: a case-study of normal controls and 10 patients with left visuospatial neglect
24. Right-sided cueing can ameliorate left neglect
25. Spatial bias in visually-guided reaching and bisection following right cerebral stroke
26. Attention to near and far space: the third dichotomy
27. Hemispheric asymmetries of near-far spatial attention
28. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect
29. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks
30. The development of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients
31. Tactile rod bisection: hemispheric activation and sex differences
32. Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect
33. When right goes left: an investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect
34. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect
35. The effects of gender, menstrual phase and practice on the perceived location of the mid-sagittal plane
36. Effect of optokinetic stimulation in patients with visual neglect
37. Functional specialisation in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications
38. Hemispheric control of spatial attention
39. The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect
40. Deficits in attention and movement following the removal of post-arcuate (area 6) and pre-arcuate (area 8) cortex in macaque monkeys
41. Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection
42. Apparent right neglect in patients with left visual neglect
43. The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect
44. Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect
45. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations
46. Compression and lateral shift of mental co-ordinate systems in a line bisection task