Hemispheric differences in auditory oddball responses during monaural versus binaural stimulation

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 326-333

  Gilmore, Casey S ^a   Clementz, Brett A ^b   Berg, Patrick ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; ERP; Laterality; N1; N2; P2; P250; P300

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; EAR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; WORKING MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 67651033275     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alexander J.E., Bauer L.O., Kuperman S., Morzorati S., O'Connor S.J., Rohrbaugh J., et al. Hemispheric differences for P300 amplitude from an auditory oddball task. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 21 2-3 (1996) 189-196
2. Berg P., and Scherg M. A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 90 3 (1994) 229-241
3. Bolsche F., MacCrimmon D.J., and Kropf S. The effect of laterality of stimulus presentation on auditory P300 topography in schizophrenia. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 21 2 (1996) 83-88
4. Brown C.R., Clarke A.R., and Barry R.J. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 65 2 (2007) 122-131
5. Bruder G.E., Kayser J., Tenke C.E., Leite P., Schneier F.R., Stewart J.W., et al. Cognitive ERPs in depressive and anxiety disorders during tonal and phonetic oddball tasks. Clin. Electroencephalogr. 33 3 (2002) 119-124
6. Clarke J.M., Halgren E., and Chauvel P. Intracranial ERPs in humans during a lateralized visual oddball task: II. Temporal, parietal, and frontal recordings. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 7 (1999) 1226-1244
7. Clementz B.A., Barber S.K., and Dzau J.R. Knowledge of stimulus repetition affects the magnitude and spatial distribution of low-frequency event-related brain potentials. Audiol. Neuro-otol. 7 5 (2002) 303-314
8. Clementz B.A., Dzau J.R., Blumenfeld L.D., Matthews S., and Kissler J. Ear of stimulation determines schizophrenia-normal brain activity differences in an auditory paired-stimuli paradigm. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 10 (2003) 2853-2858
9. Cohen H.L., Ji J., Chorlian D.B., Begleiter H., and Porjesz B. Alcohol-related ERP changes recorded from different modalities: a topographic analysis. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 26 3 (2002) 303-317
10. Corbetta M., and Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3 3 (2002) 201-215
11. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29 3 (1996) 162-173
12. Crowley K.E., and Colrain I.M. A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115 4 (2004) 732-744
13. DeFrance J.F., Hymel C., Degionanni J., Kutyna F., Calkins D.S., Estes S., et al. Evidence of temporal lobe activation by discriminative spatial orientation. Brain Topogr. 6 2 (1993) 137-142
14. Demanez J.P., and Demanez L. Anatomophysiology of the central auditory nervous system: basic concepts. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Belg. 57 4 (2003) 227-236
15. Di S., and Barth D.S. Binaural vs. monaural auditory evoked potentials in rat neocortex. Brain Res. 630 1-2 (1993) 303-314
16. Dien J., Spencer K.M., and Donchin E. Parsing the late positive complex: mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology 41 5 (2004) 665-678
17. Donchin E., and Coles M.G. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci. 11 (1988) 357-374
18. Downar J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., and Davis K.D. The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 14 6 (2001) 1256-1267
19. Downs C.R., Hymel M.R., and Cranford J.L. Effects of monaural versus binaural stimulation on P300 scalp topography in elderly listeners. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 12 1 (2001) 1-6
20. Duncan-Johnson C.C., and Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14 5 (1977) 456-467
21. Ferree T.C., Luu P., Russell G.S., and Tucker D.M. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 3 (2001) 536-544
22. Ford J.M. Schizophrenia: the broken P300 and beyond. Psychophysiology 36 6 (1999) 667-682
23. Ford J.M., Mathalon D.H., Kalba S., Marsh L., and Pfefferbaum A. N1 and P300 abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia, epilepsy, and epilepsy with schizophrenialike features. Biol. Psychiatry 49 10 (2001) 848-860
24. Forman S.D., Cohen J.D., Fitzgerald M., Eddy W.F., Mintun M.A., and Noll D.C. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn. Reson. Med. 33 5 (1995) 636-647
25. Frodl T., Meisenzahl E.M., Muller D., Greiner J., Juckel G., Leinsinger G., et al. Corpus callosum and P300 in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 49 1-2 (2001) 107-119
26. Garcia-Larrea L., Lukaszewicz A.C., and Mauguiere F. Revisiting the oddball paradigm. Non-target vs neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional effects. Neuropsychologia 30 8 (1992) 723-741
27. Giard M.H., Perrin F., Pernier J., and Bouchet P. Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 27 6 (1990) 627-640
28. Gilmore C.S., Clementz B.A., and Buckley P.F. Stimulus sequence affects schizophrenia-normal differences in event processing during an auditory oddball task. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 24 2 (2005) 215-227
29. Godey B., Schwartz D., de Graaf J.B., Chauvel P., and Liegeois-Chauvel C. Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 10 (2001) 1850-1859
30. Greischar L.L., Burghy C.A., van Reekum C.M., Jackson D.C., Pizzagalli D.A., Mueller C., et al. Effects of electrode density and electrolyte spreading in dense array electroencephalographic recording. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115 3 (2004) 710-720
31. Halgren E., Marinkovic K., and Chauvel P. Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106 2 (1998) 156-164
32. Hämäläinen M.S., and Ilmoniemi R.S. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: Estimates of current distributions. Report TKK-F-A559 (1984), Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
33. Huotilainen M., Winkler I., Alho K., Escera C., Virtanen J., Ilmoniemi R.J., et al. Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 108 4 (1998) 370-379
34. Ille N., Berg P., and Scherg M. Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 19 2 (2002) 113-124
35. Jerger J., and Lew H.L. Principles and clinical applications of auditory evoked potentials in the geriatric population. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. North Am. 15 1 (2004) 235-250 viii-ix
36. Junghofer M., Elbert T., Tucker D.M., and Rockstroh B. Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology 37 4 (2000) 523-532
37. Kiehl K.A., Laurens K.R., Duty T.L., Forster B.B., and Liddle P.F. Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology 38 1 (2001) 133-142
38. Kilner J.M., Kiebel S.J., and Friston K.J. Applications of random field theory to electrophysiology. Neurosci. Lett. 374 3 (2005) 174-178
39. Kok A., and Rooyakkers J.A. ERPs to laterally presented pictures and words in a semantic categorization task. Psychophysiology 23 6 (1986) 672-683
40. Krusemark E.A., Keith Campbell W., and Clementz B.A. Attributions, deception, and event related potentials: an investigation of the self-serving bias. Psychophysiology 45 4 (2008) 511-515
41. Kutas M., McCarthy G., and Donchin E. Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 197 4305 (1977) 792-795
42. Linden D.E. The p300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us?. Neuroscientist 11 6 (2005) 563-576
43. Morstyn R., Duffy F.H., and McCarley R.W. Altered P300 topography in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 40 7 (1983) 729-734
44. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function (1992), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
45. Näätänen R., and Gaillard A. The orienting reflex and the N2 deflection of the event-related potential. In: Gaillard A., and Ritter W. (Eds). Tutorials in ERP Research: Endogenous Components (1983), North Holland, Amsterdam
46. Näätänen R., and Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24 4 (1987) 375-425
47. Oades R.D., Zerbin D., and Dittmann-Balcar A. The topography of event-related potentials in passive and active conditions of a 3-tone auditory oddball test. Int. J. Neurosci. 81 3-4 (1995) 249-264
48. Paavilainen P., Alho K., Reinikainen K., Sams M., and Näätänen R. Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 78 6 (1991) 466-479
49. Pantev C., Lutkenhoner B., Hoke M., and Lehnertz K. Comparison between simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked magnetic fields and potentials elicited by ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural tone burst stimulation. Audiology 25 1 (1986) 54-61
50. Pardo J.V., Fox P.T., and Raichle M.E. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature 349 6304 (1991) 61-64
51. Patel S.H., and Azzam P.N. Characterization of N200 and P300: selected studies of the Event-Related Potential. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2 4 (2005) 147-154
52. Polich J., and Corey-Bloom J. Alzheimer's disease and P300: review and evaluation of task and modality. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2 5 (2005) 515-525
53. Potts G.F., Dien J., Hartry-Speiser A.L., McDougal L.M., and Tucker D.M. Dense sensor array topography of the event-related potential to task-relevant auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106 5 (1998) 444-456
54. Reinvang I., Nordby H., and Nielsen C.S. Information processing deficits in head injury assessed with ERPs reflecting early and late processing stages. Neuropsychologia 38 7 (2000) 995-1005
55. Reite M., Zimmerman J.T., and Zimmerman J.E. Magnetic auditory evoked fields: interhemispheric asymmetry. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 51 4 (1981) 388-392
56. Reser D.H., Fishman Y.I., Arezzo J.C., and Steinschneider M. Binaural interactions in primary auditory cortex of the awake macaque. Cereb. Cortex 10 6 (2000) 574-584
57. Soltani M., and Knight R.T. Neural origins of the P300. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 14 3-4 (2000) 199-224
58. Stevens M.C., Calhoun V.D., and Kiehl K.A. Hemispheric differences in hemodynamics elicited by auditory oddball stimuli. Neuroimage 26 3 (2005) 782-792
59. Teder W., Alho K., Reinikainen K., and Näätänen R. Interstimulus interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs: "N1 enhancement" versus processing negativity. Psychophysiology 30 1 (1993) 71-81
60. Tenke C.E., and Kayser J. A convenient method for detecting electrolyte bridges in multichannel electroencephalogram and event-related potential recordings. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 3 (2001) 545-550
61. Tervaniemi M., and Hugdahl K. Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 43 3 (2003) 231-246
62. Virtanen J., Ahveninen J., Ilmoniemi R.J., Näätänen R., and Pekkonen E. Replicability of MEG and EEG measures of the auditory N1/N1m-response. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 108 3 (1998) 291-298
63. Woldorff M.G., Gallen C.C., Hampson S.A., Hillyard S.A., Pantev C., Sobel D., et al. Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90 18 (1993) 8722-8726
64. Worsley K.J. Detecting activation in fMRI data. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 12 5 (2003) 401-418
65. Yoshiura T., Zhong J., Shibata D.K., Kwok W.E., Shrier D.A., and Numaguchi Y. Functional MRI study of auditory and visual oddball tasks. Neuroreport 10 8 (1999) 1683-1688