Effects of cueing and of the direction of scanning on the tactile line bisection of normal adults

Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 31-51

  Philip, Jean ^a   Hatwell, Yvette ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Attention; Haptic exploration; Pseudoneglect; Tactile perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010552566     PISSN: 02499185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bisiach, E., Bulgarelli, C., Sterzi, R., & Vallar, G. (1983). Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space. Brain and Cognition, 2, 32-38.
2. Bisiach, E., Capitani, E., Colombo, A., & Spinnler, H. (1976). Halving a horizontal segment: A study on hemisphere-damaged patients with cerebral focal lesions. Archives Suisses de Neurologie, Neurochirurgie et de Psychiatrie, 118, 190-206.
3. Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18, 491-498.
4. Bradshaw, J. L., Nathan, G., Nettleton, N. C., Wilson, L., & Pierson, J. (1987). Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection? Neuropsychologia, 25, 735-738.
5. Bradshaw, J. L., Nettleton, N. C., Nathan, G., & Wilson, L. (1983). Head and body space to left and right, front and rear. II- Visuo tactual and kinesthetic studies and left-side underestimation. Neuropsychologia, 21, 475-486.
6. Brodie, E. E., & Pettigrew, L. E. L. (1995). Spatial field advantages for tactile line bisection as a function of hemispheric specialization inferred from dichotic listening. Neuropsychologia, 33, 53-61.
7. Brodie, E. E., & Pettigrew, L. E. L. (1996). Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropychologia, 34, 467-470.
8. Bryden, M. P. (1977). Measuring handedness with questionaires. Neuropsychologia, 15, 617-624.
9. Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (1995). Reading habits and line bisection: A developmental approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 51-58.
10. Chokron, S., & Imbert, M. (1993a). Egocentric reference and asymmetric perception of space. Neuropsychologia, 31, 267-275.
11. Chokron, S., & Imbert, M. (1993b). Influence of reading habits on line bisection. CognitiveBrain Research, 1, 219-222.
12. Chokron, S., Perenin, M.T., Rode, G. & Imbert, M. (1993). Scanning direction and line bisection. Perception, Suppl. 22, 120.
13. Fujii, T., Fukatso, R., Kimura, I., Sao, S. L., & Kogure, K. (1991). Unilateral spatial neglect in visual and tacile modalities. Cortex, 27, 330-343.
14. Fischer, M. H. (1994). Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection. Brain and Cognition, 25, 24-33.
15. Hatta, T., & Yamamoyto, M. (1986). Hemispheric asymmetries in a tactile bisection task: effect of hemispace of presentation. Neuropsychologia, 24, 265-269.
16. Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Coslett, H. B., Whelan, H., & Watson, R. T. (1985). Directional hypokinesia: prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect. Neurology, 35, 855-859.
17. Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, M. D. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5, 166-170.
18. Hjatalson, H., Caneman, G., & Tegner, R. (1993). Visual and tactile rod bisection in unilateral neglect. Cortex, 29, 583-588.
19. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Levander, M., Tegner, R., & Caneman, G. (1993). Tactile line bisection in normal subjects. Perception and Motor Skills, 76, 831-836.
21. Luh, K. E. (1995). Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: what you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology, 9, 435-448.
22. McCourt, M. E., & Olafson, C. (1997). Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: Psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 35, 369-380.
23. Manning, L., Halligan, P., & Marshall, J. C. (1990). Individual variation in line bisection a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 28, 647-655.
24. Mattingley, J. B., Pierson, J. M., Bradshaw, J. L., Phillips, J. G., & Bradshaw, J. A. (1993). To see or not to see: the effects of visible and invisible cues on line bisection judgements in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 31, 1201-1215.
25. Milner, A. D., Brechmann, M., & Pagliarini, L. (1992). To halve and to halve not: an analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 30, 515-526.
26. Sampaio, E., & Chokron, S. (1992). Pseudoneglect and reversed pseudoneglect among left-handers and right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 30, 797-807.
27. Sampaio, E., & Philip, J. (1991). Sensory and motor aspects of pseudoneglect, hemifield, and hemispace in the tactile modality. Brain and Cognition, 16, 74-82.
28. Schenkenberg, T., Bradford, D. C., & Ajax, E. T. (1980). Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurological impairments. Neurology, 30, 509-517.
29. Verfaellie, M., & Heilman, K. M. (1990). Hemispheric asymmetries in attentional control: implications for hand preference in sensorimotor tasks. Brain and Cognition, 14, 70-80.
30. Werth, R., & Poppel, E. (1988). Compression and lateral shift of mental coordinate systems in line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 26, 741-745.