Response to different environmental stress conditions of industrial and laboratory Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 734-741

  Garay Arroyo, A ^a   Covarrubias, A A ^a   Clark, I ^a   Nino I ^a   Gosset, G ^a   Martinez, A ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; BAGASSE; FURFURAL; PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE; SUGAR;

ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FUNGUS;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FUNGAL CELL CULTURE; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE ACTIVATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GROWTH RATE; HEAT SHOCK; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; STRESS; SUGARCANE;

ACETIC ACID; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BIOMASS; ETHANOL; FREEZING; FURALDEHYDE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GLUCOSE; GROWTH INHIBITORS; HEAT; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; OXIDATIVE STRESS; POLYSACCHARIDES; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ARUNDINARIA; AZTECA; FUNGI; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHARUM; SACCHARUM HYBRID CULTIVAR;

EID: 1542359000     PISSN: 01757598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-003-1414-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Amoros M, Estruch F (2001) Hsf1p and Msn2/4p cooperate in the expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HSP26 and HSP104 in a gene and stress type-dependent manner. Mol Microbiol 39:1523-1532
2. Beall DS, Ohta K, Ingram LO (1991) Parametric studies of ethanol production from xylose and other sugars by recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 38:296-303
3. Collart M, Oliviero S (1995) In: Ausubel FM et al (eds) Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley, New York, pp 13.12.1-13.12.4
4. Corkidi G, Diaz-Uribe R, Folch-Mallol JL, Nieto-Sotelo J (1998) COVASIM: an image analysis method that allows detection of confluent sizes for automated counting. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1400-1404
5. Dijken JP van et al (2000) An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb Technol 26:706-714
6. Garay-Arroyo A, Covarrubias AA (1999) Three genes whose expression is induced by stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15:879-892
7. Hohmann S (2002) Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeast. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:300-372
8. Kensall DR, Lyons TP (1999) Management of fermentations in the production of alcohol: moving toward 23% ethanol. In: Jacques KA, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds) The alcohol textbook: a reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries, 3rd edn. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK, pp 26-38
9. Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Tengborg Ch, Stenberg K, Zacchi G, Nilvebrant N-O (1999) The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb Technol 24:151-159
10. Lee J, Godon C, Lagniel G, Spector D, Garin J, Labarre J, Toledano MB (1999) Yap1 and Skn7 control two specialized oxidative stress response regulons in yeast. J Biol Chem 274:16040-16046
11. Martín C, Jönsson LJ (2003) Comparison of the resistance of industrial and laboratory strains of Saccharomyces and Zygosaccharomyces to lignocellulose-derived fermentation inhibitors. Enzyme Microb Technol 32:386-395
12. 2 treatments ("overliming") on the composition and toxicity of bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysate. Biotechnol Bioeng 69:526-536
13. Narendranath NV, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (2001) Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. J Ind Microbiol 26:171-177
14. Palmqvist E, Grade H, Meinander NQ, Hahn-Hägerdal B (1999) Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 63:46-55
15. Petitjean A, Hilger F, Tatchell K (1990) Comparison of thermosensitive alleles of the CDC25 gene involved in the cAMP metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 124:797-806
16. Pinal L, Cedeño M, Gutiérrez H, Alvarez-Jacobs J (1997) Fermentation parameters influencing higher alcohol production in the Tequila process. Biotechnol Lett 19:45-47
17. Rep M, Proft M, Remize F, Tamás M, Serrano R, Thevelein J M, Hohmann S (2001) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Skolp transcription factor mediates HOG pathway-dependent osmotic regulation of a set of genes encoding enzymes implicated in protection from oxidative damage. Mol Microbiol 40:1067-1083
18. Serrano R (1996) Salt tolerance in plants and microorganisms: toxicity, targets and defense responses Int Rev Cytol 165:1-52
19. Taherzadeh MJ, Eklund R, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C, Lidén G (1997a) Characterization and fermentation of dilute-acid hydrolyzates from wood. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:4659-4665
20. Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C, Lidén G (1997b) Acetic acid - friend or foe in anaerobic batch conversion of glucose to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Chem Eng Sci 52:2653-2659
21. Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C, Lidén G (2000) On-line control of fed-batch fermentation of dilute-acid hydrolyzates. Biotechnol Bioeng 69:330-338
22. Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Ingledew WM (2002) Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1616-1623