Developmental changes in line bisection: A result of callosal maturation?

Neuropsychology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 155-160

  Hausmann, Markus ^a,b   Waldie, Karen E ^a   Corballis, Michael C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN MATURATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CALLOSUM; FEMALE; GENDER; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SCHOOL CHILD; SPATIAL ORIENTATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE VALUES; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037278965     PISSN: 08944105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.1.155     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aboitiz, F., Scheibel, A. B., Fischer, R. S., & Zaidel, E. (1992). Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Research, 598, 143-153.
2. Achiron, R., Lipitz, S., & Achiron, A. (2001). Sex-related differences in the development of the human fetal corpus callosum: In utero ultrasonographic study. Prenatal Diagnosis, 21, 116-120.
3. Bimonte, H. A., Fitch, R. H., & Denenberg, V. H. (2000). Adult ovary transfer counteracts the callosal enlargement resulting from prepubertal ovariectomy. Brain Research, 872, 254-257.
4. Bishop, K. M., & Wahlsten, D. (1997). Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: Myth or reality? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 21, 581-601.
5. Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18, 491-498.
6. Bradshaw, J. L., Nettleton, N. C., Wilson, L., & Bradshaw, C. S. (1987). Line bisection by left-handed preschoolers: A phenomenon of symmetrical neglect. Brain and Cognition, 6, 377-385.
7. Bradshaw, J. L., Spataro, J. A., Harris, M., Nettleton, N. C., & Bradsaw, J. (1988). Crossing the midline by four to eight year old children. Neuropsychologia, 26, 221-235.
8. Brodie, E. E., & Pettigrew, L. E. L. (1996). Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropsychologia, 34, 467-470.
9. Celotti, F., Melcangi, R. C., Negri-Cesi, P., Ballabio, M., & Martini, L. (1987). Differential distribution of 5α reductase in the central nervous system of the rat and the mouse: Are white matter structures of the brain target tissue for testosterone action? Journal of Steroid Biochemistry, 26, 125-129.
10. Clarke, J. M., & Zaidel, E. (1994). Anatomical-behavioral relationships: Corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization. Behavioral Brain Research, 64, 185-202.
11. Corballis, M. C. (1995). Line bisection in a man with complete forebrain commissurotomy. Neuropsychology, 9, 147-156.
12. DeLacoste, M. C., Kirkpatrick, J. B., & Ross, E. D. (1985). Topography of the human corpus callosum. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 44, 578-591.
13. DeLacoste-Utamsing, C., & Holloway, R. L. (1982, June 25). Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Science, 216, 1431-1432.
14. Dellatolas, G., Coutin, T., & De Agostini, M. (1996). Bisection and perception of horizontal lines in normal children. Cortex, 32, 705-715.
15. Dobler, V., Manly, T., Atkinson, J., Wilson, B. A., Ioannou, K., & Robertson, I. H. (2001). Interaction of hand use and spatial selective attention in children. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1055-1064.
16. Driesen, N. R., & Raz, N. (1995). The influence of sex, age, and handedness on the corpus callosum morphology: A meta analysis. Psychobiology, 23, 240-247.
17. Fleischauer, K., & Wartenberg, H. (1967). Elekronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen über das Wachstum der Nervenfasem und über das Auftreten der Markscheiden im Corpus Callosum der Katze [Electromicroscopic investigations of neuronal growth and myelination in the corpus callosum of cats]. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung, 83, 568-581.
18. Giedd, J. N., Rumsey, J. M., Castellanos, F. X., Rajapakse, J. C., Kaysen, D., Vaituzis, A. C., et al. (1996). A quantitative MRI study of the corpus callosum in children and adolescents. Developmental Brain Research, 91, 274-280.
19. Goodale, M. A., & Humphrey, G. K. (1998). The objects of action and perception. Cognition, 67, 181-207.
20. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20-25.
21. Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991, January 10). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
22. Hausmann, M., Ergun, G., Yazgan, Y., & Güntürkün, O. (2002). Sex differences in line bisection as a function of hand. Neuropsychologia, 40, 235-240.
23. Heilman, K., Bowers, D., & Watson, R. (1984). Pseudoneglect in a patient with partial callosal disconnection. Brain, 107, 519-532.
24. Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5, 166-170.
25. Heilman, K. M., & Van Den Abell, T. (1980). Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying asymmetries of attention (neglect). Neurology, 30, 327-330.
26. Holloway, R. L., Anderson, P. J., Defendini, R., & Harper, C. (1993). Sexual dimorphism of the human corpus callosum from three independent samples: Relative size of the corpus callosum. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 92, 481-498.
27. Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93-110.
28. Karnath, H.-O., Ferber, S., & Himmelbach, M. (2001, June 21). Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature, 411, 950-953.
29. Karnath, H.-O., Himmelbach, M., & Rorden, C. (2002). The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: Putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. Brain, 125, 350-360.
30. Kashiwagi, A., Kashiwagi, T., Nishikawa, T., Tanabe, H., & Okuda, J. (1990). Hemispatial neglect in a patient with callosal infarction. Brain, 113, 1005-1023.
31. Kinsbourne, M. (1970). The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica, 33, 193-201.
32. LaMantia, A. S., & Rakic, P. (1984). The number, size, myelination, and regional variation of axons in the corpus callosum and anterior commissure of the developing rhesus monkey. Society of Neuroscience Abstracts, 10, 1081.
33. Luh, K. E. (1995). Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology, 9, 435-448.
34. MacLeod, M. S., & Turnbull, O. H. (1999). Motor and perceptual factors in pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37, 707-713.
35. Melcangi, R. C., Celotti, F., Ballabio, M., Poletti, A., Castano, P., & Martini, L. (1988). Testosterone 5α reductase activity in the rat brain is highly concentrated in white matter structures and in purified myelin sheats of axon. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry, 31, 173-179.
36. Mesulam, M.-M. (1981). A cortical network for directing attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 309-325.
37. Moffat, S. D., Hampson, E., Wickett, J. C., Vernon, P. A., & Lee, D. H. (1997). Testosterone is correlated with regional morphology of the human corpus callosum. Brain Research, 767, 297-304.
38. Nicholls, M. E. R., Bradshaw, J. L., & Mattingley, J. B. (2001). Unilateral hemispheric activation does not affect free-viewing perceptual asymmetries. Brain and Cognition, 46, 219-223.
39. Oka, S., Miyamoto, O., Janjua, N. A., Honjo-Fujiwara, N., Ohkawa, M., Nagao, S., et al. (1999). Re-evaluation of sexual dimorphism in human corpus callosum. NeuroReport, 10, 937-940.
40. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
41. Pujol, J., Vendrell, P., Junque, C., Marti-Vilalta, J. L., & Capdevila, A. (1993). When does the human brain development end? Evidence of corpus callosum growth up to adulthood. Annals of Neurology, 34, 71-75.
42. Rapoport, S. I. (1990). Integrated phylogeny of the primate brain, with special reference to humans and their diseases. Brain Research Review, 15, 267-294.
43. Roeltgen, M. G., & Roeltgen, D. P. (1989). Development of attention in normal children: A possible corpus callosm effect. Developmental Neuropsychology, 5, 127-139.
44. Scarisbrick, D. J., Tweedy, J. R., & Kuslansky, G. (1987). Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 25, 695-699.
45. Shuren, J., Wertman, E., & Heilman, K. M. (1994). The neglected page. Cortex, 30, 171-175.
46. Steinmetz, H., Jäncke, L., Kleinschmidt, A., Schlaug, G., Volkmann, J., & Huang, Y. (1992). Sex but no hand difference in the isthmus of the corpus callosum. Neurology, 42, 749-752.
47. Stocker, S., Guttinger, H., & Herth, G. (1994). Exogenous testosterone differentially affects myelination and neurone soma size in the brain of canaries. NeuroReport, 5, 1449-1452.
48. Tomasch, J. (1954). Size, distribution, and number of fibers in the human corpus callosum. Anatomical Record, 119, 119-135.
49. Van Vugt, P., Fransen, I., Creten, W., & Paquier, P. (2000). Line bisection performance in 650 normal children. Neuropsychologia, 38, 886-895.
50. Waxman, S. G., & Swadlow, H. A. (1976). Ultrastructure of visual callosal axons in the rabbit. Experimental Neurology, 53, 115-128.