Numerical processing overcomes left neglect for the greyscales task

NeuroReport

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 835-838

  Loftus, Andrea M ^a   Nicholls, Michael E R ^b   Mattingley, Jason B ^c   Bradshaw, John L ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attention; Neglect; Pseudoneglect; Right parietal; Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NEGLECT; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 43249100915     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282ff0fa8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Phillips JG. Reappraising unilateral neglect. Austr J Psychol 1992; 44:163-169.
2. McIntosh RD. The eyes have it: oculomotor exploration and line bisection in neglect. Cortex 2006; 42:692-698.
3. Bartolomeo P, Bachoud-Lévi A, Azouvi P, Chokron S. Time to imagine space: a chronometric exploration of representational neglect. Neuropsychologia 2005; 43:1249-1257.
4. Bisiach E, Luzzatti C. Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 1978; 14:129-133.
5. Zorzi M, Priftis K, Umiltà C. Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature 2002; 417:138-139.
6. Zorzi M, Priftis K, Meneghello F, Marenzi R, Umiltà C. The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: evidence from neglect. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44:1061-1067.
7. Priftis K, Zorzi M, Meneghello F, Marenzi R, Umiltà C. Explicit versus implicit processing of representational space in neglect: dissociations in accessing the mental number line. J Cog Neuro 2006; 18:680-688.
8. Fias W, Brysbaert M, Geypens F, d'Ydewalle G. The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: evidence from the SNARC effect. Math Cog 1996; 2:95-110.
9. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW. The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 1983; 21:589-599.
10. Bartolomeo P, Chokron S. Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect. Neuro Biobeh Rev 2002; 26:217-234.
11. Nicholls MER, Loftus AM, Gevers W. Number magnitude affects spatial attention in the absence of left/right response coding. Psychon Bull Rev 2008; (in press).
12. Nicholls MER, Bradshaw JL, Mattingley JB. Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of shade, numerosity and size. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37:307-314.
13. McCourt ME, Jewell G. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37:843-855.
14. Mattingley JB, Berberovic N, Corben L, Slavin MJ, Nicholls MER, Bradshaw JL. The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following right hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia 2003; 42:387-394.
15. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Behavioural inattention test. Titchfield, Hampshire: Thames Valley Test Company; 1987.
16. McCourt ME, Garlinghouse M, Reuter-Lorenz PA. A common origin for the effects of unilateral cueing and line geometry in the modulation of pseudoneglect. Cortex 2005; 41:499-511.
17. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farné A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin MT. Prism adaptation to rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 1998; 395:166-169.
18. Nicholls MER, Roberts GR. Pseudoneglect: a scanning, pre-motor or attentional bias? Cortex 2002; 38:113-136.
19. Luauté J, Halligan P, Rode G, Rossetti Y, Boisson D. Visuo-spatial neglect: a systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness. Neuro Biobehav Rev 2006; 30:961-982.