Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: Pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space

Cortex

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 715-731

  McCourt, M E ^a   Garlinghouse, M ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Elevation; Line bisection; Pseudoneglect; Spatial attention; Viewing distance; Visual hemifield

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

EID: 0034522454     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70548-3     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Neglect of radial and vertical space: Importance of the retinotopic reference frame
2. Pieces of the true crossover effect in neglect
3. A left-distractor effect in far space
4. Left unilateral neglect or right hyperattention?
5. Spatial organization of visual perception following injury to the brain
6. Personal versus extrapersonal neglect: A group study of their dissociation using a reliable clinical test
7. Distinct syndromes of hemineglect
8. Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space
9. Halving a horizontal segment: A study on hemisphere-damaged patients with cerebral focal lesions
10. Unilateral neglect: Personal and extrapersonal
11. Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task
12. Leftwards error in bisecting the gap between two points: Stimulus quality and hand effects
13. Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection
14. Bisecting rods and lines: Effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects
15. Visual disorientation with special reference to lesions of the right hemisphere
16. Line bisection performance of normal adults: Two subgroups with opposite biases
17. A Newtonian model of perceptual distortion in visuo-spatial neglect
18. Altitudinal neglect following traumatic brain injury: A case report
19. Preserved insight in an artist with extrapersonal spatial neglect
20. Cross-over, completion and confabulation in unilateral spatial neglect
21. Psychophysical constraints on behavior in unilateral spatial neglect
22. Quantitative analysis of cancellation tasks in neglect
23. Effects of stimulus asymmetry on line bisection
24. The occurrence of visual neglect in patients with unilateral cerebral disease
25. Line bisection in a man with complete forebrain commissurotomy
26. Evidence for a disturbance of the body schema in neglect
27. Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space
28. No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space
29. Variation among nonclinical subjects on a line-bisection task
30. Bisection and perception of horizontal lines in normal children
31. Visual and motor components in simple line bisection: An investigation in normal adults
32. Distance modulation of neural activity in the visual cortex
33. Vertical orienting control: Evidence for attentional bias and "neglect" in the intact brain
34. Visual field influence on radial line bisection
35. Proximal intentional neglect: A case study
36. Personal and extrapersonal space: A case of neglect dissociation
37. How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect
38. Line bisection in visuo-spatial neglect: Disproof of a conjecture
39. Is neglect (only) lateral? A quadrant analysis of line cancellation
40. Left neglect for near but not far space in man
41. The bisection of horizontal and radial lines: A case study of normal controls and ten patients with left visuospatial neglect
42. Lateral and radial neglect as a function of spatial position: A case study
43. Differential effects of line length on bisection judgements in hemispatial neglect
44. Effects of visible and invisible cueing procedures on perceptual judgments in young and elderly subjects
45. Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness
46. Attentional resolution
47. Pseudoneglect in a patient with partial callosal disconnection
48. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect
49. Neglect and related disorders
50. Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant
51. Natural boundaries for the spatial spread of directed visual attention
52. Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect
53. Dissociated neglect for objective and subjective sizes
54. A representational vertical bias
55. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks
56. Neglect in three dimensions
57. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention
58. The control of attention by interaction between the cerebral hemispheres
59. Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: Evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace
60. Three-dimensional neglect phenomena following right anterior choroidal artery infarction
61. Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: Horizontal and vertical dimensions
62. Tactile rod bisection: Hemispheric activation and sex differences
63. Left spatial neglect: Effects of lesion size and premorbid brain atrophy on severity and recovery following right cerebral infarction
64. Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get
65. Motor and perceptual factors in pseudoneglect
66. Diagonal neglect on cancellation
67. Two-dimensional cancellation neglect: A review and suggested method of analysis
68. When right goes left: An investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect
69. The psychophysics of visuo-spatial neglect: A new orientation
70. The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude
71. Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect: Influence of line geometry
72. The influence of viewing eye on pseudoneglect magnitude
73. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: Focusing attention on two hypotheses
74. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect
75. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: Psychometric and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect
76. Neglect of near peripersonal space
77. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect
78. To halve or halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects
79. Line bisection errors in visuospatial neglect: Misguided action or size distortion
80. Recovery from neglect
81. Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect
82. Spatial representation in the normal visual field: A study of hemifield line bisection
83. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory
84. Right personal neglect following a left hemisphere stroke: A case report
85. Vertical neglect: Behavioral and electrophysiological data
86. Visual neglect for far and near extrapersonal space in humans
87. Stronger occipital cortical activation to lower than upper visual field stimuli
88. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications
89. The neuropsychology of 3-D space
90. Altitudinal neglect
91. The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect
92. Neural circuits for spatial attention and unilateral neglect
93. Dificits in attention and movement following the removal of postarcuate (area 6) and prearcuate (area 8) cortex in macaque monkeys
94. Organization of space perception: Neural representation of three-dimensional space in the posterior parietal cortex
95. Neural mechanisms of space vision in the parietal association cortex of the monkey
96. Pseudoneglect and reversed pseudoneglect among left-handers and right-handers
97. Sensory and motor aspects of pseudoneglect, hemifield and hemispace in the tactile modality
98. Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection
99. Spatial bias: Attentional and intentional influence in normal subjects
100. Peripersonal and vertical neglect
101. The influence of center of mass effect on the distribution of spatial attention in the vertical and horizontal dimensions
102. The neglected page
103. The upper and lower visual field of man: Electrophysiological and functional differences
104. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions to Donder's method
105. The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect
106. A normal bias towards a pictorially defined top in line bisection
107. Cortical representation of visual three-dimensional space
108. Modulation of neural stereoscopic processing in primate area V1 by viewing distance
109. Neural processing of stereopsis as a function of viewing distance in primate cortical area V1
110. Domain-specific forms of neglect
111. Two cortical visual systems
112. Near and for visual space in unilateral neglect
113. Compression and lateral shift of mental coordinate systems in a line bisection task
114. On the estimation of the middle of lines
115. Functional evaluation of hemi-neglect by means of a semi-structured scale: Personal extrapersonal differentiation